Jacqueline Sweet
banner
jsweetli.bsky.social
Jacqueline Sweet
@jsweetli.bsky.social
Once censored by Elon Musk bc I did a journalism
Signal: JSweetLI.61
Words in Rolling Stone, The Guardian, The Intercept, Drop Site News, The Handbasket, POLITICO, The Nation

https://jacquelinesweet.substack.com/
I always forget there’s a quora guy lol
November 14, 2025 at 8:24 PM
lmao muting you, bc this is nonsense
November 14, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Gait analysis is not used this way in court at all. Not to identify people. It’s supplemental
November 14, 2025 at 3:21 PM
Very possible
November 14, 2025 at 2:56 PM
We don’t know yet!
November 14, 2025 at 2:54 PM
He’s everywhere
November 14, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Some I can't 100% identify:

Someone named John Mather who may in fact be the astrophysicist judging by his follow list and the fact Epstein funded some related research

A couple others I don't name because they seem like random people.
November 14, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Alan Dlugash, accountant and wealth advisor
Steven Cantor, movie producer
Gabriel Erem, Lifestyles Magazine founder and friend of 27-year-Mossad agent Peter Malkin

NOTE: This doesn't mean these people did anything wrong! Epstein was funding all types of tech and academic stuff back then.
November 14, 2025 at 2:09 PM
People who followed Epstein:

Jean-François Gariépy, a white nationalist YouTuber and podcast host who said Epstein once gave him 25K
Landon Thomas, Jr. of the New York Times
Daniel Rosenberg, movie producer
Jim Rutt of the Santa Fe Institute /
November 14, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Rod Furlan (AI/tech founder)

Erik Wachtmeister (Swedish founder of A Small World social networking club, also in Epstein's black book) /
November 14, 2025 at 2:09 PM
He did prey upon 13 year olds. We know that from victim testimony under oath. They did not look legal age to others. Leaving aside everything else she’s saying she’s just factually wrong on all of this too.
November 13, 2025 at 11:59 PM
I need to know who was paid to do this. And I also think it’s a problem people are paid a lot to be so bad at their jobs. (For the people who on cue appear to yell at me for caring about truth and credibility and competence when it’s about Democrats)
November 13, 2025 at 11:12 PM
They didn’t have thanksgiving together. But yeah talk to me condescendingly. Eric ????????
November 13, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Yeah, no, because fumbling very easy shit and spreading fake news means the real stuff gets discredited and it matters. I will never stop believing that, sorry.
November 13, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Eva is a person he spent thanksgiving with Eva Dubin
November 13, 2025 at 10:50 PM
I think it’s obvious, to anyone with a good ability to read with some educated context. So the politicians and consultants should have been able to. I just don’t agree that it’s too hard to understand sorry.
November 13, 2025 at 10:45 PM
A whole bunch of elected Dems shared it en masse after The Democrats did
November 13, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Such a fumble when they were given a wealth of material
November 13, 2025 at 10:35 PM
It’s unreal sometimes
November 13, 2025 at 10:35 PM
Oh shit they deleted. Now all the electeds look silly
November 13, 2025 at 10:34 PM
It wasn’t organic. Dem electeds are clearly sharing top down. What a mess
November 13, 2025 at 10:28 PM