Thank you for linking that! I suppose so many reasons - my current worry is that outreach and resources reach only those already interested in open research, and don't get dispersed widely enough! Also, I love your work at the Schol Comms Lab it's been so illuminating :D

There are many options available and nothing would be as powerful as academics voting with their feet. Including a whole raft of scholar-led, OA publishers! Submitting to/editing for the Big Five, while there's a whole range of reasons, contexts etc, remains a choice. 2/2

Oh that does look interesting (and possibly even understandable without a dictionary!)

I thought you were gonna pause the Mouffe diving for a bit and focus on data gathering! 😂

Thanks for letting me practice with a paint roller before I redecorate my place (I'm sure bitumen on iron and steel, and paint on wall, use the same technique)

Ok but in my defence I may have been a bit less hardline if Patrick hadn't initially said 'gang of cockatrice' instead of 'gang of cockatoos'

That URL isn't working for me, but this slightly different one is! katinamagazine.org/content/arti...

I was thinking more like a PSL-tini but yeah sure

Oddly what really offends me (yes I've been thinking about it) is it doesn't even have the balls to have a stupid pun name. It's basically just called SEO terms for the ingredients list.

That looks diabolical

Participating in this has been the greatest achievement of my life 💖

Sorry I'm shaking with excitement at this paradigm-shifting political debate

oh brilliant thank you, and apologies for my initial misunderstanding! :D

Hi! I'm trying to sign up for this but I get stuck in this screen (and if I select my account it redirects to this page) 😭

omg YOU WERE REVIEWER B THE WHOLE TIME

I'm glad the place has passed peer review

Great thank you!