impastau~
@impastau.bsky.social
28. just a lil lesbian who loves sapphic media💖 || 21⬆️ otherwise DNI🔞
either ✨professionally lurking✨ or ✨incessantly yappin✨
either ✨professionally lurking✨ or ✨incessantly yappin✨
Reposted by impastau~
January 22, 2026 at 12:36 PM
Reposted by impastau~
Reposted by impastau~
Valentino: I’m actually really smart in Spanish.
Velvette: I don’t believe you.
Val: Learn Spanish then, bitch.
.
.
.
Vel, 100,000 Vuolingo lessons later, bursting into Vox’s office: Holy shit, he’s even dumber in Spanish!
Vox: No fucking way!
#Vees
Velvette: I don’t believe you.
Val: Learn Spanish then, bitch.
.
.
.
Vel, 100,000 Vuolingo lessons later, bursting into Vox’s office: Holy shit, he’s even dumber in Spanish!
Vox: No fucking way!
#Vees
January 22, 2026 at 4:27 AM
Valentino: I’m actually really smart in Spanish.
Velvette: I don’t believe you.
Val: Learn Spanish then, bitch.
.
.
.
Vel, 100,000 Vuolingo lessons later, bursting into Vox’s office: Holy shit, he’s even dumber in Spanish!
Vox: No fucking way!
#Vees
Velvette: I don’t believe you.
Val: Learn Spanish then, bitch.
.
.
.
Vel, 100,000 Vuolingo lessons later, bursting into Vox’s office: Holy shit, he’s even dumber in Spanish!
Vox: No fucking way!
#Vees
Reposted by impastau~
Another Kofi req donee for these two AAAAA!! This abt to be "heavenly~" .. No? Just me .. ok 🥹
--
👼❌📱
#HazbinHotel #hazbinhotelVelvette #hazbinhotelEmily #fashionhalo #velvettedove #velvettexemily
--
👼❌📱
#HazbinHotel #hazbinhotelVelvette #hazbinhotelEmily #fashionhalo #velvettedove #velvettexemily
August 12, 2025 at 5:45 PM
Another Kofi req donee for these two AAAAA!! This abt to be "heavenly~" .. No? Just me .. ok 🥹
--
👼❌📱
#HazbinHotel #hazbinhotelVelvette #hazbinhotelEmily #fashionhalo #velvettedove #velvettexemily
--
👼❌📱
#HazbinHotel #hazbinhotelVelvette #hazbinhotelEmily #fashionhalo #velvettedove #velvettexemily
Reposted by impastau~
January 2, 2026 at 1:18 AM
Reposted by impastau~
Manifesting an extremely horny and sexually charged #dangervag confrontation in s2
I had fun shading this one
I had fun shading this one
October 17, 2025 at 8:25 AM
Manifesting an extremely horny and sexually charged #dangervag confrontation in s2
I had fun shading this one
I had fun shading this one
Reposted by impastau~
(16/18) Consider a trope you want to explore and see what WLW relationship (canon, non-canon, OCxcanon, any!) you could use for that exploration.
Now one might say “But VelvettesHairSwirl, none of the women interest me! They’re all so boring!” And I’d say, mentally genderbend the women -
Now one might say “But VelvettesHairSwirl, none of the women interest me! They’re all so boring!” And I’d say, mentally genderbend the women -
January 20, 2026 at 5:40 PM
(16/18) Consider a trope you want to explore and see what WLW relationship (canon, non-canon, OCxcanon, any!) you could use for that exploration.
Now one might say “But VelvettesHairSwirl, none of the women interest me! They’re all so boring!” And I’d say, mentally genderbend the women -
Now one might say “But VelvettesHairSwirl, none of the women interest me! They’re all so boring!” And I’d say, mentally genderbend the women -
Reposted by impastau~
(15/18) Three: We’ve got to intentionally include WLW couples. It can be very easy to fall into working with the “default” or what’s most popular and realize you have a collection of fanworks full of only MLM or men-focused content.
January 20, 2026 at 5:40 PM
(15/18) Three: We’ve got to intentionally include WLW couples. It can be very easy to fall into working with the “default” or what’s most popular and realize you have a collection of fanworks full of only MLM or men-focused content.
Reposted by impastau~
(14/18) Two: We’ve got to start playing with women’s gender expression more. We genderbend the men all day, back and forth. We need more of this with the ladies, piling on masculine traits and transforming them outside of the constraints of femininity. More nonbinary and trans headcanons for women!
