Mono-blue "token copies of noncreature artifacts" with Jacob Hauken as commander: moxfield.com/decks/Whhbv3...

of lands based on a formula built for 1v1 will get you the wrong answer. The right answer would be designed on "What number makes sure I don't flood too often?"

More importantly, in multiplayer commander, the beginning of the game takes the opposite role compared to 1v1 formats, in that the stronger you are at the beginning of the game, the more likely it is you will lose in EDH, whereas the inverse is true for 1v1.

As a result, optimizing the number -->

Why did you multiply by 100?

Shouldn't it be multiplied by 99?

I have a large extended family, so I'll get the first 100-200 signatures!

Two questions

Is there a petition for me to sign?

Do you verify signatures?

Cluestones are even worse. But yeah Hedron Archive is better than Mind Stone, and that applies to all analogous comparisons

In non-cEDH Commander, there's almost no deck where it's optimal to include cards like Rampant Growth (2 MV cards that make 1 mana) over better cards (3-4 MV cards that make 2+ mana).

Is this specifically for limited?

Also, I just re-read the whole thing (it's a short article), and my big takeaway is that I either need to work on developing a more natural way of writing that sounds like natural speaking... or I've already done that.

Anyone have any tips on that?

Sheldon Menery was such a kind person to me in the entire process, and while I never met him in person, I always felt great respect for him even when I disagreed with a decision he made (not that it happened that often).

Yeah, I think you're right on the money for the right image missing 1 card.

One of the commanders of my Sultai Treasure deck is Ich-Tekik, which turns my treasures into more and more power on the board. www.moxfield.com/decks/UYkYRT...

This is the commander of my mono-black deck, and I really like getting artifacts out of my opponents' decks! www.moxfield.com/decks/WbpFre...

I.e. is it feasible for the tool to do that?

Also, in terms of the size difference, how much smaller is the partner compared to a single commander? If it's 75%, then I would make the commander(s) 75% smaller (to make room for the companion) and the companion 75% of the size of the commander(s).

Yeah, it feels really weird! But I think it's good to have a plan for them.

Do you think the example I gave would be something you could implement into the tool?

The best solution I can think of is to make the commander(s) smaller to add a partner behind them.