How about in this case?
Surprisingly, most people *predominantly see 180° motion*, while 360° motion is hardly, if ever, perceived – even though the rings move in the same way as above!
[3/6]

experiment can be accessed here: https://run.pavlovia.org/mauromanucci/mcmc_exp/
Thanks in advance!
(The final experiment will be on native English speakers only, but for the pilots we are including any people willing to participate!)

Bravo pour votre sang-froid et pour tout ce que vous faites.

Not only did we reimplement and replicate a 50-years-old study within a fully #opensource framework (github.com/LeoVarnet/fa...), but we also analyzed the data with modern computation tools to reveal the "mental representation" of a tone in noise at different SNRs

The paper is now online and #openaccess on @hal_fr : "50 Years of Reverse Correlation: Replicating Ahumada et al.’s Pioneering Study" hal.science/hal-05060148

We successfully replicated the main finding, but were unable to reproduce some secondary results, such as the general performance levels. This is likely due to the presence of an intensive training session in the original study, a methodological detail not mentioned in the paper.

My conclusion: replicating an experiment is an *excellent* learning experience for cognitive science students, as it compels them to question the authors' methodological choices and highlights the critical importance of detailing every methodological aspect when writing a research paper.

expérience pour tester la perception humaine ?
Si vous avez des suggestions ou si vous repérez des coquilles n'hésitez pas à me faire des retours !
#textbook