Of course. And for field-related journals/publishers, their style sheets often address the main issues I’ve encountered. For the Diss., I’ve found that I’m having to create my own mini style sheet for things not strictly covered by the guides / things for which they give multiple options

Congrats, John! Glad to hear it went well!

That was always my grandmother's go to: Duke's Mayo and a sprinkling of sugar. Had one a couple of days ago!

NB: Homoground is not specifically an academic/writing group, but it is a great coworking community that has performed that same function for me over the past year.

Also, can we drop the “longtime ally” line from all the articles covering Newsom. You don’t get to rest on your laurels as an ally: allyship is a continual practice and present actions outweigh any supposed history of allyship. He has made very clear that he is not an ally

And this is not to critique the authors. They did a lot of things well. It's just a place we need to improve to make final reports more useful.

If you don't index them, at least include some description/association in the locus list so the reader has any idea of where to find it. Trying to find context of coins, & hours in, I'm really frustrated bec. combing through the stratigraphy chapter for a semblance of locus descriptions is torture.

In other news, with the apple now gone, she is now barking at the wind because it is causing too much noise (to be fair to her, some of it sounds like someone is right outside the door & her Great Pyrenees side always has things to say about that) #pyredoodle #dogsofbluesky

Meanwhile, someone is awaiting the daily apple tax #pyredoodle #dogsofbluesky (before anyone says anything, no, she does not get any of the sugar-free yogurt pudding)

Oh, look, camps for neurospicy folks under the guise of “helping” them…can’t figure out why that rings a bell…