January 20, 2026 at 5:40 PM
(14/18) Two: We’ve got to start playing with women’s gender expression more. We genderbend the men all day, back and forth. We need more of this with the ladies, piling on masculine traits and transforming them outside of the constraints of femininity. More nonbinary and trans headcanons for women!
Reposted by impastau~
(13/18) Here’s the harder part: sometimes we have to let others dislike them for these things. Saying someone is misogynistic for disliking specific traits in a woman that we would allow them to dislike in men reinforces the idea that a female character represents all women vs. her own individual.
January 20, 2026 at 5:40 PM
(13/18) Here’s the harder part: sometimes we have to let others dislike them for these things. Saying someone is misogynistic for disliking specific traits in a woman that we would allow them to dislike in men reinforces the idea that a female character represents all women vs. her own individual.
Reposted by impastau~
(12/18) One: We’ve got to stop policing women characters so hard. Let them be evil, let them be sexy, let them be childish, let them make mistakes, let them be scared, perverted, cruel, the whole range we allow for the men. Let them be full characters!
January 20, 2026 at 5:40 PM
(12/18) One: We’ve got to stop policing women characters so hard. Let them be evil, let them be sexy, let them be childish, let them make mistakes, let them be scared, perverted, cruel, the whole range we allow for the men. Let them be full characters!
Reposted by impastau~
(9/18) I think this is also why people call Chaggie boring in comparison to other healthy Hellaverse couples containing men.
M&M and Fizzmodeus have a lot more room for playing with gender and sexuality without becoming (controversial) commentary on their genders or on sex themselves.
M&M and Fizzmodeus have a lot more room for playing with gender and sexuality without becoming (controversial) commentary on their genders or on sex themselves.
January 20, 2026 at 5:40 PM
(9/18) I think this is also why people call Chaggie boring in comparison to other healthy Hellaverse couples containing men.
M&M and Fizzmodeus have a lot more room for playing with gender and sexuality without becoming (controversial) commentary on their genders or on sex themselves.
M&M and Fizzmodeus have a lot more room for playing with gender and sexuality without becoming (controversial) commentary on their genders or on sex themselves.
Reposted by impastau~
(8/18) The women are always commentary on misogyny, infantilization, lesbianism, motherhood, etc. The men get to be full people outside of their gender, women always have to work in the constraints of their gender.
January 20, 2026 at 5:40 PM
(8/18) The women are always commentary on misogyny, infantilization, lesbianism, motherhood, etc. The men get to be full people outside of their gender, women always have to work in the constraints of their gender.
Reposted by impastau~
(4/18) Also, since women characters are always women, there's more politics and policing around these characters.
Your Alastor, Lucifer, Vox dolls can play into any trope or idea you’re interested in exploring, but Charlie, Niffty, Velvette, Lilith dolls become inherent commentary on womanhood.
Your Alastor, Lucifer, Vox dolls can play into any trope or idea you’re interested in exploring, but Charlie, Niffty, Velvette, Lilith dolls become inherent commentary on womanhood.
January 20, 2026 at 5:40 PM
(4/18) Also, since women characters are always women, there's more politics and policing around these characters.
Your Alastor, Lucifer, Vox dolls can play into any trope or idea you’re interested in exploring, but Charlie, Niffty, Velvette, Lilith dolls become inherent commentary on womanhood.
Your Alastor, Lucifer, Vox dolls can play into any trope or idea you’re interested in exploring, but Charlie, Niffty, Velvette, Lilith dolls become inherent commentary on womanhood.
An absolutely fantastic and IMPORTANT (!!!!) thread. Please read what @velvetteshairswirl.bsky.social had to say her. Fuckin’ COOKED then ate it up
(1/18) I love this topic & thread! MLM is generally more popular than WLW even among queer & sapphic people and I think it’s in part because the societal centering of men has turned men into the default in a genderless way. This video has a fashion perspective, but it’s the same concept
January 20, 2026 at 10:10 PM
An absolutely fantastic and IMPORTANT (!!!!) thread. Please read what @velvetteshairswirl.bsky.social had to say her. Fuckin’ COOKED then ate it up
Reposted by impastau~
I’ve always fallen back on this article as a good discussion on the topic. it posits that toxic masculinity punishing open displays of affection, platonic or otherwise, between men
while the patriarchy normalised kissing etc. as something platonic between women
thedailyfandom.org/wlw-content-...
while the patriarchy normalised kissing etc. as something platonic between women
thedailyfandom.org/wlw-content-...
