Ken Sinclair
@khsinclair.bsky.social
Husband, father, empty nester, computer programmer, from MIT AI to robotics and speech and back to AI, now retired.
And don't have any preexisting conditions - prior COVID, age > 50, diabetes, cardiac, cancer risks, family history, depression, etc. Dems need to take opportunity to reeducate new generations how bad unregulated private insurance is.
November 25, 2025 at 9:32 PM
And don't have any preexisting conditions - prior COVID, age > 50, diabetes, cardiac, cancer risks, family history, depression, etc. Dems need to take opportunity to reeducate new generations how bad unregulated private insurance is.
No just trending negative
November 25, 2025 at 2:46 PM
No just trending negative
Too obviously going for an Ignoble Award
November 23, 2025 at 12:20 AM
Too obviously going for an Ignoble Award
Peace through Surrender won't last long
November 22, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Peace through Surrender won't last long
Yeah. Would be nice if an LLM could remove all the negatives for us, returning a trustworthy summary.
November 21, 2025 at 5:27 PM
Yeah. Would be nice if an LLM could remove all the negatives for us, returning a trustworthy summary.
New Orleans will have to go against their inner nature and refuse to feed them on thanksgiving.
November 21, 2025 at 12:16 AM
New Orleans will have to go against their inner nature and refuse to feed them on thanksgiving.
If there are tens of millions of criminal immigrants, why are 97% of the immigrants ICE arrests non-criminals?
November 20, 2025 at 5:37 PM
If there are tens of millions of criminal immigrants, why are 97% of the immigrants ICE arrests non-criminals?
I think the rationale is more motivated than that. As in: someone needs to be blamed, and someone needs to feel guilty, and those someones need to be women (mostly).
November 20, 2025 at 4:32 PM
I think the rationale is more motivated than that. As in: someone needs to be blamed, and someone needs to feel guilty, and those someones need to be women (mostly).
I suspect Saudis and American refiners will push gas prices way down over the next year for their political friend. Emphasize electricity costs instead.
November 20, 2025 at 1:59 PM
I suspect Saudis and American refiners will push gas prices way down over the next year for their political friend. Emphasize electricity costs instead.
Do Dems have a response team anticipating WH non-compliance tactics, workarounds for how to detect and prosecute non-compliance, and communicate with the public?
November 20, 2025 at 1:46 PM
Do Dems have a response team anticipating WH non-compliance tactics, workarounds for how to detect and prosecute non-compliance, and communicate with the public?
If there's a Dem involved (seems likely), I hope they have the courage to A) confess, and B) explain exactly how Epstein's system worked.
November 20, 2025 at 1:39 PM
If there's a Dem involved (seems likely), I hope they have the courage to A) confess, and B) explain exactly how Epstein's system worked.
12% of Epstein's emails referred to Trump. So a significant fraction of the DoJ material will refer to him as well. And redactions or omissions need to be documented, per the new law.
November 20, 2025 at 3:53 AM
12% of Epstein's emails referred to Trump. So a significant fraction of the DoJ material will refer to him as well. And redactions or omissions need to be documented, per the new law.
I guess I'm part of the problem, cause I didn't shop around for brain surgeons while I was unconscious in the ambulance. (all was well, thanks to Obamacare)
November 19, 2025 at 9:41 PM
I guess I'm part of the problem, cause I didn't shop around for brain surgeons while I was unconscious in the ambulance. (all was well, thanks to Obamacare)
Signing the legislation is better than a loose order, because it prescribes what can be redacted and requires documenting every redaction and omission.
November 19, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Signing the legislation is better than a loose order, because it prescribes what can be redacted and requires documenting every redaction and omission.
The legislation is quite specific about the redactions they may make, and how they are to be reported. We'll know at the 30-day mark whether they intend to follow the law or not, but their actions will be very clear. This isn't going away.
November 19, 2025 at 9:09 PM
The legislation is quite specific about the redactions they may make, and how they are to be reported. We'll know at the 30-day mark whether they intend to follow the law or not, but their actions will be very clear. This isn't going away.
Not a good look Jensen Huang
November 19, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Not a good look Jensen Huang
Uber but for criminal getaway vehicles, and you assume full liability
November 18, 2025 at 9:59 PM
Uber but for criminal getaway vehicles, and you assume full liability
Oh, they're withholding files re Epstein and Trump because there's an active investigation, into Trump? Tell us more, Ms. AG.
November 18, 2025 at 9:09 PM
Oh, they're withholding files re Epstein and Trump because there's an active investigation, into Trump? Tell us more, Ms. AG.
About 12% of Epstein's emails refer to Trump, so a significant fraction of the released material should too
November 18, 2025 at 8:43 PM
About 12% of Epstein's emails refer to Trump, so a significant fraction of the released material should too
About 12% of Epstein's emails refer to Trump, so a significant fraction of the released material should refer to him as well.
November 18, 2025 at 8:40 PM
About 12% of Epstein's emails refer to Trump, so a significant fraction of the released material should refer to him as well.
Yes, he has been accused with Epstein of wrongdoing and crimes. He hasn't been *convicted*, but can't since SCOTUS says he's above the law.
November 18, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Yes, he has been accused with Epstein of wrongdoing and crimes. He hasn't been *convicted*, but can't since SCOTUS says he's above the law.
But SCOTUS has said the President can't be investigated. If he can't be the subject of an active investigation, now or in the future, then documents about his role can't be withheld for that reason, right?
November 18, 2025 at 5:56 PM
But SCOTUS has said the President can't be investigated. If he can't be the subject of an active investigation, now or in the future, then documents about his role can't be withheld for that reason, right?
She said initially she would keep giving until the vault was empty, but that's provingmore difficult than expected, the vault keeps refilling.
November 17, 2025 at 10:14 PM
She said initially she would keep giving until the vault was empty, but that's provingmore difficult than expected, the vault keeps refilling.