#MasksWork
https://virologydownunder.com/
What was the broader picture we might be missing Jack?
Links to follow...
What was the broader picture we might be missing Jack?
Links to follow...
It might also be a payoff for decades of sound, evidence-based decision-making and for those with a cervix who've been part of the NCSP + helped get kids safely vaccinated
It might also be a payoff for decades of sound, evidence-based decision-making and for those with a cervix who've been part of the NCSP + helped get kids safely vaccinated
These data help promote the benefits of an NCSP, vaccination, and new, more advanced methods for those in our communities who don't seek out or can't easily access this harm-reducing and lifesaving approach. It's also an example for..
These data help promote the benefits of an NCSP, vaccination, and new, more advanced methods for those in our communities who don't seek out or can't easily access this harm-reducing and lifesaving approach. It's also an example for..
➡️Takes 10-15 years for a persistent HPV infection to change cells in ways that may lead to cervical cancer.
➡️Australia started National HPV Vaccination Program in 2007
➡️Takes 10-15 years for a persistent HPV infection to change cells in ways that may lead to cervical cancer.
➡️Australia started National HPV Vaccination Program in 2007
➡️The National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP). The program was implemented in 1991. Women aged 18 to 69 were invited to have a "Pap smear" every 2 years. Invasive, painful & embarrassing procedure
➡️ The NCSP changed in 2018. 25-74 years: viral ("HPV") DNA test every 5 years
➡️The National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP). The program was implemented in 1991. Women aged 18 to 69 were invited to have a "Pap smear" every 2 years. Invasive, painful & embarrassing procedure
➡️ The NCSP changed in 2018. 25-74 years: viral ("HPV") DNA test every 5 years
As Claire noted, there *were* younger cases & despite being called "extremely rare" in some places, 1.1%-1.6% (10-15 cases/900/yr) of cases being <25 isn't that IMO
As Claire noted, there *were* younger cases & despite being called "extremely rare" in some places, 1.1%-1.6% (10-15 cases/900/yr) of cases being <25 isn't that IMO