Mark Howard
@mark--howard.bsky.social
Researcher in Quantum Information
Asst Prof in Maths & Applied Maths at the University of Galway
markhoward.info
Asst Prof in Maths & Applied Maths at the University of Galway
markhoward.info
Preparing |T> is measuring (X+Y) by synthesizing Controlled_(X+Y) and then measuring the control bit. To take a step back, can you easily prepare the state |Controlled_(C_XYZ)> defined to be Controlled_(C_XYZ)|+>|Phi>, where |Phi> is a Bell State? If so you can Clifford convert that state to |CCZ>
September 9, 2025 at 1:21 PM
Preparing |T> is measuring (X+Y) by synthesizing Controlled_(X+Y) and then measuring the control bit. To take a step back, can you easily prepare the state |Controlled_(C_XYZ)> defined to be Controlled_(C_XYZ)|+>|Phi>, where |Phi> is a Bell State? If so you can Clifford convert that state to |CCZ>
It's a tale as old as time: The "Innovative beverage holdings"/inkjet company to Quantum company pipeline
March 5, 2025 at 8:04 PM
It's a tale as old as time: The "Innovative beverage holdings"/inkjet company to Quantum company pipeline
Off the top of your head, any idea if quantum communication complexity helps (e.g. reduced expected communication or increased success probability) for this specific problem?
February 22, 2025 at 12:13 PM
Off the top of your head, any idea if quantum communication complexity helps (e.g. reduced expected communication or increased success probability) for this specific problem?
Nice! I'm putting in n=4, k=2, d=2 and leaving everything else blank - no results. Also is H the stabilizer and T the destabilizer?
February 11, 2025 at 2:51 PM
Nice! I'm putting in n=4, k=2, d=2 and leaving everything else blank - no results. Also is H the stabilizer and T the destabilizer?