Jakob-Moritz Eberl
LightNews LightNews
banner
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Jakob-Moritz Eberl
@jamoeberl.bsky.social
10K followers 1K following 7K posts
He / Him | Senior Scientist in Political Communication at @univie.ac.at | #AUTNES 🇦🇹 | #ACPP 💉 | #MEDem 🗳️ @medem.bsky.social.
Posts in 🇦🇹/🇺🇸 about Research, Elections, Public Health, & (Social)Media – sometimes BoardGames 🎲 or Birds 🐦
Posts Replies Media Videos
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Heute beim Panel „Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Reach?“ auf der #ConsciousCommunicationConference des #PlatonInstituts
Wie frei ist unsere Meinungsbildung, wenn Plattformlogiken Aufmerksamkeit statt Argumente belohnen? Welche Rolle spielen populistische Akteur:innen? Und wo sind die #Gegennarrative?
Ein Konferenzsaal mit einer Bühne, auf der drei schwarze Stühle und kleine Holztische mit Wasserflaschen stehen. Im Vordergrund steht eine Kamera auf einem Stativ, die auf die Bühne gerichtet ist. Auf der Leinwand und den Bannern ist der Konferenztitel zu lesen: „It’s the Attention Economy, Stupid! – First Conscious Communication Conference, 5. November 2025, Wien“.
November 5, 2025 at 8:21 PM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
In der aktuellen Ausgabe von #aviso #DGPUK habe ich über meine bisherige wissenschaftliche Laufbahn gesprochen, die Bedeutung von öffentlicher Kommunikation, internationale Kooperationen – und darüber warum unbefristete Mittelbaustellen keine Fabelwesen sein sollten. 🦄
Magazininterview mit Jakob-Moritz Eberl über Wissenschaft als Beruf. Schwarz-weiß-Porträt links, Interviewtext rechts.
November 5, 2025 at 6:34 PM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Well, I guess I am most surprised about the 850.000 that still voted Cuomo. 🫠
Graphic showing projected results of the New York City mayoral race. Headline reads “Projected Winner: Zohran Mamdani wins the New York City mayor race.” Results table lists three candidates: • Zohran Mamdani (D) – 1,035,646 votes, 50.4% (highlighted in blue with a check mark). • Andrew Cuomo (I) – 854,783 votes, 41.6%. • Curtis Sliwa (R) – 146,127 votes, 7.1%. Total votes: 2,055,283. Note at the bottom: “90.5% expected votes in (Est. remaining 216,000).”
November 5, 2025 at 5:10 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Welche Artikel auf Wiki- & Grokipedia sind sich am ähnlich & welche ganz anders?
Nun – Elon Musk, Tesla & Neuralink sind quasi Kopien.
Transgender rights oder Climate change hingegen kaum.
Ein Schelm, wer da eine pol. Agenda vermutet 👀

Von @tahayasseri.bsky.social mehr hier: osf.io/preprints/so...
Tabelle mit dem Titel „Most and least similar article pairs between GrokiPedia and Wikipedia, ranked by composite similarity“. Die obere Hälfte listet die fünf ähnlichsten Artikel: Elon Musk (Ähnlichkeit 0.96) Tesla, Inc. (0.94) Neuralink (0.93) Twitter (0.91) Artificial intelligence (0.90) Die untere Hälfte zeigt die am wenigsten ähnlichen Artikel: 378 Gender identity (0.38), 379 Adolf Hitler (0.36), 380 COVID-19 pandemic (0.34), 381 Climate change (0.31), 382 Transgender rights (0.28).
November 1, 2025 at 6:01 PM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
The Bluesky icon on my phone changed. And I don’t like it.
Screenshot of from my phone. Different social platforms’ icons. Bluesky Icon now with some 3D effect.
October 30, 2025 at 7:39 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Every season with new house rules that will make it „the most dramatic season yet“.

Btw. My favorite season is going to be The #RitterSport one. Make #TraubenNuss chocolate 🍫 and chill out.
