Marc Dissents
@marcdissents.bsky.social
Was hoping to wade into the deep end of climate fuckery in a quasi-functional democracy...
but hopium is a helluva drug.
Do not obey in advance.
FDT. FVP.
Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦
🌻born 323 ppm
🌐 SW Floriduh, Murika🔵🟧
MAGA? GFY 🖕🏼
(everyone else, you're cool)
but hopium is a helluva drug.
Do not obey in advance.
FDT. FVP.
Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦
🌻born 323 ppm
🌐 SW Floriduh, Murika🔵🟧
MAGA? GFY 🖕🏼
(everyone else, you're cool)
what's millions of sq. km of ice between friends though, amirite? 🤷♂️
November 26, 2025 at 3:42 AM
what's millions of sq. km of ice between friends though, amirite? 🤷♂️
"appeared drowsy"?
yeah, and Kristi Noem appears to have had "some work"
yeah, and Kristi Noem appears to have had "some work"
November 26, 2025 at 1:46 AM
"appeared drowsy"?
yeah, and Kristi Noem appears to have had "some work"
yeah, and Kristi Noem appears to have had "some work"
a fool and his money....
November 26, 2025 at 1:44 AM
a fool and his money....
prayin' we don't have to live under them for long
November 26, 2025 at 1:35 AM
prayin' we don't have to live under them for long
you bet yer ass! 'cuz– F*&% diversity, amirite?!
planet would be so much better if it was only, like, white people, dogs, and the animals we eat. that's it. and maybe horses, they're cool. but no bugs!!
planet would be so much better if it was only, like, white people, dogs, and the animals we eat. that's it. and maybe horses, they're cool. but no bugs!!
November 26, 2025 at 1:34 AM
you bet yer ass! 'cuz– F*&% diversity, amirite?!
planet would be so much better if it was only, like, white people, dogs, and the animals we eat. that's it. and maybe horses, they're cool. but no bugs!!
planet would be so much better if it was only, like, white people, dogs, and the animals we eat. that's it. and maybe horses, they're cool. but no bugs!!
<<asks AI to make a gif of a magic 8-ball showing a response of, "oh f*&%"
November 26, 2025 at 1:27 AM
<<asks AI to make a gif of a magic 8-ball showing a response of, "oh f*&%"
those rods are undercooked
November 25, 2025 at 2:31 AM
those rods are undercooked
fight back, or resign. if enough of them quit, it would have the same effect
November 24, 2025 at 9:41 PM
fight back, or resign. if enough of them quit, it would have the same effect
you gotta just love this for her
November 23, 2025 at 10:30 PM
you gotta just love this for her
+2.5° by mid-century is... oh, what's the technical term...
f*&%ing game over
f*&%ing game over
November 23, 2025 at 8:51 PM
+2.5° by mid-century is... oh, what's the technical term...
f*&%ing game over
f*&%ing game over
whore today, gone tomorrow
November 23, 2025 at 8:29 PM
whore today, gone tomorrow
why is he dressed like a peppermint candy?
November 23, 2025 at 3:41 PM
why is he dressed like a peppermint candy?
kicked the can all the way down the road to the end, past the 'DEAD END' sign, over the guardrail, down the hillside to the moraine where the glacier used to be 20 years ago...
November 23, 2025 at 3:34 PM
kicked the can all the way down the road to the end, past the 'DEAD END' sign, over the guardrail, down the hillside to the moraine where the glacier used to be 20 years ago...
I've read this, slowly, three times...
still no comprende
still no comprende
November 23, 2025 at 12:05 AM
I've read this, slowly, three times...
still no comprende
still no comprende
if he LITERALLY said, "I order you to start shooting protestors in the legs" ...
a) we have to *hope* the order will be refused, and
b) how could any officer complying with his order be punished, w/o first determining that the order was, in fact, illegal ??
a) we have to *hope* the order will be refused, and
b) how could any officer complying with his order be punished, w/o first determining that the order was, in fact, illegal ??
November 22, 2025 at 5:35 PM
if he LITERALLY said, "I order you to start shooting protestors in the legs" ...
a) we have to *hope* the order will be refused, and
b) how could any officer complying with his order be punished, w/o first determining that the order was, in fact, illegal ??
a) we have to *hope* the order will be refused, and
b) how could any officer complying with his order be punished, w/o first determining that the order was, in fact, illegal ??
I think this really cuts to the insanity of that SC opinion.
WHO would ultimately determine that he gave an "illegal" order?
why, SCROTUS, of course! you see the problem here
WHO would ultimately determine that he gave an "illegal" order?
why, SCROTUS, of course! you see the problem here
November 22, 2025 at 5:35 PM
I think this really cuts to the insanity of that SC opinion.
WHO would ultimately determine that he gave an "illegal" order?
why, SCROTUS, of course! you see the problem here
WHO would ultimately determine that he gave an "illegal" order?
why, SCROTUS, of course! you see the problem here