Kaphka
@kaphka.bsky.social
I was just thinking that I hope Bluesky is ready for the inevitable wave of refugees.
December 4, 2025 at 10:46 PM
I was just thinking that I hope Bluesky is ready for the inevitable wave of refugees.
I was almost going to defend her, because I only read the highlight, but that sentence is worse. Somehow the rest of the paragraph is worse still.
December 4, 2025 at 10:11 PM
I was almost going to defend her, because I only read the highlight, but that sentence is worse. Somehow the rest of the paragraph is worse still.
Maybe he's just a pipe bomb enthusiast. (I'm only half joking.)
December 4, 2025 at 8:50 PM
Maybe he's just a pipe bomb enthusiast. (I'm only half joking.)
The combination of all those components certainly suggests pipe bombs. It's interesting that he was collecting them gradually for more than a year, though. It's hard to believe that he was planning an attack for all that time.
December 4, 2025 at 8:50 PM
The combination of all those components certainly suggests pipe bombs. It's interesting that he was collecting them gradually for more than a year, though. It's hard to believe that he was planning an attack for all that time.
Obviously:
Holiday Party (I Did a Little Cocaine Tonight) from "Co-op"
YouTube video by Calcium Chloride
www.youtube.com
December 4, 2025 at 7:17 PM
Obviously:
Reposted by Kaphka
there you have it
December 4, 2025 at 3:52 AM
there you have it
Maybe just make it subject to regulation. Congress can establish a non-partisan pardon board, and the President can only pardon people they recommend. They can give the President broader power for specific situations, like draft dodging.
December 3, 2025 at 5:57 PM
Maybe just make it subject to regulation. Congress can establish a non-partisan pardon board, and the President can only pardon people they recommend. They can give the President broader power for specific situations, like draft dodging.
Ironically, it was a lot more successful as an illustration of criminal procedure than as an xkcd knockoff. It doesn't look much like xkcd at all.
December 3, 2025 at 12:17 AM
Ironically, it was a lot more successful as an illustration of criminal procedure than as an xkcd knockoff. It doesn't look much like xkcd at all.
Yes, probably. It's clear that he didn't mean Vance, though.
December 2, 2025 at 7:59 PM
Yes, probably. It's clear that he didn't mean Vance, though.
This is dicta, so it's not binding, but it strongly suggests that the judge will dismiss the indictment again if it comes back.
December 2, 2025 at 7:49 PM
This is dicta, so it's not binding, but it strongly suggests that the judge will dismiss the indictment again if it comes back.
If you watch the video, he immediately clarifies that "my man" was Kamala Harris.
I appreciate the work that Aaron Rupar does, but you can't trust his summaries of the clips that he posts. They're often very misleading.
I appreciate the work that Aaron Rupar does, but you can't trust his summaries of the clips that he posts. They're often very misleading.
December 2, 2025 at 7:23 PM
If you watch the video, he immediately clarifies that "my man" was Kamala Harris.
I appreciate the work that Aaron Rupar does, but you can't trust his summaries of the clips that he posts. They're often very misleading.
I appreciate the work that Aaron Rupar does, but you can't trust his summaries of the clips that he posts. They're often very misleading.
The alt text is perfect.
December 2, 2025 at 3:47 AM
The alt text is perfect.
I think that's a coat bidet.
December 1, 2025 at 9:34 PM
I think that's a coat bidet.
I'm surprised by how many of these names are familiar. I would have guessed that the most-cited scholars would be people I've never heard of, writing about un-sexy technical topics.
November 30, 2025 at 10:13 PM
I'm surprised by how many of these names are familiar. I would have guessed that the most-cited scholars would be people I've never heard of, writing about un-sexy technical topics.
At least it's not actively misleading, like "defund the police". (And yes, that was promoted as a slogan by some activists, even if it was never mainstream.)
November 30, 2025 at 8:05 PM
At least it's not actively misleading, like "defund the police". (And yes, that was promoted as a slogan by some activists, even if it was never mainstream.)
Was "it takes a village" ever a proper slogan, or was it just something that someone said that Republicans then repeated for years? That's a sincere question. I don't remember where it came from.
November 30, 2025 at 8:02 PM
Was "it takes a village" ever a proper slogan, or was it just something that someone said that Republicans then repeated for years? That's a sincere question. I don't remember where it came from.
We had a President who could jog. People called him fat.
November 30, 2025 at 5:14 AM
We had a President who could jog. People called him fat.
He looked ridiculous running away from them.
November 30, 2025 at 2:53 AM
He looked ridiculous running away from them.
Hilarious on the ground. I used to have geese and a blue heron right outside my window every day. The heron was okay in the water, but as soon as he set foot on land the geese would start bullying him.
November 30, 2025 at 2:53 AM
Hilarious on the ground. I used to have geese and a blue heron right outside my window every day. The heron was okay in the water, but as soon as he set foot on land the geese would start bullying him.
Pigeons the size of turkeys, thanks to three hundred years of breeding.
November 27, 2025 at 12:11 AM
Pigeons the size of turkeys, thanks to three hundred years of breeding.
And Willis knew that, because endless RICO trials that amount to very little are her trademark. For example:
YSL Records racketeering trial - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
November 27, 2025 at 12:02 AM
And Willis knew that, because endless RICO trials that amount to very little are her trademark. For example:
It's not that he wasn't guilty. Adding the RICO charge guaranteed that there wouldn't be a trial for years. Without RICO (and without getting her entire office disqualified,) there likely would have been a trial before the election.
November 27, 2025 at 12:00 AM
It's not that he wasn't guilty. Adding the RICO charge guaranteed that there wouldn't be a trial for years. Without RICO (and without getting her entire office disqualified,) there likely would have been a trial before the election.