@lumidingo.bsky.social
What do you mean, _the world_ has gotten richer?
December 8, 2025 at 1:01 PM
What do you mean, _the world_ has gotten richer?
Who's the person you know? What's their name?
December 8, 2025 at 9:48 AM
Who's the person you know? What's their name?
Wes Streeting licks his man-baby lips...
December 8, 2025 at 9:14 AM
Wes Streeting licks his man-baby lips...
How many white supremacists do you need in a police force if the rules, procedures and motivations of the force are in the preservation of a white supremacist status quo?
People don't need to be card-carrying zealots in order to maintain a state of affairs that implicitly centers whiteness.
People don't need to be card-carrying zealots in order to maintain a state of affairs that implicitly centers whiteness.
December 7, 2025 at 2:58 AM
How many white supremacists do you need in a police force if the rules, procedures and motivations of the force are in the preservation of a white supremacist status quo?
People don't need to be card-carrying zealots in order to maintain a state of affairs that implicitly centers whiteness.
People don't need to be card-carrying zealots in order to maintain a state of affairs that implicitly centers whiteness.
Why do you think white supremacists would find virtue in course-correcting?
December 7, 2025 at 2:16 AM
Why do you think white supremacists would find virtue in course-correcting?
Did your school ever make you read that book about the Uraguayan rugby team that crash-landed in the Andes? The film adaptation came out in the early 90s, so I think it became like a little cultural touchstone for a while there.
December 7, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Did your school ever make you read that book about the Uraguayan rugby team that crash-landed in the Andes? The film adaptation came out in the early 90s, so I think it became like a little cultural touchstone for a while there.
I don't know how many spray cans you've huffed today, but if you genuinely want to try and argue that the field of neurology is primarily concerned with the spine, then it's too many and you need to stop, for your own health and wellbeing.
Be less fuckin' stupid.
Be less fuckin' stupid.
December 6, 2025 at 10:21 AM
I don't know how many spray cans you've huffed today, but if you genuinely want to try and argue that the field of neurology is primarily concerned with the spine, then it's too many and you need to stop, for your own health and wellbeing.
Be less fuckin' stupid.
Be less fuckin' stupid.
Neurologists specialize in treatment of the brain and the nervous system, not the spine.
You really need to stop digging.
You really need to stop digging.
December 6, 2025 at 7:53 AM
Neurologists specialize in treatment of the brain and the nervous system, not the spine.
You really need to stop digging.
You really need to stop digging.
So you thought, in your brain, "hey, I know this guy's a chiropractor, but he says a lot of things that sound smart about nutrition", and didn't immediately feel the hairs on the back of your neck stand up?
December 6, 2025 at 6:40 AM
So you thought, in your brain, "hey, I know this guy's a chiropractor, but he says a lot of things that sound smart about nutrition", and didn't immediately feel the hairs on the back of your neck stand up?
This is embarrassing, mate. Don't be like this. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Spinal Manipulation: A Systematic Review of Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trials
For many years, spinal manipulation has been a popular form of treatment. Yet the debate about its clinical efficacy continues. The research question …
www.sciencedirect.com
December 6, 2025 at 6:38 AM
This is embarrassing, mate. Don't be like this. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
We have to share air with these idiots
December 4, 2025 at 3:30 PM
We have to share air with these idiots
We should always remember the words of Nye Bevan.
December 4, 2025 at 7:39 AM
We should always remember the words of Nye Bevan.
Fighting fascism IS too hard, you're right. Better to demonstrate your moral vacuousness in showing an exposed belly to them, I suppose.
December 3, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Fighting fascism IS too hard, you're right. Better to demonstrate your moral vacuousness in showing an exposed belly to them, I suppose.
Watch them not agitate to get the law changed.
December 3, 2025 at 11:56 AM
Watch them not agitate to get the law changed.
Probably, although they seem to have sandwiched a halfway decent socdem government between two reactionary ones.
December 3, 2025 at 11:55 AM
Probably, although they seem to have sandwiched a halfway decent socdem government between two reactionary ones.
You should hate them more.
J.K. Rowling would rather kill Girl Guides and the Women's Institute than let them exist absent her moral sickness. That's a worthy fight. But we got collaborators instead, and now we have to stomach the crocodile tears that come with the capitulation.
