@liberaleftie.bsky.social
It’s not faux concern.
It’s misogynistic to dismiss women’s concerns about their safety.
It’s misogynistic to dismiss women’s concerns about their safety.
December 3, 2025 at 10:06 PM
It’s not faux concern.
It’s misogynistic to dismiss women’s concerns about their safety.
It’s misogynistic to dismiss women’s concerns about their safety.
I don’t think you can justifiably exclude transmen from the WI.
That rule will probably only be used for sexual assault and abuse services for women.
That rule will probably only be used for sexual assault and abuse services for women.
December 3, 2025 at 10:05 PM
I don’t think you can justifiably exclude transmen from the WI.
That rule will probably only be used for sexual assault and abuse services for women.
That rule will probably only be used for sexual assault and abuse services for women.
What a weird presumption to make.
December 3, 2025 at 6:30 PM
What a weird presumption to make.
Reposted
Translation:
Boys who identify as girls banned from joining Girlguiding.
Because Girlguiding is for girls not boys.
Fixed it.
Boys who identify as girls banned from joining Girlguiding.
Because Girlguiding is for girls not boys.
Fixed it.
December 2, 2025 at 10:44 PM
Translation:
Boys who identify as girls banned from joining Girlguiding.
Because Girlguiding is for girls not boys.
Fixed it.
Boys who identify as girls banned from joining Girlguiding.
Because Girlguiding is for girls not boys.
Fixed it.
Fair enough. I find the ruling pretty straight forward.
December 3, 2025 at 4:14 PM
Fair enough. I find the ruling pretty straight forward.
They clarified the law and it is retrospective.
December 3, 2025 at 4:12 PM
They clarified the law and it is retrospective.
They are discriminating on the basis of sex and not gender reassignment. Trans people aren't being discriminated here, male people are.
I think it would be quite easy to argue that it is justifiable and proportionate.
I think it would be quite easy to argue that it is justifiable and proportionate.
December 3, 2025 at 4:08 PM
They are discriminating on the basis of sex and not gender reassignment. Trans people aren't being discriminated here, male people are.
I think it would be quite easy to argue that it is justifiable and proportionate.
I think it would be quite easy to argue that it is justifiable and proportionate.
Girl guides are 10-14 years old so yes sleeping arrangements should be sex segregated. Do you disagree?
I'm not sure what purity test you are talking about.
I'm not sure what purity test you are talking about.
December 3, 2025 at 1:42 PM
Girl guides are 10-14 years old so yes sleeping arrangements should be sex segregated. Do you disagree?
I'm not sure what purity test you are talking about.
I'm not sure what purity test you are talking about.
Transmen can still join.
December 3, 2025 at 12:41 PM
Transmen can still join.
They were operating unlawfully prior to this.
December 3, 2025 at 12:39 PM
They were operating unlawfully prior to this.
What misogyny would that be?
December 3, 2025 at 12:24 PM
What misogyny would that be?
Not all of them....
December 3, 2025 at 11:02 AM
Not all of them....
No because the ban is for boys not girls.
December 3, 2025 at 10:59 AM
No because the ban is for boys not girls.
I do not support banning any girls from girl guiding.
Is that clear enough for you? 🙄
Is that clear enough for you? 🙄
December 3, 2025 at 10:51 AM
I do not support banning any girls from girl guiding.
Is that clear enough for you? 🙄
Is that clear enough for you? 🙄
I never said that was a safeguarding issue.
No.
No.
strawman argument fallacy detected with the strawman argument
ALT: strawman argument fallacy detected with the strawman argument
media.tenor.com
December 3, 2025 at 10:46 AM
I never said that was a safeguarding issue.
No.
No.
You clearly are.
You have to straw man so you can hide the fact you think girls do not deserve safeguarding.
You have to straw man so you can hide the fact you think girls do not deserve safeguarding.
December 3, 2025 at 10:36 AM
You clearly are.
You have to straw man so you can hide the fact you think girls do not deserve safeguarding.
You have to straw man so you can hide the fact you think girls do not deserve safeguarding.
You are mischaracterising my argument. Why?
Can we not agree that we should safeguard girls when appropriate?
Can we not agree that we should safeguard girls when appropriate?
December 3, 2025 at 10:25 AM
You are mischaracterising my argument. Why?
Can we not agree that we should safeguard girls when appropriate?
Can we not agree that we should safeguard girls when appropriate?
I don't have an issue with girls and boys playing with each other.
The issue is about safeguarding girls.
The issue is about safeguarding girls.
December 3, 2025 at 10:10 AM
I don't have an issue with girls and boys playing with each other.
The issue is about safeguarding girls.
The issue is about safeguarding girls.