Josh Lehn
@joshlehn.bsky.social
Autistic Father 🧩 Economy enthusiast ⚖️Career Laborer 💪 Athlete Lover 🚴♀️Science Nerd 🧬 Farm Family 🌾Master Chef 👨🏻🍳 Trying to pull people to the center to embrace the power of compromise. 🤝 Pro Choice 🚺Pro Woman 🇵🇸Pro Palestine 💵Pro thrifty
Also, I don’t mean strictly cheese. I meant that the game sells broken counters that you really are supposed to use. Cazador isn’t a safe fight unless you skip the intro scene. Raphael’s pillars have 99 hp: Disintegrate does 50-100(100-200 to vulnerable). Seems too coincidental.
July 20, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Also, I don’t mean strictly cheese. I meant that the game sells broken counters that you really are supposed to use. Cazador isn’t a safe fight unless you skip the intro scene. Raphael’s pillars have 99 hp: Disintegrate does 50-100(100-200 to vulnerable). Seems too coincidental.
I have had 4 honour modes end in failure because I try too much. Last time I screwed up at Halsin retrieving thaniel. I killed like 70 shadows and it still wasn’t enough to stop a collapse.
July 20, 2025 at 5:01 PM
I have had 4 honour modes end in failure because I try too much. Last time I screwed up at Halsin retrieving thaniel. I killed like 70 shadows and it still wasn’t enough to stop a collapse.
Like the game but there’s a way to totally cheese every fight. Killed Raphael by disintegrating the 4 pillars before he even had a turn, saved Hope’s sister. Danced the vampire and kept Asterion away from the fight. Got Orin stuck in the Arch to her bedroom so she was stuck not attacking at all lol.
July 1, 2025 at 8:08 PM
Like the game but there’s a way to totally cheese every fight. Killed Raphael by disintegrating the 4 pillars before he even had a turn, saved Hope’s sister. Danced the vampire and kept Asterion away from the fight. Got Orin stuck in the Arch to her bedroom so she was stuck not attacking at all lol.
I used to buy about $50 of fish a week in Chicago in 2004, and that included whole yellowtail mackerel so 🤷🏻♂️.
I’ve had some pretty good sushi, but I’m also a trained Le Cordon Bleu chef and always prefer some thrift. $69-80 at a restaurant makes me think I could be hosting an amazing woman at home.
I’ve had some pretty good sushi, but I’m also a trained Le Cordon Bleu chef and always prefer some thrift. $69-80 at a restaurant makes me think I could be hosting an amazing woman at home.
March 8, 2025 at 11:36 PM
I used to buy about $50 of fish a week in Chicago in 2004, and that included whole yellowtail mackerel so 🤷🏻♂️.
I’ve had some pretty good sushi, but I’m also a trained Le Cordon Bleu chef and always prefer some thrift. $69-80 at a restaurant makes me think I could be hosting an amazing woman at home.
I’ve had some pretty good sushi, but I’m also a trained Le Cordon Bleu chef and always prefer some thrift. $69-80 at a restaurant makes me think I could be hosting an amazing woman at home.
Eh. I think they believe in the future of Fission Nuclear Energy and mechanical terraforming, and possibly the idea of there still being a molten core. There’s lots of water: Oxygen can be extrapolated forcefully. I do agree with span and scale. We practically need Star trek level mega ships.
March 8, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Eh. I think they believe in the future of Fission Nuclear Energy and mechanical terraforming, and possibly the idea of there still being a molten core. There’s lots of water: Oxygen can be extrapolated forcefully. I do agree with span and scale. We practically need Star trek level mega ships.
Exhorbitant. I can buy the salmon for 20 for about $13. Rice: $.50-1.00. Prep isn’t hard with knife skills. Just need quality Seafood. Tuna is a little more, but finished good is… paying a markup
March 8, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Exhorbitant. I can buy the salmon for 20 for about $13. Rice: $.50-1.00. Prep isn’t hard with knife skills. Just need quality Seafood. Tuna is a little more, but finished good is… paying a markup
You do realize that chart suggests linear GDP growth, so it’s rather not genuine to associate it with policy. Manufacturing be manufacturing. Wait until Q2-Q3 after inventories take a hit.
