Persephone Meadowfeather
@lurkermcgoo.bsky.social
Having a bio on Bluesky is a mistake. Just figure out my deal from my posts.
This is just the same kind of fascist nativism that every reactionary espouses. People who believe that accepting even one immigrant, one refugee, one naturalized citizen, is a violation of the (unexplainable) birthright of superior rights that even the most fully assimilated must remain inferior to
December 7, 2025 at 11:10 PM
This is just the same kind of fascist nativism that every reactionary espouses. People who believe that accepting even one immigrant, one refugee, one naturalized citizen, is a violation of the (unexplainable) birthright of superior rights that even the most fully assimilated must remain inferior to
No. There is not a single justifiable reason for a word or space or category separate from at least some transexual females (MtF)
December 7, 2025 at 10:57 PM
No. There is not a single justifiable reason for a word or space or category separate from at least some transexual females (MtF)
Sex is mutable in humans because of medicine. And any relevant aspect of sex that explains why we have single sex categories is definitely mutable.
December 7, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Sex is mutable in humans because of medicine. And any relevant aspect of sex that explains why we have single sex categories is definitely mutable.
Humans have the medical ability to change sex, so unless other mammals develop human medical capabilities, then other mammals don’t matter.
and in any case only humans have laws or society or language or categorize things by sex or have bathrooms or anything possibly relevant to this issue.
and in any case only humans have laws or society or language or categorize things by sex or have bathrooms or anything possibly relevant to this issue.
December 7, 2025 at 3:22 AM
Humans have the medical ability to change sex, so unless other mammals develop human medical capabilities, then other mammals don’t matter.
and in any case only humans have laws or society or language or categorize things by sex or have bathrooms or anything possibly relevant to this issue.
and in any case only humans have laws or society or language or categorize things by sex or have bathrooms or anything possibly relevant to this issue.
That “superiority” aspect wasn’t the part I was responding to, it was the part denying that intelligence* has that aspect to it. It does.
I also generally have a lot of issues with people erring too far on the side of nature OR nurture, because only bad social policy results from ignoring either
I also generally have a lot of issues with people erring too far on the side of nature OR nurture, because only bad social policy results from ignoring either
December 7, 2025 at 3:19 AM
That “superiority” aspect wasn’t the part I was responding to, it was the part denying that intelligence* has that aspect to it. It does.
I also generally have a lot of issues with people erring too far on the side of nature OR nurture, because only bad social policy results from ignoring either
I also generally have a lot of issues with people erring too far on the side of nature OR nurture, because only bad social policy results from ignoring either
Makes me think of Stacey King using “sneaky hops” for every Doug McDermott dunk (a guy who had a 36 inch vertical leap mind you)….
December 7, 2025 at 2:13 AM
Makes me think of Stacey King using “sneaky hops” for every Doug McDermott dunk (a guy who had a 36 inch vertical leap mind you)….
Yeah I saw the DC and while it’s not that different, between the special effects clean up and the changes in some shots and edits, it’s a really substantial increase in quality.
December 7, 2025 at 1:26 AM
Yeah I saw the DC and while it’s not that different, between the special effects clean up and the changes in some shots and edits, it’s a really substantial increase in quality.
Stephen Jay Gould’s corpse just spinning to the point it’s generating 1000 ft-lbs of torque.
December 7, 2025 at 1:08 AM
Stephen Jay Gould’s corpse just spinning to the point it’s generating 1000 ft-lbs of torque.
Uhhh, people aren’t tabula rosa. Arguing genetics play zero role in individual intellectual capability, or that every single human alive is capable of the same learning or knowledge as long as they are just provided support… is simply not true. You can oppose eugenics without denying basic reality.
December 7, 2025 at 1:03 AM
Uhhh, people aren’t tabula rosa. Arguing genetics play zero role in individual intellectual capability, or that every single human alive is capable of the same learning or knowledge as long as they are just provided support… is simply not true. You can oppose eugenics without denying basic reality.
