You should try reading comments on Imgur!

Some of them want to abuse you

All of them will disabuse you (of that notion)

[5] Synth line uses Flow (Sean Luke) github.com/eclab/flow
[6] Vocoder is Logic Pro EVOC
[7] Lyrics where the narrator dreams about a heist going wrong: Kate Bush, "There Goes A Tenner"

Bibliography:
[1] Intro texture and fade-up: Metallica, "Orion"
[2] Drum hitch: Stone Roses, "I Wanna Be Adored" and Cranberries, "Dreams"
[3] Kick/snare inversion: The Cars, "Just What I Needed"
[4] Chord sequence played on Tonnetz (Euler, 1739) implementation at thetonnetz.com

Bono is an easy target and whatever about the UK, I bet a lot of Irish people would line up to say they agree with this article. I think he's brilliant.

Scalar mappings seem wrong. I think length, volume, mass, and time all map differently.

Maybe itinerant fish intermittently school in the intertidal zone underneath the waves of engagement

Itinerant -> intermittent

There you go, the kind of engagement we all long for

Ah ok. Obvious in retrospect.

Yes, I agree. Intellectual tasks turned out to be "easy" because iterating in software is so much faster.

Kind of sad, isn't it? I wanted AI to do the housework.

Thought experiment: compare (1) an end-to-end LLM reading a problem statement and providing an answer, versus (2) translate the problem to PKN, then run formal reasoning over the PKN, then translate the result back to English.

My intuition says a good LLM will win this.

Maybe the PKN becomes a symbolic layer, a bit like the system 2. But LLMs already have words (system 2) on top of their statistical/lower-level vectors (system 1). I'm not convinced that reasoning in PKN can do better than reasoning in LLMs.

In a way, it's weird that we are still trying initiatives like this. We've already shown that LLMs are sufficient for a lot of reasoning, and moreover, anyway, are necessary (translating PKN to/from English is a job for LLMs, not for humans).

What does "durable" mean here?

Congratulations!

I just saw Thomas Riker try to bluff his doppelgänger Will in 5-card draw, and fail dismally (TNG season 6). Not entertaining except as sadism, 2/10.

Lots of people do dismiss concerns, and in fact two main sets of concerned people dismiss each other's concerns. The point here is that Ethan does not.

Your comment is toxic and deserves a block.