https://www.hogrefe.com/eu/journal/journal-of-media-psychology
Included in our latest is a special section including articles from the 2025 Moral Media Conference. Articles address ChatGPT-generated stories, smoking campaign messaging, and language driving USA tensions toward China.
econtent.hogrefe.com/toc/zmp/37/6
Included in our latest is a special section including articles from the 2025 Moral Media Conference. Articles address ChatGPT-generated stories, smoking campaign messaging, and language driving USA tensions toward China.
econtent.hogrefe.com/toc/zmp/37/6
www.hogrefe.com/us/journal/j...
www.hogrefe.com/us/journal/j...
Ellanore is a second-year graduate student in the school of communication master’s program at Illinois State U, and they started working as JMP's editorial assistant in September.
Submitters will encounter Ellanore for intial manuscript processing.
Ellanore is a second-year graduate student in the school of communication master’s program at Illinois State U, and they started working as JMP's editorial assistant in September.
Submitters will encounter Ellanore for intial manuscript processing.
The James E. Kirk Professor of Communication at Florida State University, Dr. Bailey's research is "rooted in biological and evolutionary perspectives," typically focusing on media in the health context.
The James E. Kirk Professor of Communication at Florida State University, Dr. Bailey's research is "rooted in biological and evolutionary perspectives," typically focusing on media in the health context.
www.theatlantic.com/family/2025/...
www.theatlantic.com/family/2025/...
📄 doi.org/10.1027/1864...
📝 OA osf.io/preprints/ps...
📄 doi.org/10.1027/1864...
📝 OA osf.io/preprints/ps...
docs.google.com/document/d/1...
docs.google.com/document/d/1...
What's leading to desk rejects? A mix of lack-of-fit with a lot of causal analyses (i.e., SEM) or correlational data.
What's leading to desk rejects? A mix of lack-of-fit with a lot of causal analyses (i.e., SEM) or correlational data.
This even goes for editorial decisions. We get it: we reject 90% of manuscripts. If you'd like more information - or maybe you just want to vent - it's okay. =)
This even goes for editorial decisions. We get it: we reject 90% of manuscripts. If you'd like more information - or maybe you just want to vent - it's okay. =)
She’s been one of our most reliable and robust peer commentators, who is especially keen to catching the “small-yet-critical” details of a theoretical argument or study design.
She’s been one of our most reliable and robust peer commentators, who is especially keen to catching the “small-yet-critical” details of a theoretical argument or study design.
#JMP wants to thank him for “pushing the boundaries of open science and advocate for greater transparency and openness.” We believe the authors are appreciative of making the peer review process more of an open dialogue.
#JMP wants to thank him for “pushing the boundaries of open science and advocate for greater transparency and openness.” We believe the authors are appreciative of making the peer review process more of an open dialogue.
We will spotlight five "Reviewers of the Year" below, all were nominated by more than one of our editors.
We will spotlight five "Reviewers of the Year" below, all were nominated by more than one of our editors.
For 2024, eighteen people were selected, below!
For 2024, eighteen people were selected, below!