Lynn Ze Fahrrad
@lynnzegreyt.bsky.social
Also, claiming that I "retreat to race/moral theatre" is amazing considering this is absolutely a race and moral issue.
November 22, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Also, claiming that I "retreat to race/moral theatre" is amazing considering this is absolutely a race and moral issue.
Like what does it matter that the natives didn`t form Nations in the modern sense? THERE WERE PEOPLE LIVING THERE. Why couldn`t white settlers integrate into these societies?
November 22, 2025 at 3:33 PM
Like what does it matter that the natives didn`t form Nations in the modern sense? THERE WERE PEOPLE LIVING THERE. Why couldn`t white settlers integrate into these societies?
It`s not that I can`t argue "system design", it`s just that IT`S FUCKING IRRELEVANT. You`re trying to throw words at us and pretend that these make past situations different without actually explaining why they actually make a difference.
November 22, 2025 at 3:33 PM
It`s not that I can`t argue "system design", it`s just that IT`S FUCKING IRRELEVANT. You`re trying to throw words at us and pretend that these make past situations different without actually explaining why they actually make a difference.
"the actual mechanics of civilisational stability" 🙄
Dipsh*t, these immigrants brought slavery into the country, genocided the Natives and almost extinguished the buffaloes.
Even today, we still see the aftermath of the mess they brought upon us. "Civilisational stability" my ass!
Dipsh*t, these immigrants brought slavery into the country, genocided the Natives and almost extinguished the buffaloes.
Even today, we still see the aftermath of the mess they brought upon us. "Civilisational stability" my ass!
November 22, 2025 at 1:46 PM
"the actual mechanics of civilisational stability" 🙄
Dipsh*t, these immigrants brought slavery into the country, genocided the Natives and almost extinguished the buffaloes.
Even today, we still see the aftermath of the mess they brought upon us. "Civilisational stability" my ass!
Dipsh*t, these immigrants brought slavery into the country, genocided the Natives and almost extinguished the buffaloes.
Even today, we still see the aftermath of the mess they brought upon us. "Civilisational stability" my ass!
A lot of words just to say "Yeah, but it was good when white people did it."
November 22, 2025 at 1:42 PM
A lot of words just to say "Yeah, but it was good when white people did it."
Ah, of course!
That explains everything.
No further questions here, Milady.
That explains everything.
No further questions here, Milady.
November 16, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Ah, of course!
That explains everything.
No further questions here, Milady.
That explains everything.
No further questions here, Milady.
Have a nice day!
November 15, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Have a nice day!
The EXPERT is here to tell us what we and others are supposed to believe! 🙄
At the same time you can`t even give us a definition that supports your views.
At the same time you can`t even give us a definition that supports your views.
November 10, 2025 at 10:19 PM
The EXPERT is here to tell us what we and others are supposed to believe! 🙄
At the same time you can`t even give us a definition that supports your views.
At the same time you can`t even give us a definition that supports your views.
a) what is true?
b) If exceptions exist then there`s literally no argument you can make against the claim that Trans women are such an exception. Oh, except for deflect to other criteria....which also have exceptions...and then deflect again and again and again...
b) If exceptions exist then there`s literally no argument you can make against the claim that Trans women are such an exception. Oh, except for deflect to other criteria....which also have exceptions...and then deflect again and again and again...
November 10, 2025 at 10:11 PM
a) what is true?
b) If exceptions exist then there`s literally no argument you can make against the claim that Trans women are such an exception. Oh, except for deflect to other criteria....which also have exceptions...and then deflect again and again and again...
b) If exceptions exist then there`s literally no argument you can make against the claim that Trans women are such an exception. Oh, except for deflect to other criteria....which also have exceptions...and then deflect again and again and again...
*assigned
And I don`t wanna hear accusations about me being in a brainwashed cult from a GC.
And I don`t wanna hear accusations about me being in a brainwashed cult from a GC.
November 10, 2025 at 10:08 PM
*assigned
And I don`t wanna hear accusations about me being in a brainwashed cult from a GC.
And I don`t wanna hear accusations about me being in a brainwashed cult from a GC.
So you define sex on
a) something that doesn`t exist (bodies are not "organized around gamete production")
or b) somthing that has exceptions so you can`t exclude Trans people with it.
a) something that doesn`t exist (bodies are not "organized around gamete production")
or b) somthing that has exceptions so you can`t exclude Trans people with it.
November 10, 2025 at 10:00 PM
So you define sex on
a) something that doesn`t exist (bodies are not "organized around gamete production")
or b) somthing that has exceptions so you can`t exclude Trans people with it.
a) something that doesn`t exist (bodies are not "organized around gamete production")
or b) somthing that has exceptions so you can`t exclude Trans people with it.