February 18, 2025 at 8:21 AM
You do realize that chart suggests linear GDP growth, so it’s rather not genuine to associate it with policy. Manufacturing be manufacturing. Wait until Q2-Q3 after inventories take a hit.
I’ve tried that. Doesn’t work. Very well, because the person I love is a Dismissive Avoidant with addiction issues. They innately distrust love, distrust anything said. They want “show me.” Unfortunately she’s 6000 miles away.
February 18, 2025 at 8:16 AM
I’ve tried that. Doesn’t work. Very well, because the person I love is a Dismissive Avoidant with addiction issues. They innately distrust love, distrust anything said. They want “show me.” Unfortunately she’s 6000 miles away.
I agree. However, a lot of people get drawn back, including me, because realistically engagement on X is a greater educator of the stubborn, and X is actively moving policy. Thus, activists are stuck there, fighting a dissident majority.
February 17, 2025 at 9:59 AM
I agree. However, a lot of people get drawn back, including me, because realistically engagement on X is a greater educator of the stubborn, and X is actively moving policy. Thus, activists are stuck there, fighting a dissident majority.
How do you shape public opinion when you don’t have the pulpit, the media funding, or control of oversight?
February 14, 2025 at 2:47 AM
How do you shape public opinion when you don’t have the pulpit, the media funding, or control of oversight?
What choice do they have? Delay a vote one day on bills that don’t exist to hold a Republican accountable against a Republican Congress and Republican President with a Republican Court?
February 5, 2025 at 5:23 AM
What choice do they have? Delay a vote one day on bills that don’t exist to hold a Republican accountable against a Republican Congress and Republican President with a Republican Court?
It’s not really a trait of Capitalism but of bad managers. Most Capitalists view productivity incentives as being profit maximizing. Workers at 60% output aren’t as profitable as workers motivated to give 95%
February 5, 2025 at 5:01 AM
It’s not really a trait of Capitalism but of bad managers. Most Capitalists view productivity incentives as being profit maximizing. Workers at 60% output aren’t as profitable as workers motivated to give 95%
There’s literally nothing they can do 55/45, especially vs EO’s
February 3, 2025 at 10:27 PM
There’s literally nothing they can do 55/45, especially vs EO’s
Not much they can do. EO doesn’t have a legislative process, 2 Democrats are Republicans, and it’s faster to let him fall on his face.
February 3, 2025 at 10:25 PM
Not much they can do. EO doesn’t have a legislative process, 2 Democrats are Republicans, and it’s faster to let him fall on his face.
You’re nuts. Everyone is an enemy to you. I wouldn’t try to explain this with you if I didn’t care. LGBTQ doesn’t have to be a party line issue. 47 Dem 13 Republican votes would be more powerful and long lasting than trying to just seek progressives
January 27, 2025 at 4:24 AM
You’re nuts. Everyone is an enemy to you. I wouldn’t try to explain this with you if I didn’t care. LGBTQ doesn’t have to be a party line issue. 47 Dem 13 Republican votes would be more powerful and long lasting than trying to just seek progressives
Technically plutocratic socialism mirrors Capitalism in what it does to a citizenship with two major exceptions: Socialism locks in poverty and less opportunity for advancement and 2) The wealthy are chosen by the administration. Capitalism: anyone can become wealthy, many choose not to.
January 27, 2025 at 4:20 AM
Technically plutocratic socialism mirrors Capitalism in what it does to a citizenship with two major exceptions: Socialism locks in poverty and less opportunity for advancement and 2) The wealthy are chosen by the administration. Capitalism: anyone can become wealthy, many choose not to.
Not really but I think it’s sad when groups abandon supporters because politics is more complicated than a single issue. Bottom line: survival means legislative and electoral victories. Survival isn’t possible without finding a way to get both those things. Hybrid Capitalism is what works in RW.
