Kalendae
@kalendae-arum.bsky.social
“Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; …”
Amendment I
Amendment I
While exceedingly vile, there was no actionable defamation in his word vomit.
Additionally, in the US, the dead cannot be defamed.
Additionally, in the US, the dead cannot be defamed.
December 16, 2025 at 5:15 AM
While exceedingly vile, there was no actionable defamation in his word vomit.
Additionally, in the US, the dead cannot be defamed.
Additionally, in the US, the dead cannot be defamed.
So we need to punish people who have absolutely nothing to do with this and no authority to stop it if they wanted to?
December 16, 2025 at 3:03 AM
So we need to punish people who have absolutely nothing to do with this and no authority to stop it if they wanted to?
The Fairness Doctrine would change nothing about this.
December 16, 2025 at 3:00 AM
The Fairness Doctrine would change nothing about this.
Again: read the First Amendment. (Hint: it protects more than religion and speech.)
December 16, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Again: read the First Amendment. (Hint: it protects more than religion and speech.)
Again: please read the First Amendment.
December 16, 2025 at 1:11 AM
Again: please read the First Amendment.
They sure do like to block people - lol!
December 16, 2025 at 12:30 AM
They sure do like to block people - lol!
Yes - you want Congress to enact a licensing regime in direct conflict with the First Amendment.
December 16, 2025 at 12:29 AM
Yes - you want Congress to enact a licensing regime in direct conflict with the First Amendment.
You are not engaging in good faith - why should I?
December 15, 2025 at 10:36 PM
You are not engaging in good faith - why should I?
Why? It would change nothing about this.
December 15, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Why? It would change nothing about this.
Anti-intellectualism kicked off in the U.S. in the 60s when conservatives started attacking higher education.
December 15, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Anti-intellectualism kicked off in the U.S. in the 60s when conservatives started attacking higher education.
You do know his home and estate are located in CA, right?
December 15, 2025 at 9:58 PM
You do know his home and estate are located in CA, right?
Yes. Have you read the First Amendment recently?
December 15, 2025 at 9:55 PM
Yes. Have you read the First Amendment recently?
Which cannot be done without repealing the First Amendment.
December 15, 2025 at 9:55 PM
Which cannot be done without repealing the First Amendment.
What you want would require repeal of the First Amendment and would empower Trump and people like him to control the press.
December 15, 2025 at 7:44 PM
You constantly demonstrate that you have no understanding of §230 and have desire to change that.
December 15, 2025 at 6:38 PM
You constantly demonstrate that you have no understanding of §230 and have desire to change that.
What you want would require repeal of the First Amendment and would empower Trump and people like him to control the press.
December 15, 2025 at 6:16 PM
What you want would require repeal of the First Amendment and would empower Trump and people like him to control the press.
If you hate social media so much, why do you use it?
And I hope you don’t rely on product reviews.
And I hope you don’t rely on product reviews.
December 15, 2025 at 6:15 PM
If you hate social media so much, why do you use it?
And I hope you don’t rely on product reviews.
And I hope you don’t rely on product reviews.
So we should just destroy it in advance?
December 15, 2025 at 6:14 PM
So we should just destroy it in advance?
We already know you do not understand §230.
December 15, 2025 at 6:13 PM
We already know you do not understand §230.
Bullshit.
If you really believe that, you have led a very sheltered, privileged life.
If you really believe that, you have led a very sheltered, privileged life.
December 15, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Bullshit.
If you really believe that, you have led a very sheltered, privileged life.
If you really believe that, you have led a very sheltered, privileged life.
There are some issues that need to addressed, but they can (and should) be addressed with tweaks, not repeal.
For example, once a specific statement has been adjudicated to be unprotected speech (such as defamation), sites should have to be pro-active in removing it - not wait for complaints.
For example, once a specific statement has been adjudicated to be unprotected speech (such as defamation), sites should have to be pro-active in removing it - not wait for complaints.
December 15, 2025 at 4:16 PM
There are some issues that need to addressed, but they can (and should) be addressed with tweaks, not repeal.
For example, once a specific statement has been adjudicated to be unprotected speech (such as defamation), sites should have to be pro-active in removing it - not wait for complaints.
For example, once a specific statement has been adjudicated to be unprotected speech (such as defamation), sites should have to be pro-active in removing it - not wait for complaints.
They are more similar to a bookstore with an employee recommendation end cap on every aisle.
Sci fi? Try these…
Politics? Try these…
Conspiracy theories? Try these…
Sci fi? Try these…
Politics? Try these…
Conspiracy theories? Try these…
December 15, 2025 at 4:13 PM
They are more similar to a bookstore with an employee recommendation end cap on every aisle.
Sci fi? Try these…
Politics? Try these…
Conspiracy theories? Try these…
Sci fi? Try these…
Politics? Try these…
Conspiracy theories? Try these…
BlueSky. Mastodon. Blog posts. Local newspaper comment sections.
December 15, 2025 at 4:05 PM
BlueSky. Mastodon. Blog posts. Local newspaper comment sections.
Do you think BlueSky is a disinformation site?
December 15, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Do you think BlueSky is a disinformation site?