Kathryn Renaud
banner
krenaud1.bsky.social
Kathryn Renaud
@krenaud1.bsky.social
Cybersecurity analyst with a curiosity for AI and philosophy.
Building safer systems by day, exploring human systems by night.
💻 Security | 🌱 AI Hobbyist | 🧠 UPE Tech Chair | 👾 Gamer | 💬 Chronic Overthinker
EXACTLY. It’s our bodies, will, and knowledge that got them this far in the first place. Rich people love to pretend they’d survive if all their luxury vanished. Reality says otherwise. Strip away the comfort and the system propping them up and they fold instantly.
November 19, 2025 at 5:13 PM
It’s not hypocrisy, it’s a creative limitation. The people in power lack the ethics and knowledge to make tech clean because we’ve enabled it. It’s on us to police them and push real research. Stop making excuses for quitters. No one in tech is a quitter so why are you?
November 19, 2025 at 3:24 PM
Funny how you call tech an ethical disaster while typing on a phone that keeps your whole life running. Tech isn’t the problem. The people running it are. Blaming the tools while relying on them every day is a wild level of selective outrage.
November 19, 2025 at 3:15 PM
‘The philosopher’ is wild when Rocko was literally mocking people who give up. You took a satire about resisting absurd systems and turned it into your excuse to quit. If you want to surrender to corporate nonsense, fine, but do not blame a wallaby and tech for it.
November 19, 2025 at 3:10 PM
Funny thing about invoking Robespierre: the French Revolution didn’t ‘wait for the market to tank.’ They seized power and the means of production. Cheering for a collapse instead of accountability isn’t revolutionary, it’s just vibing with corporate fallout.
November 19, 2025 at 2:49 PM
The joke here is they’d fire everyone who is actually contributing good to the world and leave the villains employed. So this isn’t exactly the win you think it is. 😂
November 19, 2025 at 2:12 PM
I wonder how much of this has to do with all the countries of the world starting to outright ban people who try talking about things they have no degree in 😂
November 19, 2025 at 1:54 PM
I get you’re not being a jerk. I just want to clarify my stance. The AI handled most of the operation and the humans mainly corrected errors and guided it with slight adjustments in input. So my point is that this was not a human-centered intrusion, which is why the shift matters.
November 16, 2025 at 4:50 PM
I did. The report shows the AI handled most recon, exploit attempts, credential attacks, and data analysis on its own. Humans only corrected mistakes. That shift is exactly the issue. AI doing the heavy lifting at machine speed changes the entire threat model.
November 16, 2025 at 3:30 PM