Gregory starts at 2.25.

Och Gregory Gordon, ny doktorand vid SU! (Utöver att han är professor vid Peking-universitetet). Om ni skriver om inslaget, se hans nya bok. www.upress.virginia.edu/title/10088/

Dylikt program kan vara av nytta, samtidigt finns det allmänintresse att det blir känt under vilka förutsättningar man kan dras in i detta, är det endast dömda och misstänkta brottslingar eller även laglydiga i första, andra och tredje led från brottslingarna? Utövar SAKINT aktiv tillsyn? sakint.se

Particular note of operative para 7 where the UN Security Council "Authorizes Member States working with the BoP and the BoP to establish a temporary International Stabilization Force (ISF) in Gaza"

Jag skriver i min nya bok om detta rättsfall i förhållande till tingsrättens dom.

I find this extremely fascinating and hope for a ruling by the Swedish Supreme Court.

The Appeals Court comes to this conclusion by stating that domestic Swedish law & its understanding of genocide can have wider scope than the one adopted by international courts. Swedish law has wider scope based on will of the legislator (i.e. the parliament) as evidenced in the preparatory works.

The Appeal Court's reasoning very interesting on page 7. The perpetrator has to have intent of destroying a protected group in physical sense, but the actual acts does not have to include acts that involve physical destruction. The acts can include destruction of religious & cultural expressions.

Here is the comment in English I wrote on the district court judgment (11 February 2025) opiniojuris.org/2025/02/19/j...