Prev: co-founded #LabelRadar (acq.)
If users could be limited by the pre-made recipes not being powerful enough – you can pretty much do anything now.
Finally back on the routine, it's time to play with Shared Compression Dictionaries now!
If users could be limited by the pre-made recipes not being powerful enough – you can pretty much do anything now.
Finally back on the routine, it's time to play with Shared Compression Dictionaries now!
It's the only feature free users can't access yet.
Mainly because I'd want to make sure it can't be abused for anything bad, but also because I absolutely *misunderstood* Workers for Platforms pricing until just now.
Should I open it up?
It's the only feature free users can't access yet.
Mainly because I'd want to make sure it can't be abused for anything bad, but also because I absolutely *misunderstood* Workers for Platforms pricing until just now.
Should I open it up?
The video uses the most trivial example (pun intended), but there's only a few extra secs on top of what the page took to load.
Will this be the case with 00s of users? Would love to find out!
The video uses the most trivial example (pun intended), but there's only a few extra secs on top of what the page took to load.
Will this be the case with 00s of users? Would love to find out!
You can build your own now! It's a bit daunting but actually pretty fun.
More focus on real user data? Less? Remove % scores? Or make your own?
You can build your own now! It's a bit daunting but actually pretty fun.
More focus on real user data? Less? Remove % scores? Or make your own?
You can copy and paste any widgets from docs and it works seamlessly.
You can share these with stakeholders/colleagues and make sure you're all focusing on the same view (and not getting distracted by noise).
You can copy and paste any widgets from docs and it works seamlessly.
You can share these with stakeholders/colleagues and make sure you're all focusing on the same view (and not getting distracted by noise).
Am I missing lots of audits/widgets? Yes.
But I'm mostly missing a few more folks who don't mind helping me with *candid* feedback and/or see themselves using it!
Let me know if that's you! 🫵
Am I missing lots of audits/widgets? Yes.
But I'm mostly missing a few more folks who don't mind helping me with *candid* feedback and/or see themselves using it!
Let me know if that's you! 🫵
PageSpeed Insights will show them as default in ~Oct 2025, but you can try now.
I just switched my widget to Insights (no users = no breaking changes 😄). Def need to work more on the details tho!
PageSpeed Insights will show them as default in ~Oct 2025, but you can try now.
I just switched my widget to Insights (no users = no breaking changes 😄). Def need to work more on the details tho!
If you want to try it out (and provide feedback) please DM me! It's live but for now will share privately to see how some things (e.g. tests) scale
If you want to try it out (and provide feedback) please DM me! It's live but for now will share privately to see how some things (e.g. tests) scale
Pulls CrUX + PSI + Puppeteer (for user journeys with Chrome DevTools Recorder). Run multiple tests to see variability or multiple pages to compare one another.
You can build (and share) your own dashboards. Made plenty of widgets but the more the merrier!
Pulls CrUX + PSI + Puppeteer (for user journeys with Chrome DevTools Recorder). Run multiple tests to see variability or multiple pages to compare one another.
You can build (and share) your own dashboards. Made plenty of widgets but the more the merrier!
1. MODIFY. Change anything on any URL to validate ideas (like WPT Experiments but you get the URLs to profile).
My goal is to really push the concept forward, but so far I've focused mostly on easier recipes
1. MODIFY. Change anything on any URL to validate ideas (like WPT Experiments but you get the URLs to profile).
My goal is to really push the concept forward, but so far I've focused mostly on easier recipes
I'm not personally using Motion but I still got a LOT of insights and tips.
And I'm having a lot of fun humbly using some of those on my own work!
I'm not personally using Motion but I still got a LOT of insights and tips.
And I'm having a lot of fun humbly using some of those on my own work!
Super fun website – very interesting navigation!
----
🏆 Today’s typ.ing:
🌟 Speed: 153wpm
🎯 Accuracy: 100.00%
📝 Training Set: English, most common 100 words
🔢 Capitalization: ❌ Numbers: ❌ Punctuation: ❌
Super fun website – very interesting navigation!
----
🏆 Today’s typ.ing:
🌟 Speed: 153wpm
🎯 Accuracy: 100.00%
📝 Training Set: English, most common 100 words
🔢 Capitalization: ❌ Numbers: ❌ Punctuation: ❌
Absolutely fantastic work from the Chrome team, it's hard to describe how extremely useful it is to get this level of UX insight on almost any website, for free and without having to previously convince clients to setup monitoring
Absolutely fantastic work from the Chrome team, it's hard to describe how extremely useful it is to get this level of UX insight on almost any website, for free and without having to previously convince clients to setup monitoring
TBC on how accurate (this is PSI's Lighthouse, should also be compat with CF Workers Puppeteer and probably more accurate but screencasts have a weird gamma offset unfortunately).
TBC on how accurate (this is PSI's Lighthouse, should also be compat with CF Workers Puppeteer and probably more accurate but screencasts have a weird gamma offset unfortunately).
There's no way it's DNS.
It was DNS.
There's no way it's DNS.
It was DNS.
"Practical UI" by Adham Dannaway was another good read on design.
Great insights on how designing with a11y in mind ends up benefitting everyone & minimizing usability risk (see ALT)
"Practical UI" by Adham Dannaway was another good read on design.
Great insights on how designing with a11y in mind ends up benefitting everyone & minimizing usability risk (see ALT)
Similar to LCP subparts (with less insights of course) but from any website in CrUX instead of requiring real user monitoring
Similar to LCP subparts (with less insights of course) but from any website in CrUX instead of requiring real user monitoring
Started 2025 with a re-read and here's a great tip: *everything has an intended size*.
As an example, don't scale icons up nor down – you can enclose them for upscaling (or simplify if downscaling)
Started 2025 with a re-read and here's a great tip: *everything has an intended size*.
As an example, don't scale icons up nor down – you can enclose them for upscaling (or simplify if downscaling)
Pages uploads each file to KV (max file size 25 MB) with likely aggressive TTLs, because they also upload a manifest of files into KV too (hence the max 20k files restriction) which serves as the instant source of truth
2/N
Pages uploads each file to KV (max file size 25 MB) with likely aggressive TTLs, because they also upload a manifest of files into KV too (hence the max 20k files restriction) which serves as the instant source of truth
2/N
I've been recently having lots of fun with a simple monochromatic palette, that users can actually fully customize.
Absolutely inspired by GitHub and Linear's efforts on this front.
I've been recently having lots of fun with a simple monochromatic palette, that users can actually fully customize.
Absolutely inspired by GitHub and Linear's efforts on this front.
According to HTTPArchive data as of Nov 24, Preact is detected 3.7x times more than Angular and almost 0.85x compared to Vue
Without any data to back this - I'd bet on more 3P widgets shipping Preact (which is a great choice given their lower overhead)
According to HTTPArchive data as of Nov 24, Preact is detected 3.7x times more than Angular and almost 0.85x compared to Vue
Without any data to back this - I'd bet on more 3P widgets shipping Preact (which is a great choice given their lower overhead)