jeff pohlmeyer
@jvp.design
I've built a method for handling remote function returns but it feels very hacky especially considering I can't actually return an error from a remote function. Plus it feels more natural to redirect from the server rather than trigger a ‘goto‘ in the client
November 24, 2025 at 10:27 AM
I've built a method for handling remote function returns but it feels very hacky especially considering I can't actually return an error from a remote function. Plus it feels more natural to redirect from the server rather than trigger a ‘goto‘ in the client
jvp.sh/yQgsYh7R
The cookie thing may have only been command
If you use a form, though, while using enhance and you redirect from the form function itself, the form reset may never get called, which is bad UX if the user goes back there to see their previously filled in and submitted form
The cookie thing may have only been command
If you use a form, though, while using enhance and you redirect from the form function itself, the form reset may never get called, which is bad UX if the user goes back there to see their previously filled in and submitted form
There are definite deficiencies, though. For example, throwing an error reroutes to the nearest +error.svelte instead of simply returning. And not being able to set cookies in certain instances, which makes it difficult to use something like jvp.sh/1Qo7YFZM
They're great, but there are shortcomings
They're great, but there are shortcomings
GitHub - ciscoheat/sveltekit-flash-message: Send temporary data after redirect, usually from endpoints. Works with both SSR and client.
Send temporary data after redirect, usually from endpoints. Works with both SSR and client. - ciscoheat/sveltekit-flash-message
jvp.sh
November 24, 2025 at 3:45 AM
jvp.sh/yQgsYh7R
The cookie thing may have only been command
If you use a form, though, while using enhance and you redirect from the form function itself, the form reset may never get called, which is bad UX if the user goes back there to see their previously filled in and submitted form
The cookie thing may have only been command
If you use a form, though, while using enhance and you redirect from the form function itself, the form reset may never get called, which is bad UX if the user goes back there to see their previously filled in and submitted form
There are definite deficiencies, though. For example, throwing an error reroutes to the nearest +error.svelte instead of simply returning. And not being able to set cookies in certain instances, which makes it difficult to use something like jvp.sh/1Qo7YFZM
They're great, but there are shortcomings
They're great, but there are shortcomings
GitHub - ciscoheat/sveltekit-flash-message: Send temporary data after redirect, usually from endpoints. Works with both SSR and client.
Send temporary data after redirect, usually from endpoints. Works with both SSR and client. - ciscoheat/sveltekit-flash-message
jvp.sh
November 24, 2025 at 2:28 AM
There are definite deficiencies, though. For example, throwing an error reroutes to the nearest +error.svelte instead of simply returning. And not being able to set cookies in certain instances, which makes it difficult to use something like jvp.sh/1Qo7YFZM
They're great, but there are shortcomings
They're great, but there are shortcomings
It will be interesting to see, though, just how much of what he campaigned on he'll manage to get done. There are a lot of people who hold higher office than him who seem to be very determined to obstruct him fairly significantly
November 5, 2025 at 3:16 PM
It will be interesting to see, though, just how much of what he campaigned on he'll manage to get done. There are a lot of people who hold higher office than him who seem to be very determined to obstruct him fairly significantly
It’s anything BUT odd when you think about who was directing people to burn the witches
August 17, 2025 at 3:39 PM
It’s anything BUT odd when you think about who was directing people to burn the witches
It’s fun to randomly say things without actually backing it up
August 10, 2025 at 6:36 PM
It’s fun to randomly say things without actually backing it up
You got me. I actually clicked to see what it would do. Time for bed, I guess
August 7, 2025 at 3:41 AM
You got me. I actually clicked to see what it would do. Time for bed, I guess
Don’t believe everything you read. American media (both traditional and social) gain eyeballs by sensationalizing lots of things. The US is not sliding into authoritarianism. Donald Trump is an imbecile, not a genius authoritarian mastermind
August 7, 2025 at 3:39 AM
Don’t believe everything you read. American media (both traditional and social) gain eyeballs by sensationalizing lots of things. The US is not sliding into authoritarianism. Donald Trump is an imbecile, not a genius authoritarian mastermind
I mean, not really. It’s failing in certain ways but not in the same ways that communism failed under Stalin, for example
August 7, 2025 at 3:32 AM
I mean, not really. It’s failing in certain ways but not in the same ways that communism failed under Stalin, for example
Hypothetically, what if I don’t want to work for the betterment of my neighbors under communism? What happens to me then?
August 7, 2025 at 3:29 AM
Hypothetically, what if I don’t want to work for the betterment of my neighbors under communism? What happens to me then?
