- Fundamental empirical Deep Learning research
- Visual inductive priors for data efficiency
Web: https://jvgemert.github.io/
(I still make all my slides in Beamer 😅; I once tried remarkjs, which would allow animation, but I didn't get sufficiently proficient in it, and stayed in the latex env 😅)
(I still make all my slides in Beamer 😅; I once tried remarkjs, which would allow animation, but I didn't get sufficiently proficient in it, and stayed in the latex env 😅)
I'll DM you for doing something constructive that I've been thinking about! 🙂
I'll DM you for doing something constructive that I've been thinking about! 🙂
But.. I have been playing devil's advocate and saying:
Unless the papers are fraudulent, these papers are still producing knowledge.. despite such misaligned incentives, no?
But.. I have been playing devil's advocate and saying:
Unless the papers are fraudulent, these papers are still producing knowledge.. despite such misaligned incentives, no?
What operational, ie, significant, downstream difference will this difference make?
Making differences that make no difference is perhaps better left to the philosophers? They have no need of empiricism.
What operational, ie, significant, downstream difference will this difference make?
Making differences that make no difference is perhaps better left to the philosophers? They have no need of empiricism.
"A difference that makes no difference is no difference."
Platonification will not help, no?
Nearest Neighbors isn't "learning", but, so what? :)
"A difference that makes no difference is no difference."
Platonification will not help, no?
Nearest Neighbors isn't "learning", but, so what? :)
I wanted to do the same, but the rain, well, rained on my parade 😅
I wanted to do the same, but the rain, well, rained on my parade 😅
Are the original GPUs still around somewhere? 🤔
Are the original GPUs still around somewhere? 🤔
Because.. In my opinion, at the moment this thread is too much about publicly shaming people, and not enough about arguing against the claims made.
Because.. In my opinion, at the moment this thread is too much about publicly shaming people, and not enough about arguing against the claims made.
Also the Deep Image Prior comes to mind; ie: the bias in the architecture 🙂
If I may ask, for the brain, do you think the priors are learned? Or hard-coded (evolution)? 🤔
Also the Deep Image Prior comes to mind; ie: the bias in the architecture 🙂
If I may ask, for the brain, do you think the priors are learned? Or hard-coded (evolution)? 🤔
www.argmin.net
www.argmin.net
And how do we do Classical time keeping (?)
- 10 years BA (Before Alexnet)
- 10 years AM (After Marr)
- ... (?)
And how do we do Classical time keeping (?)
- 10 years BA (Before Alexnet)
- 10 years AM (After Marr)
- ... (?)
Yann knew this all along!
Yann knew this all along!
- Heinlein's books, if you haven't already 🙂
- Daemon
- Dragon's egg (yes, scifi, not fantasy 🙂)
Peter Watts I also recommend 🙂
- Heinlein's books, if you haven't already 🙂
- Daemon
- Dragon's egg (yes, scifi, not fantasy 🙂)
Peter Watts I also recommend 🙂
- long way to a small angry planet
- Klara and the Sun
- A psalm for the wild built, loved this robot tale
- Anathem, starts slow, but ends 🤯
- A wild sheep chase, by Murakami
- The science of Discworld, I liked a lot, albeit "science fantasy" 😊
- long way to a small angry planet
- Klara and the Sun
- A psalm for the wild built, loved this robot tale
- Anathem, starts slow, but ends 🤯
- A wild sheep chase, by Murakami
- The science of Discworld, I liked a lot, albeit "science fantasy" 😊