Mark Barnes
@makakilo.bsky.social
Just a guy sitting and thinking on a hill on Oahu.
why do you continue to publish Kremlin propaganda? Kremlin lied about having taken Kupiansk and other cities and towns. Oh and of course Russia planned to take Ukraine in 3 days. 4 yrs later and after loss of 1 million Russians they still control only abt 20% of Ukraine.
December 17, 2025 at 11:29 PM
why do you continue to publish Kremlin propaganda? Kremlin lied about having taken Kupiansk and other cities and towns. Oh and of course Russia planned to take Ukraine in 3 days. 4 yrs later and after loss of 1 million Russians they still control only abt 20% of Ukraine.
actually, although that was a reasonable orediction by JVL when made, it seemingly will make it based on outrage today.
December 15, 2025 at 6:39 PM
actually, although that was a reasonable orediction by JVL when made, it seemingly will make it based on outrage today.
This is horrible journalism.. even if it does turn out to be true.
December 15, 2025 at 7:11 AM
This is horrible journalism.. even if it does turn out to be true.
That’s the Trump effect.
December 13, 2025 at 11:52 PM
That’s the Trump effect.
You gotta be kidding. Everyone is surprised. Not with last night specifically but over last 24 months? Kudos to them though, I lived in Indiana for 45 years and this is unreal.
December 7, 2025 at 7:00 PM
You gotta be kidding. Everyone is surprised. Not with last night specifically but over last 24 months? Kudos to them though, I lived in Indiana for 45 years and this is unreal.
Laudable. But if that were really the case why include the call for public action in last paragraph?
November 28, 2025 at 6:32 AM
Laudable. But if that were really the case why include the call for public action in last paragraph?
What is Jeffries trying to say here? Genuinely confused. If he is trying to say don’t turn the National Guard into urban street cops and exposed to risks for which they are not trained , say that. If instead he thinks there was something that would have prevented this ambush, say that.
November 28, 2025 at 2:09 AM
What is Jeffries trying to say here? Genuinely confused. If he is trying to say don’t turn the National Guard into urban street cops and exposed to risks for which they are not trained , say that. If instead he thinks there was something that would have prevented this ambush, say that.
No suspense here. Question is: will public pressure be too much once he does this?
November 18, 2025 at 10:56 PM
No suspense here. Question is: will public pressure be too much once he does this?
Horrible headline. Not true. He supports GOP voting for the House bill. Gamesmanship.
November 18, 2025 at 12:38 AM
Horrible headline. Not true. He supports GOP voting for the House bill. Gamesmanship.
I think he is the chief law enforcement officer. All the norms we thought we written down (like separation of Justice from the White House, remember Clinton tarmac meeting?)were
sound governance principles. If you can tell Pam Bondi what to do, then you are chief, right?
sound governance principles. If you can tell Pam Bondi what to do, then you are chief, right?
November 15, 2025 at 9:35 PM
I think he is the chief law enforcement officer. All the norms we thought we written down (like separation of Justice from the White House, remember Clinton tarmac meeting?)were
sound governance principles. If you can tell Pam Bondi what to do, then you are chief, right?
sound governance principles. If you can tell Pam Bondi what to do, then you are chief, right?
Funny graphic!! But lame duck? just 72 hrs ago he (through sheer madness and cruelty no other President would even consider) won a shutdown that preserved billionaire tax breaks.
November 13, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Funny graphic!! But lame duck? just 72 hrs ago he (through sheer madness and cruelty no other President would even consider) won a shutdown that preserved billionaire tax breaks.
please.. stop underestimating voters? the same ones that voted or did not vote in 2024?
November 12, 2025 at 6:38 PM
please.. stop underestimating voters? the same ones that voted or did not vote in 2024?
Unpopular opinion: getting a vote on subsidies which will of course lose is not a nothing. It can be valuable against every R Senator next November. But prolonging this game of shutdown chicken could turn public opinion against both Dems and Rs whereas now Dems are not largely blamed
November 9, 2025 at 11:18 PM
Unpopular opinion: getting a vote on subsidies which will of course lose is not a nothing. It can be valuable against every R Senator next November. But prolonging this game of shutdown chicken could turn public opinion against both Dems and Rs whereas now Dems are not largely blamed
Unpopular opinion: getting a vote on subsidies which will of course lose is not a nothing. It can be valuable against every R Senator next November. But prolonging this game of shutdown chicken could turn public opinion against both Dems and Rs whereas now Dems are not largely blamed.
November 9, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Unpopular opinion: getting a vote on subsidies which will of course lose is not a nothing. It can be valuable against every R Senator next November. But prolonging this game of shutdown chicken could turn public opinion against both Dems and Rs whereas now Dems are not largely blamed.
playoffs?? PLAYOFFS ????
November 5, 2025 at 8:32 PM
playoffs?? PLAYOFFS ????
Puzzled? There is no plan, that’s an AI rendering. He really plans a palace.
November 1, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Puzzled? There is no plan, that’s an AI rendering. He really plans a palace.
CBS is now state news. That’s why.
October 31, 2025 at 11:10 PM
CBS is now state news. That’s why.
what a stupid graphic. if you show 2020 where people were reasonably concerned the end of the world as they knew it was near compared to 2024 or any other time, of course the emotional health of people improved.
October 24, 2025 at 4:53 PM
what a stupid graphic. if you show 2020 where people were reasonably concerned the end of the world as they knew it was near compared to 2024 or any other time, of course the emotional health of people improved.
I clicked on the link in the article and reviewed the SCOTUS opinion cited. That case arose in a different context and involved a question other than corporate powers and in my view does not support what the authors of the article lead the reader to suppose.
October 19, 2025 at 10:28 PM
I clicked on the link in the article and reviewed the SCOTUS opinion cited. That case arose in a different context and involved a question other than corporate powers and in my view does not support what the authors of the article lead the reader to suppose.
No. Corporate laws give corporate powers. My state can’t tell P&G how to run its board meetings even if they are held in Hawaii. They might be able to limit how soap is sold here but that’s operational and not corporate. (I practiced corporate law 32 years)
October 19, 2025 at 8:42 PM
No. Corporate laws give corporate powers. My state can’t tell P&G how to run its board meetings even if they are held in Hawaii. They might be able to limit how soap is sold here but that’s operational and not corporate. (I practiced corporate law 32 years)