Hey, @facethenation.bsky.social, face the facts.

Just the right specs for the job. 👓 ✅

Thanks for putting this list together! Super-helpful!

Please add me! I am late to the party but have started publishing work in this vein. Thanks!

And special thanks to @fahadrajput.bsky.social, of course! You sir are a gentleman and a scholar.

Many thanks to those who gave feedback on the remarks I gave at VMI that led to this paper, to those who commented on the draft I presented at West Point, and especially to @patrickrhamey.bsky.social and Spencer Bakich for shepherding the volume to completion. 6/6
Cheers!🥂

Our recommendations are not likely to be adopted by Trump 2.0. But we stand by our position that the US has the capacity to play a leadership role, and should use that capacity to dampen regional military competition and reduce the emissions that exacerbate climate change. 5/6

...should take a leading role in reducing carbon emissions in military domains. While complete military decarbonization is an unattainable goal, we applaud efforts to move to reduce carbon emissions and urge additional commitments in this direction. 4/6

We assert that the U.S. should not be tempted by a maximalist version of 'restraint'. Instead, for reasons we explain in the chapter, the U.S. should maintain its forward-deployed military presence but exercise restraint in wielding those capabilities, and... 3/6

In the chapter we lay out an argument for what we call 'sustainable strategic adjustment' to meet the challenges of managing regional competition and the climate crisis. 2/6

Nope. Welcome!

Kim thanks for your note — never have I wanted an “Edit Post” option more than in that moment! And I don’t condemn any industry per se — would just like to see everyone doing their part.

Sorry, the doublespeak in the article is from the meat industry. My bad.