Because replacing 'the state can kill people arbitrarily' with 'people can kill each other arbitrarily' doesn't do much for people.

Some of the children of patriots fans haven’t ever seen a superbowl win and they’re like 8! Somebody please think of the open mouth kissed children!

Holy shit is this a bad take. Imagine having the level of arrogance you're displaying here. You have absolutely zero knowledge what stories are or aren't being killed at your organization. Ask your colleagues who were there in '03 about the laundering-Bush's-lies thing. Or read the archive for '36.

Well, I'd like to see ol Donny Trump wriggle his way out of THIS jam!

You mean making money off of people's misery and anxiety?

Hey Marc, if you lost every important case brought before you, you'd probably lose your job, no?

Why shouldn't it be the same for the senate majority leader?

In my opinion, yes. SCOU has repeatedly determined that the amendment was valid and that the courts are bound by the amendment. I think the legislature probably had a window after all those cases to provide gerrymandered-ish map, and their refusal to do that doomed them.

But I am just an observer.

We're adding +1 D to the nationwide house race.

I am in a similar position as you; stable job but interested in starting to monetize some of the hobbies I enjoy, so I really appreciate the breakdown.

If he didn't coordinate it (which I don't think is impossible), then he got end-runned which does concern me about his ability to whip the caucus on some of the harder issues.