Reposted by She's got Bette Davicise™
The appropriate chickpea to garlic ratio in hummus is a view.
'We need toilet cops to enforce European feminine beauty standards' is rank barbarity
'We need toilet cops to enforce European feminine beauty standards' is rank barbarity
November 28, 2025 at 1:11 PM
The appropriate chickpea to garlic ratio in hummus is a view.
'We need toilet cops to enforce European feminine beauty standards' is rank barbarity
'We need toilet cops to enforce European feminine beauty standards' is rank barbarity
Reposted by She's got Bette Davicise™
The amount of undeserved credibility cissexists get from having their putrid plans be collapsed into 'views' by cissexist media pisses me off
November 28, 2025 at 1:10 PM
The amount of undeserved credibility cissexists get from having their putrid plans be collapsed into 'views' by cissexist media pisses me off
Oi! Yew gorra loicense fer that dumper?
November 28, 2025 at 10:42 AM
Oi! Yew gorra loicense fer that dumper?
Reposted by She's got Bette Davicise™
bsky.app/profile/crac...
If I could make some movement towards this goal it would be greatly appreciated
If I could make some movement towards this goal it would be greatly appreciated
In October I got notice to move very last minute, made a mutual aid post and it didn't meet the goal. But the need didn't go away. The goal is 492/1000 reposts appreciated. Thanks to everyone boosting and helping so far 🙏🏿
www.paypal.me/DaneBard
cash.app/$dbard1
venmo.com/code?user_id...
www.paypal.me/DaneBard
cash.app/$dbard1
venmo.com/code?user_id...
November 21, 2025 at 3:52 PM
bsky.app/profile/crac...
If I could make some movement towards this goal it would be greatly appreciated
If I could make some movement towards this goal it would be greatly appreciated
Reposted by She's got Bette Davicise™
9/
It’s especially disturbing because the judge’s reasoning mirrors the tone of gender-critical commentary - not the statutory tests. Then we find out a gender-critical journalist was literally given airtime inside the courtroom.
Connect the dots. This stinks…
It’s especially disturbing because the judge’s reasoning mirrors the tone of gender-critical commentary - not the statutory tests. Then we find out a gender-critical journalist was literally given airtime inside the courtroom.
Connect the dots. This stinks…
November 27, 2025 at 2:42 PM
9/
It’s especially disturbing because the judge’s reasoning mirrors the tone of gender-critical commentary - not the statutory tests. Then we find out a gender-critical journalist was literally given airtime inside the courtroom.
Connect the dots. This stinks…
It’s especially disturbing because the judge’s reasoning mirrors the tone of gender-critical commentary - not the statutory tests. Then we find out a gender-critical journalist was literally given airtime inside the courtroom.
Connect the dots. This stinks…
Reposted by She's got Bette Davicise™
7/
And the timing matters. This happened in a trial where:
A young trans victim was involved,
Misgendering was excused,
Trauma responses were misunderstood,
and now a GC journalist keen to flog a new book is effectively endorsing a narrative against her.
Unacceptable.
And the timing matters. This happened in a trial where:
A young trans victim was involved,
Misgendering was excused,
Trauma responses were misunderstood,
and now a GC journalist keen to flog a new book is effectively endorsing a narrative against her.
Unacceptable.
November 27, 2025 at 2:42 PM
7/
And the timing matters. This happened in a trial where:
A young trans victim was involved,
Misgendering was excused,
Trauma responses were misunderstood,
and now a GC journalist keen to flog a new book is effectively endorsing a narrative against her.
Unacceptable.
And the timing matters. This happened in a trial where:
A young trans victim was involved,
Misgendering was excused,
Trauma responses were misunderstood,
and now a GC journalist keen to flog a new book is effectively endorsing a narrative against her.
Unacceptable.