Ronen Mandelkern
mandelkern.bsky.social
Ronen Mandelkern
@mandelkern.bsky.social
Political economist
@TelAvivUni

Neoliberalism; Macroeconomic Policy; Welfare State; Privatization; Economists; Ideas & Institutions

https://sites.google.com/view/ronenmandelkern
https://sites.google.com/view/pen-workshop
16/
We got lots of excellent feedback along the way, and we are especially thankful to
@danielbeland.bsky.social

@yoniabramson.bsky.social
Julie Cooper, Hanna Lerner, Jonathan Rynhold & Yossi Shain, and to the editors and anonymous reviewers of
@poppublicsphere.bsky.social
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
15/
For diaspora politics, the study reveals a new kind of influence: Diaspora actors can be ideological entrepreneurs, not just donors - taking part in remaking their homeland’s ideas through shared identity and resources.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
14/
For Israel, this explains how American conservatism reshaped right-wing ideology - without replacing its ethno-nationalist foundation.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
13/
Key takeaway: Diaspora–Local Cooperation (DLC) allows ideational imports across multiple domains - but only when these ideas align with local actors’ needs and core beliefs do they generate a comprehensive ideological transformation.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
12/
But ideological change varied across domains:
✅ Deep in government & law (high fit with the Right’s interests).
⚙️ Moderate in economy.
👪 Limited in morality (less political utility, internal divisions).
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
11/
On social issues, American “family values” language—once absent in Israeli discourse—entered mainstream politics, shaping debates on feminism, LGBT rights, and Israel’s refusal to sign the Istanbul Convention.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
10/
Economically, neoliberal ideas were reconciled with and justified through Jewish tradition - casting self-reliance and limited government as biblical virtues.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
9/
This shift was most visible in the judicial overhaul: Ideas first articulated in Kohelet’s papers - curbing judicial review, limiting legal advisors’ authority - became core government policy.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
8/
The outcome? A genuine ideological shift within Israel’s Right. Yet this shift was not a rupture but a reconfiguration. The Israeli Right retained its core tenets - ethno-nationalism and territorial maximalism—while integrating new conservative ideas into its broader ideological framework.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
7/
This diaspora–local network translated, localized, and promoted American conservative ideas:
📘 Translated Scalia, Sowell, and Friedman.
⚖️ Advocated “judicial restraint.”
🏫 Promoted “school choice.”
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Imported “family values” discourse.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
6/
Empirically, we trace how Jewish-American conservatives and Israeli right-wing actors cooperated to build new institutions like Kohelet Policy Forum and the Tikvah Fund that became hubs of conservative thought in Israel.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
5/
In practice, diaspora actors supply resources + ideas,Local actors adapt (“localize”) them to domestic politics and discourse so it will resonate with the public → Together they build organizations that promote these ideas.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
4/
This kinship turns DLC into a unique channel of ideational importation. It allows the transfer of ideas across multiple domains - in our case, governmental, economic, and social moralities - which cumulate into an ideological shift, not just isolated policy transfer.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
3/
We propose a new mechanism to explain it: Diaspora–Local Cooperation (DLC): Collaboration between diaspora and homeland actors who share both values and a sense of belonging to the same nation.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
2/
Existing theories of ideational importation - via states, experts, or transnational networks - can’t explain this. The U.S. didn’t promote it; Israeli experts opposed it; and no global conservative think-tank network was at play.
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
1/
American-style conservatism - free markets, family values, judicial restraint - was historically foreign to Israel’s Right, which focused on ethnonationalism and territorial maximalism. Yet recently, the Israeli Right started embracing these ideas. Why?
October 20, 2025 at 7:38 PM
16/
We got lots of excellent feedback along the way, and we are especially thankful to
@danielbeland.bsky.social

@yoniabramson.bsky.social
as well as Julie Cooper, Hanna Lerner, Jonathan Rynhold & Yossi Shain, and to the editors and anonymous reviewers of
@poppublicsphere.bsky.social
October 20, 2025 at 7:27 PM
15/
For diaspora politics, the study reveals a new kind of influence: Diaspora actors can be ideological entrepreneurs, not just donors - taking part in remaking their homeland’s ideas through shared identity and resources.
October 20, 2025 at 7:27 PM
14/
For Israel, this explains how American conservatism reshaped right-wing ideology - without replacing its ethno-nationalist foundation.
October 20, 2025 at 7:27 PM
13/
Key takeaway: Diaspora-Local Cooperation (DLC) allows ideational imports across multiple domains - but only when these ideas align with local actors’ needs and core beliefs do they generate a comprehensive ideological transformation.
October 20, 2025 at 7:27 PM
12/
But ideological change varied across domains:
✅ Deep in government & law (high fit with the Right’s interests).
⚙️ Moderate in economy.
👪 Limited in morality (less political utility, internal divisions).
October 20, 2025 at 7:27 PM
11/
On social issues, American “family values” language - once absent in Israeli discourse - entered mainstream politics, shaping debates on feminism, LGBT rights, and Israel’s refusal to sign the Istanbul Convention.
October 20, 2025 at 7:27 PM