I'm not sure how your Lilith worshipping jives with letting Clint Howard rape ppl.

But the lady vomiting up a giant cockroach, the size of an arm was pretty gnarly.

"with an attitude like that, you're gonna lose your job"

"Oh yeah? Well fuck my attitude! Fuck the job! And FUCK YOU!"

Good for you lady.

As to my original point on Ketan's post. We are rapidly passing the point of minor reconciliatory actions, ppl have given up on conventional political avenues of change and are coming to reorganize the system through radical, direct, collective actions.

With state governments, trying to crack down on moderate forms of climate actions, such as civil disobedience. In the form of anti-protest laws. It is only likely to increase these feelings of procedural injustice, lack of group efficacy and contempt. Fuelling ever more radical, climate actions.

It's the same up in the north end of Australia. Just brutal humidity where you covered in a continuous coat of sweat.

conventional means as a route of causing effective change. With anger giving way to contempt and fuelling the radical strains of collective, climate action over the past decade. With numerous, more radical groups, emerging from the wider environmental movement.

direct actions aimed at dismantling the system are the only way forward, regardless of their legality or social normality.

"Politics has failed, the machine won't budge without material resistance" - Jonah (member of Blockade Australia)

As such, we can clearly see that ppl have given up on

"As a young person who feels quite disempowered within the political system"... "I feel like I've exhausted every other avenue"

Members of such groups often voicing the opinion that, the state has been captured by the fossil fuel industries. Leading to the opinion that collective, organized,

radical, climate action groups and statements made by climate activists like Matilda Lane-Rose (member of Disrupt Burrup Hub), who, when asked about her intentions to engage in illegal climate actions, prior to her arrest for attempting to paint-bomb Meg O'Neill's house said

This lack of group efficacy stemming from a sense of procedural injustice, with government seen to be instituting policies favourable to fossil fuel companies, which are unrepresentative of the population's will. Due to conflicts of interest, bias and corruption.

Can be seen all over media from

Likewise, where group efficacy is a pathway to normative, collective actions. It is lack of group efficacy and belief that the group is incapable of making meaningful change through conventional means, which predicts participation in more radical forms of collective action.

A thought process clearly seen in comments by radical, climate action groups such as Blockade Australia.

of anger that have gone unresolved. Thus, no longer seeking reconciliatory actions and undermining the need to act within legal frameworks and social norms, when dealing with perpetrators of injustice because current systems are seen as illegitimate and in need of radical reorganization.

or contravene social norms (Tausch et al 2011).

The difference between these 2 affective states is, anger seeks to get perpetrators of injustice to modify their behaviour, in situations where there is a perceived ability to change the perpetrator's actions.Contempt arises out of previous instances

For affective injustice, emotions such as anger and contempt are the strongest predictors. Anger for normative, collective actions such as protests, voting intentions, petitions (Tausch et al 2011)

And contempt for radical forms of collective actions i.e those that are illegal, destructive/violent