January 27, 2025 at 3:59 AM
Not really but I think it’s sad when groups abandon supporters because politics is more complicated than a single issue. Bottom line: survival means legislative and electoral victories. Survival isn’t possible without finding a way to get both those things. Hybrid Capitalism is what works in RW.
Nah. I made a comment about surviving and thriving regardless of what administration you are under. More far left people are extremely poor because they spend so much energy fighting a system they forget to fund themselves. There’s nothing wrong with being a millionaire progressive
January 27, 2025 at 3:46 AM
Nah. I made a comment about surviving and thriving regardless of what administration you are under. More far left people are extremely poor because they spend so much energy fighting a system they forget to fund themselves. There’s nothing wrong with being a millionaire progressive
I’m far from neutral. I sit on X and here trying to get people to realize where the largest voting block actually is, and how to use it to gain progressive victories . I want a more even USSC, even 1 seat Liberal. I want a Liberal Majority Leader and Speaker of the House.
January 27, 2025 at 3:42 AM
I’m far from neutral. I sit on X and here trying to get people to realize where the largest voting block actually is, and how to use it to gain progressive victories . I want a more even USSC, even 1 seat Liberal. I want a Liberal Majority Leader and Speaker of the House.
I’m an economist. Socialism is impossible and will never exist because it requires 100% consensus, loss of autonomy, and a complex governance by peers which isn’t humanly possible. If a system can’t be means tested, it’s not worth supporting because it harms too. Hybrid Economies do better.
January 27, 2025 at 3:37 AM
I’m an economist. Socialism is impossible and will never exist because it requires 100% consensus, loss of autonomy, and a complex governance by peers which isn’t humanly possible. If a system can’t be means tested, it’s not worth supporting because it harms too. Hybrid Economies do better.
That all depends on what metric we are looking at. By GDP, Democrats do generally perform well. By nonunion participation wages and gas prices and farmers who haven’t seen prices increases in 30 years, tend to favor Republicans. Biden’s was tough on 2% raise Factories while other jobs grew $20k
January 27, 2025 at 3:30 AM
That all depends on what metric we are looking at. By GDP, Democrats do generally perform well. By nonunion participation wages and gas prices and farmers who haven’t seen prices increases in 30 years, tend to favor Republicans. Biden’s was tough on 2% raise Factories while other jobs grew $20k
They are typically Economically conservative but Socially liberal.
January 27, 2025 at 3:18 AM
They are typically Economically conservative but Socially liberal.
Do you know that between 68-31% of Republicans actually support various LGBTQ agendas? Those votes do not matter toward protecting your rights though; LGBTQ both spend time blaming while those voters vote economy. What would happen if Economy was a homogeneous topic both parties treated equally?
January 27, 2025 at 3:16 AM
Do you know that between 68-31% of Republicans actually support various LGBTQ agendas? Those votes do not matter toward protecting your rights though; LGBTQ both spend time blaming while those voters vote economy. What would happen if Economy was a homogeneous topic both parties treated equally?
You keep misreading. You can’t change the electoral voting base. It’s stupid to try to push a political position no one will vote for. It’s smarter to ease them into accepting it, and offend less, and actually win elections instead of surviving in between the other party’s failures
January 27, 2025 at 3:11 AM
You keep misreading. You can’t change the electoral voting base. It’s stupid to try to push a political position no one will vote for. It’s smarter to ease them into accepting it, and offend less, and actually win elections instead of surviving in between the other party’s failures
Nah she would have lost more votes as a far leaning liberal. There’s nothing attractive about Socialism or that fixes the economy to 87% of Americans in the far left Agenda. Trump doing OT/Tips/Tax elimination was something an inflation period candidate couldn’t overcome.
January 27, 2025 at 3:03 AM
Nah she would have lost more votes as a far leaning liberal. There’s nothing attractive about Socialism or that fixes the economy to 87% of Americans in the far left Agenda. Trump doing OT/Tips/Tax elimination was something an inflation period candidate couldn’t overcome.