J.K. Rowling would rather kill Girl Guides and the Women's Institute than let them exist absent her moral sickness. That's a worthy fight. But we got collaborators instead, and now we have to stomach the crocodile tears that come with the capitulation.
December 3, 2025 at 11:53 AM
You should hate them more.
J.K. Rowling would rather kill Girl Guides and the Women's Institute than let them exist absent her moral sickness. That's a worthy fight. But we got collaborators instead, and now we have to stomach the crocodile tears that come with the capitulation.
J.K. Rowling would rather kill Girl Guides and the Women's Institute than let them exist absent her moral sickness. That's a worthy fight. But we got collaborators instead, and now we have to stomach the crocodile tears that come with the capitulation.
No, I think we're also incompetent. We did have nine straight years of the worst clowns leading the country, culminating in the 2019 election where the country voted in the happy-clapper cunt who shat himself in the Engadine Maccas car-park, off a fabricated death tax scare via Facebook post.
December 3, 2025 at 11:45 AM
No, I think we're also incompetent. We did have nine straight years of the worst clowns leading the country, culminating in the 2019 election where the country voted in the happy-clapper cunt who shat himself in the Engadine Maccas car-park, off a fabricated death tax scare via Facebook post.
Not in those words, no. But it is what you said.
December 3, 2025 at 10:21 AM
Not in those words, no. But it is what you said.
The term we use for those that choose that path, is "collaborators".
December 3, 2025 at 10:18 AM
The term we use for those that choose that path, is "collaborators".
I mean, that may as well be a rhetorical question.
The transphobes want us to die or disappear. They're willing to use the implements of the state and the law to do it.
You have just stated, where people can see, that there's no choice but to contribute to that project to kill or disappear us.
The transphobes want us to die or disappear. They're willing to use the implements of the state and the law to do it.
You have just stated, where people can see, that there's no choice but to contribute to that project to kill or disappear us.
December 3, 2025 at 10:16 AM
I mean, that may as well be a rhetorical question.
The transphobes want us to die or disappear. They're willing to use the implements of the state and the law to do it.
You have just stated, where people can see, that there's no choice but to contribute to that project to kill or disappear us.
The transphobes want us to die or disappear. They're willing to use the implements of the state and the law to do it.
You have just stated, where people can see, that there's no choice but to contribute to that project to kill or disappear us.
This is, again, an organisation that has existed for over a hundred years. You don't think their taking an overt stance against transphobia carries weight in the public eye? Do you genuinely believe it's better that they be seen to be capitulating on their own ethical stance?
December 3, 2025 at 9:58 AM
This is, again, an organisation that has existed for over a hundred years. You don't think their taking an overt stance against transphobia carries weight in the public eye? Do you genuinely believe it's better that they be seen to be capitulating on their own ethical stance?
So your position is that they're forced by law to embrace transphobia into their century-old organisation, and that they don't mean harm. They're just going to do harm but feel bad about it. They're going to accept that they're doing harm and pretend they have no choice whether to oppose it or not.
December 3, 2025 at 9:57 AM
So your position is that they're forced by law to embrace transphobia into their century-old organisation, and that they don't mean harm. They're just going to do harm but feel bad about it. They're going to accept that they're doing harm and pretend they have no choice whether to oppose it or not.
I expect you aren't so impotent that you can add 2 and 2 together and get 4.
A woman poses a legal threat to Girlguiding based on their trans inclusion, the reactionary media whirrs up to disseminate it, and then Girlguiding puts out a statement saying they're banning trans girls.
Do the math.
A woman poses a legal threat to Girlguiding based on their trans inclusion, the reactionary media whirrs up to disseminate it, and then Girlguiding puts out a statement saying they're banning trans girls.
Do the math.
December 3, 2025 at 9:51 AM
I expect you aren't so impotent that you can add 2 and 2 together and get 4.
A woman poses a legal threat to Girlguiding based on their trans inclusion, the reactionary media whirrs up to disseminate it, and then Girlguiding puts out a statement saying they're banning trans girls.
Do the math.
A woman poses a legal threat to Girlguiding based on their trans inclusion, the reactionary media whirrs up to disseminate it, and then Girlguiding puts out a statement saying they're banning trans girls.
Do the math.