Why Is WLW Content Less Popular Than MLM? • The Daily Fandom
It seems in mainstream media, there is more MLM content--and MLM content is valued more--than WLW content. Why is that?
thedailyfandom.org
January 20, 2026 at 10:03 AM
I’ve always fallen back on this article as a good discussion on the topic. it posits that toxic masculinity punishing open displays of affection, platonic or otherwise, between men
while the patriarchy normalised kissing etc. as something platonic between women
thedailyfandom.org/wlw-content-...
while the patriarchy normalised kissing etc. as something platonic between women
thedailyfandom.org/wlw-content-...
Reposted by impastau~
This hits the nail on the head!!
I’d like to add, the article talks about this from a specifically Western perspective, recounting a historical narrative that posits the 19th century as its starting point. But there’s a deeply important history before then: skemman.is/bitstream/19...
I’d like to add, the article talks about this from a specifically Western perspective, recounting a historical narrative that posits the 19th century as its starting point. But there’s a deeply important history before then: skemman.is/bitstream/19...
skemman.is
January 20, 2026 at 10:34 AM
This hits the nail on the head!!
I’d like to add, the article talks about this from a specifically Western perspective, recounting a historical narrative that posits the 19th century as its starting point. But there’s a deeply important history before then: skemman.is/bitstream/19...
I’d like to add, the article talks about this from a specifically Western perspective, recounting a historical narrative that posits the 19th century as its starting point. But there’s a deeply important history before then: skemman.is/bitstream/19...
Reposted by impastau~
Just as a side note, when I say excluding, I mean as in, making a definition which doesn’t *require* them. If someone actively desires a relationship with them that should of COURSE be totally valid! As long as it comes from a place of ~active, autonomous, enthusiastic sexual subjectivity.
January 20, 2026 at 11:13 AM
Just as a side note, when I say excluding, I mean as in, making a definition which doesn’t *require* them. If someone actively desires a relationship with them that should of COURSE be totally valid! As long as it comes from a place of ~active, autonomous, enthusiastic sexual subjectivity.
Reposted by impastau~
We should say FUCK IT, and fight for our independence and our natural right to be active sexual subjects, excluding men from our conceptions of sex and sexuality, and boldly proclaiming what is self-evidently true.
January 20, 2026 at 11:05 AM
We should say FUCK IT, and fight for our independence and our natural right to be active sexual subjects, excluding men from our conceptions of sex and sexuality, and boldly proclaiming what is self-evidently true.
This tbh. I think it in part has to do with a cultural desire to see men not be incredibly, homophobically toxic towards each other. Primarily though, I do think it comes from an inability folks have to decenter men from their lives. To imagine relationships that don’t include them.
i’m down to talk about the sociocultural factors that make ppl so attuned to the slightest chemistry between male characters while sapphic fictional couples have to basically eat each other’s faces and scissor to get recognised (and then walk a tightrope to not get called ”fetishising”
January 20, 2026 at 9:52 AM
This tbh. I think it in part has to do with a cultural desire to see men not be incredibly, homophobically toxic towards each other. Primarily though, I do think it comes from an inability folks have to decenter men from their lives. To imagine relationships that don’t include them.
Reposted by impastau~
October 18, 2025 at 7:04 PM
Reposted by impastau~
January 20, 2026 at 8:17 AM
Reposted by impastau~
Typical Vaggi XD
January 19, 2026 at 1:02 PM
Typical Vaggi XD
Reposted by impastau~
today’s daily chaggi
January 18, 2026 at 2:23 PM
today’s daily chaggi
Reposted by impastau~
This thing we call a “community” is actually thousands upon thousands of people who have nothing in common except for liking the same shows
If you put too much stock into “the state of the fandom,” you’ll go nuts. There are no rules of conduct, no authorities — it’s inherently a chaotic environment
If you put too much stock into “the state of the fandom,” you’ll go nuts. There are no rules of conduct, no authorities — it’s inherently a chaotic environment
January 18, 2026 at 11:43 PM
This thing we call a “community” is actually thousands upon thousands of people who have nothing in common except for liking the same shows
If you put too much stock into “the state of the fandom,” you’ll go nuts. There are no rules of conduct, no authorities — it’s inherently a chaotic environment
If you put too much stock into “the state of the fandom,” you’ll go nuts. There are no rules of conduct, no authorities — it’s inherently a chaotic environment