A special edition box of Die Siedler von Catan (The Settlers of Catan) titled “Der Schokoladenmarkt,” a collaboration with Ritter Sport. The red and yellow box features an illustration of two medieval-style traders exchanging chocolate bars at a market stall, with the Ritter Sport logo prominently displayed in the center. The Kosmos publisher logo appears on the side.
October 22, 2025 at 5:20 PM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Ooooh. Und ein Bild habe ich jetzt auch noch schnell erstellt. 😍
Mein Profilbild. Lächelnd. Umrandet mit einer "Ich unterstütze KOBUK!" Vignette.
October 22, 2025 at 3:13 PM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Hey! Look what's now out in print! And I am very happy to see that #Altmetrics currently logs our paper at 5000+ views and 6 citations already. 🤗 @digitaljournalism.bsky.social @compcommlab.bsky.social

Full original thread linked below.
Screenshot of https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2305792 first page.
October 20, 2025 at 1:42 PM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Their means of communication is #Memes and #Trolling. Their main policy goal is #OwningTheLibs. Make no mistake: this – and only this – is why the White House, the Department of Homeland Security, and others have now joined #BlueSky. And all that during a government #Shutdown.
Screenshot showing four official-looking BlueSky accounts for U.S. government agencies. Each has a verified checkmark. HHS (@hhsofficial.bsky.social) – Description: “Official account of U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | hhs.gov.” Homeland Security (@homelandgov.bsky.social) – Description: “With honor and integrity, we will safeguard the American people, our homeland, and our values. #WeAreDHS.” U.S. Department of Labor (@dol.gov) – Description: “The official Bluesky account for the United States Department of Labor.” Followed by: “AMERICAN WORKERS FIRST!” The White House (@whitehouse-47.bsky.social) – Description: “America First.”
October 18, 2025 at 8:39 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Selbstselektion & Mehrfachteilnahme unterminieren Grundlagen seriöser Stichprobenlogik.
Eine nachträgliche Gewichtung kann diese systematischen Verzerrungen nicht kompensieren.
Dass der ORF eine solche Umfrage als inhaltl. Aufhänger nutzt, ist methodisch & journalistisch fragwürdig & enttäuschend.
Screenshot: https://www.orffragt.at/index-ende.php Zur Umfrage Die Online-Umfrage „ORF fragt“ fand von 17. September bis 8. Oktober 2025 statt. Als Teil der ORF-Dialog-Offensive waren alle Menschen in Österreich eingeladen, dabei mitzumachen und ihre Meinungen zu alltagsrelevanten Themen abzugeben. Insgesamt beteiligten sich rund 80.000 Personen – Basis für die Auswertung waren dann 77.684 Interviews mit Personen, die laut eigener Angabe in Österreich wohnen und mindestens 14 Jahre alt sind. Inhaltlich begleitet wurde die Umfrage vom Markt- und Meinungsforschungsinstitut INTEGRAL, das auch die Auswertung durchgeführt hat. Aufgrund der Anlage der Umfrage – jeder, jede Interessierte konnte sich online daran beteiligen – wurde keine Stichprobe nach strengen wissenschaftlichen Kriterien gezogen, weshalb die Ergebnisse nicht repräsentativ für die gesamte österreichische Bevölkerung sind. Die Ergebnisse wurden aber nach soziodemografischen Merkmalen (z. B. Alter, Region) gewichtet, um sie an die tatsächliche Verteilung in der österreichischen Bevölkerung anzupassen.
October 15, 2025 at 7:48 PM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
How much longer until this lemon finally turns yellow? 🍋
It’s been stuck in this green stage since July – any lemon-growing experts out there who can tell me what’s going on?
A potted lemon tree by a window with a large green lemon hanging from a branch. The fruit is still unripe, smooth, and glossy, surrounded by dark green leaves. Through the window, a blurred building can be seen. A label in the pot shows an image of ripe yellow lemons.
October 9, 2025 at 3:56 PM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Für den #MedienInnovationsReport habe ich über unser abgeschlossenes – @analysiseuproject.bsky.social – gesprochen. @c10r4n.bsky.social & ich hatten gemeinsam mit @apa-faktencheck.bsky.social / @flopschmidt.bsky.social einen #FactCheckingKurs entwickelt – Ziel: Demokratisierung des Fact-Checkings.
