@iwasbeingsarcastic.bsky.social
Human rights don't exist. You have to describe them into existence. You didn't answer any of my questions because you didnt know them. If you answered the questions, you'd logically discover the ontological status of God and rights are the same thing, from the athiestic paradigm.
November 9, 2025 at 12:58 PM
Human rights don't exist. You have to describe them into existence. You didn't answer any of my questions because you didnt know them. If you answered the questions, you'd logically discover the ontological status of God and rights are the same thing, from the athiestic paradigm.
You can take the ape out of the jungle but you can't take the jungle out of the ape. I love climbing too.
November 7, 2025 at 4:06 PM
You can take the ape out of the jungle but you can't take the jungle out of the ape. I love climbing too.
*Insignificant
November 7, 2025 at 4:02 PM
*Insignificant
It's not significant enough to use as a premise for any conclusion other than how significant it is.
November 7, 2025 at 4:02 PM
It's not significant enough to use as a premise for any conclusion other than how significant it is.
God is just as real as human rights. What gives either of them any justification to exist, what is their ontology?
November 7, 2025 at 3:58 PM
God is just as real as human rights. What gives either of them any justification to exist, what is their ontology?
Can you list the person's who should?
September 26, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Can you list the person's who should?
You know who the shooter is, the violent one expressing anger?
September 11, 2025 at 1:13 AM
You know who the shooter is, the violent one expressing anger?
Cows eat grass.
August 2, 2025 at 11:48 PM
Cows eat grass.
Well, not exactly, there would just be whatever laws replace the constitution. Some people follow the law, and others want to conserve older law, but there will still be the current laws.
July 12, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Well, not exactly, there would just be whatever laws replace the constitution. Some people follow the law, and others want to conserve older law, but there will still be the current laws.
if they suspend the constitution then you should arm yourself, unless there are laws against guns.
July 12, 2025 at 11:22 AM
if they suspend the constitution then you should arm yourself, unless there are laws against guns.
So you don't make good decisions on behalf of others. It's good to know people can count on you to stay away from deciding what's just.
May 13, 2025 at 9:35 AM
So you don't make good decisions on behalf of others. It's good to know people can count on you to stay away from deciding what's just.
If you refuse jury duty, then the other people decide the fate of people. Good thing it wasn't you deciding.
May 13, 2025 at 9:05 AM
If you refuse jury duty, then the other people decide the fate of people. Good thing it wasn't you deciding.
Do we know the gender of those balls?
April 26, 2025 at 9:58 PM
Do we know the gender of those balls?
Did it just eat a toaster?
April 26, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Did it just eat a toaster?
This is basically the same measure of who does the homicides. It makes sense since most homicides are within the same race, interracial homicides are in the minority.
April 20, 2025 at 10:17 AM
This is basically the same measure of who does the homicides. It makes sense since most homicides are within the same race, interracial homicides are in the minority.
Yes, "they" contradict themselves in perpetuity, pretending to tell the truth to those that are looking for it. I'm not interested in being in suspense, so I shall ignore you, until you address your contradictions.
April 10, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Yes, "they" contradict themselves in perpetuity, pretending to tell the truth to those that are looking for it. I'm not interested in being in suspense, so I shall ignore you, until you address your contradictions.
So you were wrong about me being sarcastic?
April 9, 2025 at 7:27 PM
So you were wrong about me being sarcastic?
Sarcasm isn't required to be clever. When did you make that point, and when did I miss it?
April 9, 2025 at 6:00 PM
Sarcasm isn't required to be clever. When did you make that point, and when did I miss it?
Only a king and an authoritarian can make people do things for the good. A democracy with civil rights dictate you can do anything that feels good. Who wants a king telling people to behave, don't you want more civil rights/amendments from the voters to grant you less duty, and more freedom?
April 9, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Only a king and an authoritarian can make people do things for the good. A democracy with civil rights dictate you can do anything that feels good. Who wants a king telling people to behave, don't you want more civil rights/amendments from the voters to grant you less duty, and more freedom?
Nobody is required to step up because that's how democracy and civil rights function. We don't have civil duites, we have civil rights. Democracies don't vote for duties, they vote for rights to more things. There is no law requiring anyone to protect anyone from anything, because it was voted for.
April 9, 2025 at 5:09 PM
Nobody is required to step up because that's how democracy and civil rights function. We don't have civil duites, we have civil rights. Democracies don't vote for duties, they vote for rights to more things. There is no law requiring anyone to protect anyone from anything, because it was voted for.
Democracy allows you to vote for people that won't hold up the values. See how you missed that?
April 9, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Democracy allows you to vote for people that won't hold up the values. See how you missed that?
If you don't need to limit voting, then you want people to be able to vote for a guy willing to break laws? Democracies don't limit people from voting for criminals. If criminals can vote, they won't vote for law enforcement. There is no limit to the bad outcomes if you don't limit who can vote.
April 9, 2025 at 5:06 PM
If you don't need to limit voting, then you want people to be able to vote for a guy willing to break laws? Democracies don't limit people from voting for criminals. If criminals can vote, they won't vote for law enforcement. There is no limit to the bad outcomes if you don't limit who can vote.
Wait, so people can just break laws and nobody will stop them unless they have the power to do it? No way, maybe you can make laws against that.
April 9, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Wait, so people can just break laws and nobody will stop them unless they have the power to do it? No way, maybe you can make laws against that.
Would Hitler exist if you only allowed Jews to vote? Of course not, you have to limit people's voting rights if you want to limit what people can vote for. So go out and rally the troops to make a system that suppresses the vote of bad people and you'll become the hero.
April 9, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Would Hitler exist if you only allowed Jews to vote? Of course not, you have to limit people's voting rights if you want to limit what people can vote for. So go out and rally the troops to make a system that suppresses the vote of bad people and you'll become the hero.
It's pro democratic because they need democracy to be voted for. When they stop allowing you to vote then it will be anti democratic. Wake me up when you can't vote anymore. You'll always be able to, so what's your problem? Fear you won't be able to?
April 9, 2025 at 4:35 PM
It's pro democratic because they need democracy to be voted for. When they stop allowing you to vote then it will be anti democratic. Wake me up when you can't vote anymore. You'll always be able to, so what's your problem? Fear you won't be able to?