I am so baffled by the claim that the US is going to run the country when the vice president is still there and has already been sworn in as president.

There’s a fair chance JD would go along with the lawless handing out of pardons.

It really seems like some staffer in a meeting was just like “Wouldn’t it be such poetic justice to make Merrick Garland AG since the GOP denied him a Supreme Court seat?” And everyone was just like “OMG YEAH!” And they never took the time to actually consider if he was the best person for the job.

The French Socialist Party? They banned the death penalty in the 80s, for example.

I’m very curious to know from legal experts what might be the justification for these redactions. Could they be legit or are they likely illegal under the Epstein files release law?

Yet another reason why no university should cave to the Trump admin: there is ample evidence that the “fighting antisemitism” claims are a false pretext. The admin regularly embraces antisemites, including for high ranking positions in the government.

You can measure the quality of news outlets' political coverage by how often they write headlines starting with the words "Trump says" that don't show any skepticism about what Trump is saying even though he's the most prominent American liar of modern times.

I thought they already passed some sort of expansion of association health plans? And is there any proof that association health plans would offer lower premiums/costs in general vs. marketplace plans?

Let’s be clear though: even more than the wannabe dictator, they were catering to a small club of racist wealthy investors. As soon as the rich white dudes applied a little bit of pressure, Target caved on virtually all of its DEI promises and initiatives.

How are they not utterly embarrassed to have invited Eric Adams?