Schräg fotografiertes Cover des „Medien Innovations Report 2025“ der Mediengruppe Wiener Zeitung. Das Cover ist lila gestaltet mit einem weißen, baumartig verzweigten Muster. Darauf stehen in weißer Schrift der Titel und das Motto: „Forschen. Vernetzen. Erneuern. Die besten Ideen für lebendige Medien.“ Aufgeschlagenes Magazin mit dem Artikel „Prebunking gegen Desinformation“. Links ist der Text zu sehen, rechts ein Foto von drei Männern (das österreichische ANALYSIS-Team) vor einer Leinwand mit dem Logo „analysis“. Der Artikel beschreibt EU-Projekte zu Fact-Checking und Medienkompetenz, unter anderem mit Zitaten von Jakob-Moritz Eberl.
October 6, 2025 at 3:21 PM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Ein Chefredakteur über "Institute für Publizistik" in AT: "ideologische Bedürfnisanstalten, in denen Menschen, die für die Wissenschaft nicht genügend Talent oder Fleiß hatten."

Gleichzeitig: Gleich 3 österreichische Studien unter den „Most recent“ Artikeln in einem der führenden Journals im Fach.
Screenshot der Website des International Journal of Press/Politics (IJPP). Im Abschnitt „Most recent“ sind vier aktuelle Open-Access-Artikel aufgelistet. Drei davon stammen aus Österreich: “Rally and Recalibrate: Political Dynamics of Audience Expectations of Journalism During Times of Crisis” von Claire Roney, Daniel Wiesner, Andreas A. Riedl und Jakob-Moritz Eberl. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612251375203 “Autonomy, Objectivity, and Transparency: The Meaning and Negotiation of Journalistic Values Across Different Journalistic Beats” von Phoebe Mares, Kim Löhmann, Folker Hanusch und Daniel Nölleke. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612251375208 “Dissonant Public Spheres and Facebook Campaigning in Austria: A Cross-Level Study of the 2024 European and National Parliament Elections” von Franz Reiter und Uta Rußmann. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612251370104 Das Bild hebt diese drei Publikationen visuell mit roten Rahmen hervor.
October 6, 2025 at 2:01 PM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
I’m really happy to see this published – it builds on two earlier collaborations between @andreasriedl.bsky.social and me. Huge thanks to @clmron.bsky.social and @danielwiesner.bsky.social for taking the lead on this one! 12/end
Screenshot of an academic article titled “Audience expectations of journalism: What’s politics got to do with it?” published in the journal Journalism (Volume 23, Issue 8, August 2022, pages 1682–1699, SAGE Journals). Authors: Andreas Riedl and Jakob-Moritz Eberl. The abstract explains that the study investigates what audiences expect from journalism and how political attitudes influence those expectations. Using online survey data from both audiences (n = 2,775) and journalists (n = 818) in Austria, the study compares audience expectations with journalists’ own role conceptions. It applies multivariate analyses to explore the influence of media use and political orientations. Findings reveal both similarities and discrepancies between citizens’ and journalists’ perceptions of journalism’s functions, highlighting that political attitudes, alongside media use, significantly shape audience expectations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920976422 Screenshot of a University of Vienna webpage titled “Audience Expectations of Coronavirus Reporting: From Watchdog to Lapdog?” published on May 18, 2020, as part of the Corona-Blog of the Vienna Center for Electoral Research (VieCER). The text summarizes findings from a study by Jakob-Moritz Eberl, Andreas Riedl, and Noelle S. Lebernegg based on the Austrian Corona Panel Project. Key results are highlighted in blue boxes: – Audience expectations of coronavirus reporting are generally high, with over 60% rating all nine journalistic roles as “very” or “extremely important.” – The Fact Checker role is valued the most (82% of respondents). – The Watchdog role—focused on critique and control—is considered the least important. – Perceptions of journalism depend strongly on satisfaction with the federal government: dissatisfied respondents prioritize the Watchdog role, while satisfied ones favor the Collaborator role that supports government measures. The accompanying text discusses journalism’s democratic functions, referencing the watchdog role and how citizens’ trust in government affects their expectations of journalistic reporting. The right sidebar lists sections for the Austrian Corona Panel Project, including “Overview by topic,” “Dashboard,” and “Austrian National Election Study (AUTNES).” Contact information and a note about the Corona-Blog’s focus on panel survey results related to the COVID-19 crisis appear below.
