Willing to bet that an hour of local PC gaming is probably less environmentally friendly than an hour of making images on ChatGPT

"inb4 every game uses AI duh" yeah I'm talking about "GenAI" of course.

But it works because it has superheroes and action sequences and the theme of family is not that hard to understand for a kid, but the actual plot is super contrived.

I think in general the concepts are very alien and you need to get why the idea of the government banning superheroes would be a thing, but even then the things that happen in the plot are way too complicated for a children's film lol

listen, if Valve put out a monitor and it was just a monitor without any advertisements in it they would sell 10 million copies by the week

I woke up wondering what the third thing actually was and totally forgot it was a new controller.

It was very similar to those displays marketed as displays for the Switch (Which shockingly is a real thing), but a little larger.

Only way I can imagine scaling parameters and training working out with their plans is if the new TPUs are significantly more performant/efficient. That seems like the bottleneck to actually let the public use it. That's why GPT-4.5 was a failure, too.

I think they're seeing a social contract getting rifted by technology and counting on it existing forever.

The ENTIRE open-source idea is based on an assumption of copyright. The opposite of copyright isn't "we all share." It's "don't mind if I do."