What do you mean by "new idea"?

"I think anyone who thinks AI is good for ideas...is not someone who needs to be/is creative."
I highly value having ideas and emphasize the need for creativity... but this stance seems like a subtle way to gatekeep a field. AI will advance and will be a tool people use in the generation of ideas

I wonder if this can be used to estimate structural complexity.
"What structural features take longer for humans to parse?"

I wish papers were more descriptive of the progression of science as it actually unfolded, rather than an after-the-fact compact description of hypoth.+expts. Often the hypothesis in the final paper is not exactly what was started with... May have epistemological value...

"Iatrogenic" may sometimes make more sense