October 6, 2025 at 8:36 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Scope & limits ⚖️: Austria 🇦🇹 case; single-item role measures; #expectations (not #performance). Still, the crisis pattern – rally 🤝, recalibrate 🔄, reassert oversight 👀 – likely travels 🌍. Comparative work needed.
📊Data: Austrian Corona Panel Project via @aussda.bsky.social 10/n.
Screenshot of the Austrian Corona Panel Project (SUF edition), Version 7.0 dataset entry on the AUSSDA data repository. The dataset is authored by Bernhard Kittel, Sylvia Kritzinger, Hajo Boomgaarden, Barbara Prainsack, Jakob-Moritz Eberl, and others. Description notes that the project monitors health, economic, and social aspects of the COVID-19 crisis in Austria through repeated surveys. Keywords include economic activity, public health, trust in government, mass media use, COVID-19, vaccination, and European integration. Related publication: Kittel et al. (2021), European Political Science. Notes detail dataset versions, with Version 7 (published June 18, 2025) including waves 1 to 35 (German and English). The right side shows options to access or share the dataset and states 6,954 downloads. Data paper: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00294-7 Dataset: https://doi.org/10.11587/28KQNS
October 6, 2025 at 8:36 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Now dynamic models 🔄 :
👀Watchdog rises ⬆️ via two paths – more quality-news use 📰 & trust in science 🔬, but also w/ declining trust in gov ⬇️.
🏛️Collaborator falls ⬇️ w/ lower trust in gov, weaker support for measures 🚫, & lower perceived risk ⚠️.
📉📈 "V-shaped" roles track shifts in personal risk 🫀. 8/n
Figure 3 titled “Dynamic model of predictors of audience expectations toward journalists in times of crises (OLS).” The figure shows nine coefficient plots arranged in a 3×3 grid for different journalistic roles: Informer, Analyst, Mobilizer, Missionary, Watchdog, Collaborator, Entertainer, Science Communicator, and Fact Checker. Each plot displays standardized OLS regression coefficients (x-axis labeled from –0.2 to +0.2) with confidence intervals, examining how changes in various predictors correspond to changes in audience expectations for each role. Predictors listed on the y-axis include Age, Education, Gender (Male), Quality News Use, Commercial News Use, Social Media News Use, Trust in Public Broadcaster, Ideology (Right), Extremism, Trust in Government, Trust in Science, Government Measures, Conspiracy Beliefs, and Risk Perception. Colored points and lines represent roles (red = Informer, orange = Analyst, green = Missionary/Mobilizer, turquoise = Watchdog/Collaborator, blue = Entertainer, pink = Science Communicator/Fact Checker). A vertical dashed line marks zero; coefficients significant at p < 0.05 are marked with asterisks. Caption notes: the model tests dynamic relationships using 1,286 observations and 833 respondent clusters, with low multicollinearity (VIF M = 1.09, SD = 0.10). Source: https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612251375203 Zoomed in on the graph for better readability.