The amount of “watch me think I’m doing something impactful while not actually accomplishing a god damn thing” is kind of mind blowing nowadays
August 7, 2025 at 3:21 AM
The amount of “watch me think I’m doing something impactful while not actually accomplishing a god damn thing” is kind of mind blowing nowadays
I so very much want to use this but my mental model is very much set with the “load”/“action” combo. It’ll definitely take a shift to get used to loading data async like this again
August 1, 2025 at 1:27 AM
I so very much want to use this but my mental model is very much set with the “load”/“action” combo. It’ll definitely take a shift to get used to loading data async like this again
Probably a bit more than 3600, amirite?
July 29, 2025 at 3:14 AM
Probably a bit more than 3600, amirite?
It may be semantics, but I don’t know that it “echoes locally” as much as it’s that there’s someone in office who is actually doing what the people elected him to do. It’s almost as if he’s a reflection of the people, not the other way around
Not sure which is more concerning
Not sure which is more concerning
July 29, 2025 at 3:11 AM
It may be semantics, but I don’t know that it “echoes locally” as much as it’s that there’s someone in office who is actually doing what the people elected him to do. It’s almost as if he’s a reflection of the people, not the other way around
Not sure which is more concerning
Not sure which is more concerning
I don’t think anybody thought he was qualified. I just think they thought Kamala was even LESS qualified
July 25, 2025 at 7:01 PM
I don’t think anybody thought he was qualified. I just think they thought Kamala was even LESS qualified
In other news, water is wet
For what it’s worth, the exact same thing happens when something favorable happens for Trump; cnn and msnbc will not cover it. The reverse was also true during the last administration.
For what it’s worth, the exact same thing happens when something favorable happens for Trump; cnn and msnbc will not cover it. The reverse was also true during the last administration.
July 23, 2025 at 10:52 PM
In other news, water is wet
For what it’s worth, the exact same thing happens when something favorable happens for Trump; cnn and msnbc will not cover it. The reverse was also true during the last administration.
For what it’s worth, the exact same thing happens when something favorable happens for Trump; cnn and msnbc will not cover it. The reverse was also true during the last administration.
That said, the men’s players get 50% of REVENUE of ~11.5bn so in theory it shouldn’t matter if the wnba is profitable or not. They should get 50% of the league’s revenue
July 21, 2025 at 11:30 PM
That said, the men’s players get 50% of REVENUE of ~11.5bn so in theory it shouldn’t matter if the wnba is profitable or not. They should get 50% of the league’s revenue
also you seem extraordinarily negative. nobody is forcing you to respond. at no point in time have i been disrespectful to you. i really don’t know where this energy is coming from
July 20, 2025 at 6:06 PM
also you seem extraordinarily negative. nobody is forcing you to respond. at no point in time have i been disrespectful to you. i really don’t know where this energy is coming from
yes every person has bias. i would imagine you, like most of us have an inherent mistrust of major corporations. another interesting thing is your seeming acceptance that there are news organizations out there that are actually unbiased at their core. i mean, i guess that’s more naivety
July 20, 2025 at 6:06 PM
yes every person has bias. i would imagine you, like most of us have an inherent mistrust of major corporations. another interesting thing is your seeming acceptance that there are news organizations out there that are actually unbiased at their core. i mean, i guess that’s more naivety
this response tells me you think there _are _ unbiased news sources out there. i used to be young and naive once, too. ah, the memories
July 20, 2025 at 3:14 PM
this response tells me you think there _are _ unbiased news sources out there. i used to be young and naive once, too. ah, the memories
i mean, it's based a _little_ in reality. i can't think of one news organization that's out there that is actually unbiased. there's no money/ratings in being unbiased and reporting the news.
fox and newsmax gave up pretending to be objective. others have not yet.
fox and newsmax gave up pretending to be objective. others have not yet.
July 20, 2025 at 12:54 PM
i mean, it's based a _little_ in reality. i can't think of one news organization that's out there that is actually unbiased. there's no money/ratings in being unbiased and reporting the news.
fox and newsmax gave up pretending to be objective. others have not yet.
fox and newsmax gave up pretending to be objective. others have not yet.
i'm not trying to offer an opinion on npr. i'm making an observation that is interesting to me.
holy hell, simmer down a bit there, friend. put the guns away for a bit. not everything needs to be a "you're wrong because of this"
holy hell, simmer down a bit there, friend. put the guns away for a bit. not everything needs to be a "you're wrong because of this"
July 20, 2025 at 12:44 PM
i'm not trying to offer an opinion on npr. i'm making an observation that is interesting to me.
holy hell, simmer down a bit there, friend. put the guns away for a bit. not everything needs to be a "you're wrong because of this"
holy hell, simmer down a bit there, friend. put the guns away for a bit. not everything needs to be a "you're wrong because of this"