"and recorded at birth"
*assigned
*assigned
November 10, 2025 at 9:47 PM
"and recorded at birth"
*assigned
*assigned
"Actually sex is determined at conception"
No.
No.
November 10, 2025 at 9:44 PM
"Actually sex is determined at conception"
No.
No.
Saying it is one thing, proving it another.
And I`ve not seen a definition of sex so far that would make it impossible to change sex while holding onto your other views.
And I`ve not seen a definition of sex so far that would make it impossible to change sex while holding onto your other views.
November 10, 2025 at 9:40 PM
Saying it is one thing, proving it another.
And I`ve not seen a definition of sex so far that would make it impossible to change sex while holding onto your other views.
And I`ve not seen a definition of sex so far that would make it impossible to change sex while holding onto your other views.
Play dumb on what?
Lol, do you actually believe we would use a term in ourselves that would call us male?
Lol, do you actually believe we would use a term in ourselves that would call us male?
November 10, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Play dumb on what?
Lol, do you actually believe we would use a term in ourselves that would call us male?
Lol, do you actually believe we would use a term in ourselves that would call us male?
Because they`ve been assigned male at birth and changed that assignment.
November 10, 2025 at 9:36 PM
Because they`ve been assigned male at birth and changed that assignment.
"If blond women are women, what`s the blond part for?
Do I have to explain adjectives to you?
Do I have to explain adjectives to you?
November 10, 2025 at 9:33 PM
"If blond women are women, what`s the blond part for?
Do I have to explain adjectives to you?
Do I have to explain adjectives to you?
Yeah, cause NONE of these are necessary to prove my point: SRY+ does NOT define "male"
November 10, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Yeah, cause NONE of these are necessary to prove my point: SRY+ does NOT define "male"
What contradictions?
The only one making contradictory claims here is you.
And I never said Trans women have Swyer or CAIS.
Did you read a single word I said?
The only one making contradictory claims here is you.
And I never said Trans women have Swyer or CAIS.
Did you read a single word I said?
November 10, 2025 at 9:26 PM
What contradictions?
The only one making contradictory claims here is you.
And I never said Trans women have Swyer or CAIS.
Did you read a single word I said?
The only one making contradictory claims here is you.
And I never said Trans women have Swyer or CAIS.
Did you read a single word I said?
"You know enough to know you’re completely wrong, but your ideology chains you up."
More ad hominems, more blabla. Yet the truth still remains that you`re contradicting yourself.
More ad hominems, more blabla. Yet the truth still remains that you`re contradicting yourself.
November 10, 2025 at 9:24 PM
"You know enough to know you’re completely wrong, but your ideology chains you up."
More ad hominems, more blabla. Yet the truth still remains that you`re contradicting yourself.
More ad hominems, more blabla. Yet the truth still remains that you`re contradicting yourself.
"That’s about as scientific as your laughable claim that trans women aren’t male."
Claiming that a claim is false because it "sounds laughable" is what science deniers do.
Claiming that a claim is false because it "sounds laughable" is what science deniers do.
November 10, 2025 at 9:24 PM
"That’s about as scientific as your laughable claim that trans women aren’t male."
Claiming that a claim is false because it "sounds laughable" is what science deniers do.
Claiming that a claim is false because it "sounds laughable" is what science deniers do.
"I bring the science and you bring the denialism."
Science is when you arbitrarily decide that SRY+ makes one group male and another one not male. 🙄
"Why don’t you say that the moon landings are fake and the earth is flat?"
Because I`m not a crank like you.
Science is when you arbitrarily decide that SRY+ makes one group male and another one not male. 🙄
"Why don’t you say that the moon landings are fake and the earth is flat?"
Because I`m not a crank like you.
November 10, 2025 at 9:24 PM
"I bring the science and you bring the denialism."
Science is when you arbitrarily decide that SRY+ makes one group male and another one not male. 🙄
"Why don’t you say that the moon landings are fake and the earth is flat?"
Because I`m not a crank like you.
Science is when you arbitrarily decide that SRY+ makes one group male and another one not male. 🙄
"Why don’t you say that the moon landings are fake and the earth is flat?"
Because I`m not a crank like you.
"99.999% accurate" is still inaccurate.
November 10, 2025 at 9:19 PM
"99.999% accurate" is still inaccurate.
Except when they aren`t.
Because you fuckheads arbitrarily decide that SRY+ makes one group male and another one not male.
Because you fuckheads arbitrarily decide that SRY+ makes one group male and another one not male.
November 10, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Except when they aren`t.
Because you fuckheads arbitrarily decide that SRY+ makes one group male and another one not male.
Because you fuckheads arbitrarily decide that SRY+ makes one group male and another one not male.