October 6, 2025 at 8:36 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Now to the static predictors 🧩 – much to unpack here:
For example, 📰 Quality-news use → higher for 👀Watchdog, 🔬Science Communicator, ✅Fact Checker
📺Commercial-news use → 🎭Entertainer
🔬Trust in science → higher across nearly all roles⬆️
➡️Right-leaning ideology → lowers several expectations⬇ 7/n
Figure 2 titled “Static model of predictors of audience expectations toward journalists in times of crises (OLS).” The figure consists of nine coefficient plots arranged in a 3×3 grid, one for each journalistic role: Informer, Analyst, Mobilizer, Missionary, Watchdog, Collaborator, Entertainer, Science Communicator, and Fact Checker. Each plot shows standardized OLS regression coefficients (x-axis labeled from –0.2 to +0.2) with confidence intervals for predictors listed on the y-axis: Age, Education, Gender (Male), Quality News Use, Commercial News Use, Social Media News Use, Trust Public Broadcaster, Ideology (Right), Extremism, Trust Government, Trust Science, Government Measures, Conspiracy Beliefs, and Risk Perception. Colored points and lines represent coefficients (red for Informer, yellow for Analyst, olive for Mobilizer, green for Missionary, turquoise for Watchdog, blue for Collaborator and Entertainer, pink for Science Communicator and Fact Checker). A vertical dashed line marks zero. Several predictors show statistically significant effects (indicated by asterisks). Caption notes: OLS regressions with clustered standard errors (n = 3,057, 1,685 clusters). Wave fixed effects are included; coefficients significant at p < 0.05 are marked with *. Source: https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612251375203 Zoomed in on the actual graph for better readability.
October 6, 2025 at 8:36 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Result #1 📢: Audience expectations are volatile & context-dependent. Several roles show a clear “v-shape”📉📈 over time, peaking in acute phases of the pandemic.
📊Informer steadily declines⬇️
👀Watchdog increases⬆️
🏛️Collaborator drops⬇️
🔬Science Communicator & ✅Fact Checker find the highest support 3/n
Stacked area chart titled “Overview of Journalistic Roles and their Perceived Importance Over Time.” The x-axis lists nine journalistic roles — Informer, Analyst, Mobilizer, Missionary, Watchdog, Collaborator, Entertainer, Science Communicator, and Fact Checker. Each column shows data for three time points (April 2020, June 2020, January 2021) from the Austrian Corona Panel Project. The y-axis ranges from 0 to 100, representing the percentage of respondents rating each role’s importance. Shades of purple indicate five importance levels: Unimportant (lightest) to Extremely Important (darkest). Figure note: The figure shows the distribution of audience-rated importance for each of the nine journalistic roles across three survey waves (April 2020, June 2020, and January 2021). Importance was rated on a five-point scale from “unimportant” to “extremely important.” The number of respondents per wave was n = 1,500, 1,510, and 1,612, respectively. Population weights applied. Source: https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612251375203
October 6, 2025 at 8:36 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Design in brief 📝: We draw on the #ACPP (n≈1,500/wave; Apr 20, Jun 20, Jan 21).
Respondents rated how important they found 9 journalistic roles during the pandemic: 📊 Informer, 🧐Analyst, 📢 Mobilizer, 🤝 Missionary, 👀 Watchdog, 🏛️Collaborator, 🎭 Entertainer, 🔬 Science Communicator, & ✅ Fact Checker 2/n
Table titled “Overview of Journalistic Roles and Role Wordings.” It lists nine journalistic roles with their corresponding item wordings: – Informer: Announce the number of people testing positive for COVID-19 and related deaths. – Analyst: Contextualize projections about the virus’s spread and its economic impact in Austria. – Mobilizer: Motivate people to assist those particularly affected. – Missionary: Contribute to strengthening social cohesion. – Watchdog: Critically evaluate the government’s crisis management. – Collaborator: Support government measures to contain the virus. – Entertainer: Provide entertainment and relaxation to help cope with isolation. – Science Communicator: Provide a platform for science and research. – Fact Checker: Debunk so-called “fake news” about the coronavirus. Table can be found in: https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612251375203 Screenshot of the Austrian Corona Panel Project (SUF edition), Version 7.0 dataset entry on the AUSSDA data repository. The dataset is authored by Bernhard Kittel, Sylvia Kritzinger, Hajo Boomgaarden, Barbara Prainsack, Jakob-Moritz Eberl, and others. Description notes that the project monitors health, economic, and social aspects of the COVID-19 crisis in Austria through repeated surveys. Keywords include economic activity, public health, trust in government, mass media use, COVID-19, vaccination, and European integration. Related publication: Kittel et al. (2021), European Political Science. Notes detail dataset versions, with Version 7 (published June 18, 2025) including waves 1 to 35 (German and English). The right side shows options to access or share the dataset and states 6,954 downloads. Data paper here: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00294-7 Dataset here: https://doi.org/10.11587/28KQNS
October 6, 2025 at 8:36 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
New publication out in #IJPP! 📑
We study how audience expectations of journalism 📰 shifted during COVID-19 in Austria 🇦🇹 – showing both short-term rally effects & longer-term recalibration 🔄.