The idea that a transitioned transsexual female (yeah female) who is indistinguishable from any other woman in real life, is somehow any less deserving of female sex class rights and protections, due to whatever new argument about sex TERFs come up with next (it changes every few years), is sick.
December 7, 2025 at 12:56 AM
The idea that a transitioned transsexual female (yeah female) who is indistinguishable from any other woman in real life, is somehow any less deserving of female sex class rights and protections, due to whatever new argument about sex TERFs come up with next (it changes every few years), is sick.
What is objective!? Certainty not this, when you are misrepresenting how genetics works, and ignoring how anyone and everyone has every gene needed to cause either class of sex phenotype, and especially not when using it to argue that invisible or dormant genes are why women are oppressed.
December 7, 2025 at 12:53 AM
What is objective!? Certainty not this, when you are misrepresenting how genetics works, and ignoring how anyone and everyone has every gene needed to cause either class of sex phenotype, and especially not when using it to argue that invisible or dormant genes are why women are oppressed.
And you didn’t articulate a single reason why someone like Nicole Maines or Caroline Cossey should be, in any real world sense or meaning, classified differently than any other woman despite being as obviously and unambiguously of the female sex class as any other woman, in any relevant way.
December 6, 2025 at 10:34 PM
And you didn’t articulate a single reason why someone like Nicole Maines or Caroline Cossey should be, in any real world sense or meaning, classified differently than any other woman despite being as obviously and unambiguously of the female sex class as any other woman, in any relevant way.
It’s even more ridiculous because nothing about whatever increasingly meaningless or tendentious piece of invisible or dormant genetic trivia you try to find to exclude a transexual woman has anything AT ALL to do with why people need single sex spaces or how sex categories work in real life.
December 6, 2025 at 10:31 PM
It’s even more ridiculous because nothing about whatever increasingly meaningless or tendentious piece of invisible or dormant genetic trivia you try to find to exclude a transexual woman has anything AT ALL to do with why people need single sex spaces or how sex categories work in real life.
Sorry is it about gametes or genes or anatomy? I can’t follow you all. But this line you all repeat about dna is wrong. Genes flow from DNA to RNA then to the proteins that are coded. That’s how it works. And the sex linked gene flow patterns come from how sex hormone levels impact gene regulation.
December 6, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Sorry is it about gametes or genes or anatomy? I can’t follow you all. But this line you all repeat about dna is wrong. Genes flow from DNA to RNA then to the proteins that are coded. That’s how it works. And the sex linked gene flow patterns come from how sex hormone levels impact gene regulation.
implications not invasions lol
December 6, 2025 at 1:49 PM
implications not invasions lol
He has at times written, apparently without any evaluation of the invasions, that not everyone has a sex. But that somehow the people with no sex are not a third category. It’s as if set theory doesn’t exist to him.
It also shows why his definition of sex is medically and socially useless .
It also shows why his definition of sex is medically and socially useless .
December 6, 2025 at 1:49 PM
He has at times written, apparently without any evaluation of the invasions, that not everyone has a sex. But that somehow the people with no sex are not a third category. It’s as if set theory doesn’t exist to him.
It also shows why his definition of sex is medically and socially useless .
It also shows why his definition of sex is medically and socially useless .
There is never, and I mean never, a reason to treat a fully transitioned and assimilated transexual woman (even if she tells of her background out of a misguided assumption that you are friends and supportive of she did) any different than any other infertile or sterile female woman. Period.
December 6, 2025 at 1:37 PM
There is never, and I mean never, a reason to treat a fully transitioned and assimilated transexual woman (even if she tells of her background out of a misguided assumption that you are friends and supportive of she did) any different than any other infertile or sterile female woman. Period.
It is identical to how people who claim they used to be in favor of accepting refugees or migrants and allowing them to become naturalized citizens, but then some of them demanded actual equality as full citizens rather than being permanent guests and supplicants, so now you vote reform.
