Views are my own (but think what it says about society that I have to say that...)
I know some of this is survivor bias but I'm amazed at the depth of the theory (given the limited data) in the 60s and 70s classics
If analysis was still done by hand we'd think a lot more deeply before analyzing
I know some of this is survivor bias but I'm amazed at the depth of the theory (given the limited data) in the 60s and 70s classics
If analysis was still done by hand we'd think a lot more deeply before analyzing
RN neurons are excited by some movements, inhibited by others
Their responses are kinematically precise
M1 shows no directional tuning at P24
So in P24 rats:
Motor cortex? Still learning
Red nucleus? Still doing
M1 isn’t motor yet, but it’s close.
What happens after P24? Stay tuned...
RN neurons are excited by some movements, inhibited by others
Their responses are kinematically precise
M1 shows no directional tuning at P24
So in P24 rats:
Motor cortex? Still learning
Red nucleus? Still doing
M1 isn’t motor yet, but it’s close.
What happens after P24? Stay tuned...
So we asked: Which neurons encode movement trajectory?
Answer: RN wins again.
“Tuned” M1 neurons only care about how big the movement was. But RN neurons? Nearly all the tuned ones cared about both size and direction.
So we asked: Which neurons encode movement trajectory?
Answer: RN wins again.
“Tuned” M1 neurons only care about how big the movement was. But RN neurons? Nearly all the tuned ones cared about both size and direction.
RN neurons weren’t just responsive. They were selective.
Take one RN neuron: Some wake movements (bilateral facial grooming) made it fire like crazy. Others suppressed it.
What about M1?
RN neurons weren’t just responsive. They were selective.
Take one RN neuron: Some wake movements (bilateral facial grooming) made it fire like crazy. Others suppressed it.
What about M1?