Led by @clmron.bsky.social & @danielwiesner.bsky.social , w/ @andreasriedl.bsky.social & me. 1/n
Screenshot of an academic article titled “Rally and Recalibrate: Political Dynamics of Audience Expectations of Journalism During Times of Crisis” published in The International Journal of Press/Politics (OnlineFirst, Sage Journals). Authors: Claire Roney, Daniel Wiesner, Andreas A. Riedl, and Jakob-Moritz Eberl. The abstract explains that the study examines how audience expectations of journalism in Austria evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic. It identifies shifts toward emerging journalistic roles such as Fact Checker and Science Communicator, based on data from three waves of the Austrian Corona Panel Project. Findings show fluctuating audience expectations tied to changes in public trust and crisis dynamics, emphasizing journalism’s need for adaptability. Keywords listed: journalism, audience expectations, trust in institutions, crisis attitudes, survey research, COVID-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612251375203
October 6, 2025 at 8:36 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
This week, I joined the #PolishCommunicationAssociation in #Katowice 🇵🇱.
I presented @medem.bsky.social – where we stand as #EuropeanResearchInfrastructure ⚙️ & what lies ahead.
Many thanks to the MEDem teams at #UniversityOfSilesia, #JagiellonianUniversity, & #UniwersytetSWPS for the warm welcome.
Wide view of Jakob-Moritz Eberl presenting on stage at the Congress of the Polish Communication Association in Katowice. A large projected slide titled “Why research infrastructures?” is visible, listing features such as data provision, method development, networking, and training. Jakob-Moritz Eberl standing at a black lectern, giving a presentation at the Congress of the Polish Communication Association in Katowice. Behind him a slide about MEDem services is projected, including text on harmonization and linking services.
September 26, 2025 at 9:54 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Am Samstag stand eine Diskussion zu „Fake News“ auf dem Programm. Mein wichtigster Punkt:
Größte Gefahr von #Desinformation geht nicht von anonymen Webseiten oder „Trollen“ aus. Viel problematischer ist #Desinfo von "oben" – von Politiker:innen & Parteien, die demokratische Spielregeln missachten.
Diskussionsrunde zu „Fake News 2.0“ im Saal, moderiert von Verena Latzer. Auf dem Podium sitzen von links nach rechts Margit Draxl, Jakob-Moritz Eberl, Viktoria Klimpfinger und Marcus Franz. Im Hintergrund ein Bildschirm mit dem Veranstaltungstitel und den Portraits der Diskutant:innen, rechts ein Falter-Banner. (Foto Credits: Karin Gruber) Nahaufnahme aus der Diskussion „Fake News 2.0“: Jakob-Moritz Eberl spricht, neben ihm links im Bild Margit Draxl und rechts teilweise sichtbar Verena Latzer und Marcus Franz. (Foto Credits: Karin Gruber)
September 26, 2025 at 7:40 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
And in other posts NYT is just repeating conspiracy myths. This Is Not Journalism.
Screenshot of a Facebook post mentioning a conspiracy myth that the UN escalator stopped when Trump stepped on because of deliberate sabotage by a UN staff member.
September 24, 2025 at 4:05 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
„Trump delivered impassioned – if scientifically dubious – remarks about the rise in autism“ — really? That’s what you went with @nytimes.com? Come on… 🫥
Screenshot of a FB post of the NYTimes account. including the words quoted in the main post…
September 23, 2025 at 9:37 AM
jamoeberl.bsky.social
Sometimes #ART just speaks to me. #PatriciaShrigley at the #MuzeumSlaskie in #Katowice.

1/2 📸 (c) @claesdevreese.bsky.social
Me taking a picture of the painting „Breeding Pigeon“ by Patricia Shrigley. Painting „Breeding Pigeon“ by Patricia Shrigley. It’s a pigeon looking directly at you.
September 22, 2025 at 4:35 PM