@CentroCOES |
Con todas las fuerzas de la historia
Network segregation matters most in contexts of low to moderate inequality.
Network segregation matters most in contexts of low to moderate inequality.
Working-class support stays stable with homogeneous networks, while service-class support increases redistributive preferences.
Working-class support stays stable with homogeneous networks, while service-class support increases redistributive preferences.
These patterns reflect distinct relational experiences:
Working-class networks expose individuals to greater economic vulnerability, reinforcing redistributive preferences.
Service-class networks strengthen class, increasing distance from those in despair, reducing demand for redistribution.
These patterns reflect distinct relational experiences:
Working-class networks expose individuals to greater economic vulnerability, reinforcing redistributive preferences.
Service-class networks strengthen class, increasing distance from those in despair, reducing demand for redistribution.
Micro-level findings (Figure 1):
Within the working class, having predominantly same-class networks is associated with higher support for redistribution.
Within the service class, homogeneous networks are linked to lower support.
Micro-level findings (Figure 1):
Within the working class, having predominantly same-class networks is associated with higher support for redistribution.
Within the service class, homogeneous networks are linked to lower support.