WIRED and The Guardian have produced informative coverage. Here are some examples:

www.wired.com/story/the-tr...

www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

www.wired.com/story/trump-...

www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

Meme coins. They've been around for some time, but 2025 saw the president and first lady each launch their own, showcasing a pump and dump and subsequent backchannel for bribes and corruption.

Amazing! I remember @statto.bsky.social sharing photos from his trip to the Atacama too.

I'm also anxious about proposals for the ARPA-H budget. I hope PROSPR and FRONT will be protected, and there are numerous exciting programs like THEA, NITRO, and others.

@jeremiahdjohns.bsky.social Given your writings on AI's clear negatives but also potential advantages, this virtual event may be of interest to you.

This is also why increasing healthy lifespan by even just one year has enormous benefits economically. Your article insightfully notes countries in Latin America and Africa will face older populations in the coming decades too, making this a global medical problem.
www.nature.com/articles/s43...

As the writeup mentions, wound healing is an important topic in aging biology and will grow in importance as the country continues to become older on average.

How about for every time you interview/write an article on Bryan Johnson, you interview a researcher in the field? Here are a few examples:
@jamienjustice.bsky.social
@statto.bsky.social
@jennifergarrison.bsky.social
@martinbjensen.bsky.social

I'd also recommend interviewing someone critical like Andrew Steele (@statto.bsky.social). There are many researchers who recognize BJ's self-experimentation isn't very medically useful. The public would be well-served to learn about real medical research targeting aspects of the biology of aging.