I liked that sqlc is very easy to incrementally adopt and solves one problem really well.
I liked that sqlc is very easy to incrementally adopt and solves one problem really well.
Do you remember what made it tricky to work with? Is the main issue lacking control over the generated HTTP+JSON APIs?
Do you remember what made it tricky to work with? Is the main issue lacking control over the generated HTTP+JSON APIs?
Both seem to cut down on some level of boilerplate which I like
Both seem to cut down on some level of boilerplate which I like
Other languages often have well established frameworks which can speed up development (e.g. ruby -> rails, python -> django etc). It doesn't feel like go has anything that's quite the same.
Other languages often have well established frameworks which can speed up development (e.g. ruby -> rails, python -> django etc). It doesn't feel like go has anything that's quite the same.
This project might be of interest though? It's generates a RESTful API (including the openapi spec) based on proto definitions. Might be well suited if you happen to use protos already
github.com/grpc-ecosyst...
This project might be of interest though? It's generates a RESTful API (including the openapi spec) based on proto definitions. Might be well suited if you happen to use protos already
github.com/grpc-ecosyst...