give me a billion dollars and i will very quickly no longer have a billion dollars

ah! well you see i am a disciple of the ancient sword techniques so your student discount....

im a complete sicko that rebound the og armored core controls to be as close to ac6 kbm as possible. the world is yr oyster

i keep thinking abt adding a mech to our project thats powered by an array of v8 engines and spits carbon dioxide out every second its on. we have a system to simulate atmospheric pollution incl. making ppl faint or suffocate if the co2 concentration is too high i think it would be really funny

ud have to construct it differently if it were real; the seams on the puff are both not watertight and would prevent beer from filling the lower chambers if they were

are you seriously asking what the anarchist position on national borders is

i believe the standard anarchist position here draws from the storied work of a one charles j. guiteau

this design schema went "hey that one anarchist woman who led an armored battle train blowing people to smithereens across the steppes would be a cool setting" > "i aint gonna enable people playing tsarists tho" > "therefore it has to be abt anarchists and bolsheviks shooting each other"

its actually a nigh incomprehensible fractalized problem that will ultimately be solved by an equally sprawling constellation of works projects great and small. not sure what point you're making though.

also what is this motte and bailey bullshit with making your initial argument hinge on the tragedy of the commons and then turning around and admitting you knew it was bullshit all along? this is high key pathetic

abolishing the military is a pretty boilerplate position for anarchists, which you claim to be familiar with.

do mass building projects" is only a gotcha to laymen, which you claim not to be.

if you were well read on the history and practice of anarchy and anarchism you would know that workers self organized to complete public works projects under multiple periods of de jure and de facto statelessness, such as in anarchist-held areas of Spain and Greece. "how would anarchists organize to

lick my balls this isnt debate club

also raises questions about what point you think you were making. how is the us military, the current largest polluter on the planet, going to keep doing that under anarchism? show your work and cite your sources, you tedious meandering mediocrite

which is straightforwardly obvious to anyone who has a solid grasp of what anarchism is and seeks to do. likewise, while anarchism isn't a impeachably perfect solution to climate issues, the mere fact that the world's largest polluters would simply not exist under a hypothetical anarchist system

okay. aside from the 'tragedy of the commons' bit being facile on its face, as the other poster already explained, it wouldn't even be relevant if we gave it the benefit of the doubt. it was written about yeoman ranchers abusing grazelands; this is not a social class that would exist under anarchism

that was a question about your readings actually because I agree that you don't seem to have a firm grasp on the ideology and was curious what your background in it was

what'd you read?