Come hang out with me in Newark!
Come hang out with me in Newark!
I guess the part I want to emphasize is that we were asking for participant judgments on whether they thought the protagonist did the right thing *in the story* (or, in more technical terms, whether it is fictionally true that ...).
I guess the part I want to emphasize is that we were asking for participant judgments on whether they thought the protagonist did the right thing *in the story* (or, in more technical terms, whether it is fictionally true that ...).
This is for a 300-level philosophy of race course. Again, last time I taught it was 2022. I'm not sure I want to do the metaphysics of race stuff again.
Roughly the sequence is:
- The Racial Contract
- various racisms, various contexts
- ???
All suggestions welcome!
This is for a 300-level philosophy of race course. Again, last time I taught it was 2022. I'm not sure I want to do the metaphysics of race stuff again.
Roughly the sequence is:
- The Racial Contract
- various racisms, various contexts
- ???
All suggestions welcome!
I teach this 100level course called "Language, Knowledge, and Power". The last iteration was 2002, and that's some time ago. I think there are a lot more new works in this vicinity. Can you point me to some—especially ones that you think would be fun for first exposure to philosophy?
I teach this 100level course called "Language, Knowledge, and Power". The last iteration was 2002, and that's some time ago. I think there are a lot more new works in this vicinity. Can you point me to some—especially ones that you think would be fun for first exposure to philosophy?
For example, on a -50 to 50 left-right scale, where people would place 'progressive', 'liberal', 'centrist', 'classical liberal', etc.?
For example, on a -50 to 50 left-right scale, where people would place 'progressive', 'liberal', 'centrist', 'classical liberal', etc.?
Anyway, fun resource to play with!
Anyway, fun resource to play with!
Somewhat surprising to me, with the words 'racist' and 'sexist', there doesn't seem to be a dramatic rise in discussion from 1980 to present. Contrary to what some folks might tell ya.
Somewhat surprising to me, with the words 'racist' and 'sexist', there doesn't seem to be a dramatic rise in discussion from 1980 to present. Contrary to what some folks might tell ya.
When we asked people what % of people can be reasonably called 'racist', the mean is ~30 on a 0-100 scale, with wide variation. Ordinary people don't seem to use 'racist' in a way that implies racists are vanishingly rare.
philpapers.org/rec/HANMCI
When we asked people what % of people can be reasonably called 'racist', the mean is ~30 on a 0-100 scale, with wide variation. Ordinary people don't seem to use 'racist' in a way that implies racists are vanishingly rare.
philpapers.org/rec/HANMCI