Incorrect judges are employed by the democratically controlled state

People are welcome to disagree with the judge though right? The judge works for us, not the other way round?

A step further: if you're on a microblogging platform and you encounter either the phrase 'MMT' or the phrase 'bond markets': your working assumption should be that you are interacting with people making arguments that have nothing to do with economics whatsoever, and can't define the terms anyway.

Any reasonable rhetorical analysis would suggest that the vast majority of the time, 'MMT' is not used to describe a monetary theory, but instead to create a category of 'heretic' into which ever more people and ideas can be bundled.