December 6, 2025 at 1:35 PM
It is identical to how people who claim they used to be in favor of accepting refugees or migrants and allowing them to become naturalized citizens, but then some of them demanded actual equality as full citizens rather than being permanent guests and supplicants, so now you vote reform.
You claim to be a materialist feminist but you aren’t, because it isn’t about risks, it isn’t about phenotype, it’s not about hormones, it’s not about behavior, it’s not about sexual risks, it’s not about appearance or voice, it’s not about anything meaningful. It’s about raw birth sex supremacy.
December 6, 2025 at 1:34 PM
You claim to be a materialist feminist but you aren’t, because it isn’t about risks, it isn’t about phenotype, it’s not about hormones, it’s not about behavior, it’s not about sexual risks, it’s not about appearance or voice, it’s not about anything meaningful. It’s about raw birth sex supremacy.
You have never once explained how a fully transitioned MtF isn’t both a woman and a female in literally every way that you are which has even one iota of relevance to why single sex spaces and rights exist. There is literally zero difference between you and a stealth post op transexual woman.
December 6, 2025 at 1:32 PM
You have never once explained how a fully transitioned MtF isn’t both a woman and a female in literally every way that you are which has even one iota of relevance to why single sex spaces and rights exist. There is literally zero difference between you and a stealth post op transexual woman.
Sex is not gender. Sex is a hardwired evolutionary instinct for identity and body relation and sexuality, and your argument in this regard is identical to arguing that sexual orientation or sexual instincts aren’t real or innate because they wouldn’t be triggered unless we are exposed to that sex.
December 6, 2025 at 1:29 PM
Sex is not gender. Sex is a hardwired evolutionary instinct for identity and body relation and sexuality, and your argument in this regard is identical to arguing that sexual orientation or sexual instincts aren’t real or innate because they wouldn’t be triggered unless we are exposed to that sex.
It’s just… it’s unfathomable how completely you must dehumanize transexual girls, how skeptical you are of them compared to you yourself when you were developing into a young woman, how you would so easily deny 98-99 of them a happy and integrated life as a female just because maybe 1-2 might not.
December 6, 2025 at 1:26 PM
It’s just… it’s unfathomable how completely you must dehumanize transexual girls, how skeptical you are of them compared to you yourself when you were developing into a young woman, how you would so easily deny 98-99 of them a happy and integrated life as a female just because maybe 1-2 might not.
Why do you scrutinize them then? Why is their desire and expectation for a female body and future and the ability to spend the entire rest of their life as one? Why destroy that future, and the fact any later transition will be much more dangerous AND with much worse outcomes? Indefensible and evil.
December 6, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Why do you scrutinize them then? Why is their desire and expectation for a female body and future and the ability to spend the entire rest of their life as one? Why destroy that future, and the fact any later transition will be much more dangerous AND with much worse outcomes? Indefensible and evil.
That what you would not tolerate for yourself (being forced into permanent separation from your sex class AND the entire body and future it represents, and to be rendered permanent mutated and in many ways destroyed, solely to avoid taking $10/mo. of estrogen or needing 1 and only 1 surgery).
December 6, 2025 at 12:58 PM
That what you would not tolerate for yourself (being forced into permanent separation from your sex class AND the entire body and future it represents, and to be rendered permanent mutated and in many ways destroyed, solely to avoid taking $10/mo. of estrogen or needing 1 and only 1 surgery).
I genuinely find it so shocking that you just won’t engage even one time, not even once, with just plain empathy. You, as a woman, who has had the chance to develop as and then live as a woman, in every real way, in real life, to even place yourself (YOU) in their shoes and imagine the horror.
December 6, 2025 at 12:56 PM
I genuinely find it so shocking that you just won’t engage even one time, not even once, with just plain empathy. You, as a woman, who has had the chance to develop as and then live as a woman, in every real way, in real life, to even place yourself (YOU) in their shoes and imagine the horror.