Insert Spooky Name Here
banner
insertspookyname.bsky.social
Insert Spooky Name Here
@insertspookyname.bsky.social
Cis. He/him.
Quit then, loser
November 27, 2025 at 4:56 AM
Fuck off.

And buettner can fuck off along with you.
November 26, 2025 at 1:12 AM
THANK YOU! We've allowed that bullshit to be normalized for way too long.
November 26, 2025 at 1:12 AM
Yeah. I think it falls under the umbrella of uncanny valley. Even if it's something not specifically human I think our brains react differently if we get a sense of slight lack of realism.
November 25, 2025 at 5:01 PM
Legit gonna buy these for my partner for Christmas. Will try to remember to report back about whether their vajankle-ness carries over in person.
November 25, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Not just OK, but essential.
November 25, 2025 at 4:17 PM
I think there being a human on screen grounds the fx in a pleasing way, and RDJ was really good at the physicality of suiting up.
November 25, 2025 at 4:03 PM
November 25, 2025 at 3:39 AM
It was also like the 6th time it was adapted to film or something like that. I think about that every time people complain about a new adaptation of something.
November 25, 2025 at 2:38 AM
The real question is how did that person look buried under a flower bed after they said that???
November 25, 2025 at 2:14 AM
(ugh... The typos. The typos)
November 24, 2025 at 10:36 PM
In your mind, yep. I'm going to block you now.
November 24, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Then copy/paste it
November 24, 2025 at 7:26 PM
I'm seriously stuck in that metaphor about playing chess with a pigeon.

I didn't say what you just said I did at any point in this conversation. Your psyche is clearly just so fucking demented that you've repeatedly added like 27 layers of screwed up implication to everything I've said.

Seek help
November 24, 2025 at 7:23 PM
Oh? Is it? Quote me, genius.
November 24, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Yep. I'm the lunatic here even though I never said that & you literally built a bunch of it in your own mind. K lol
November 24, 2025 at 6:49 PM
😂
I haven't done that anywhere here. I'm talking about violence that many think is A OK vs violence that is "wild" for people to consider might be OK. And you're sitting there incapable of having a basic discussion either because your reading comprehension sucks or because you're morally inept
November 24, 2025 at 6:41 PM
Oh? You're not getting bent out of shape? You really just think "legal=moral"? K
November 24, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Like... Do I need to pull out the old "slavery was once legal" yarn?
November 24, 2025 at 6:23 PM
Yes. Still just a group of people. Still a bunch of "laws" that a bunch of the governments involved in coming up with don't even follow. Still a bunch of militaries that, by & large, just function to procure resources. Why are you getting so stuck on this?
November 24, 2025 at 6:23 PM
Nope
And I'm not sure why you're getting pissy either. I wasn't over here thinking this was an argument.
November 24, 2025 at 6:19 PM
And here you are thinking that government writing laws (that they the don't even follow) is the be all and end all. 🤷‍♂️
November 24, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Did I say otherwise?
November 24, 2025 at 6:16 PM
Nothing I've posted is gibberish. So, I think there's another reason you're not engaging.
November 24, 2025 at 6:12 PM
So, given that, the response to Luigi makes sense, & is worthy of moral consideration. That's all.
November 24, 2025 at 6:10 PM