You dont need to invoke speech and debate clause for something thats already protected by freedom of speech

Like who

Its Tucker Carlson the fox news host that got fired for being too far out there for even them discussing with Ben Shapiro about how it makes perfect sense half of young men say they prefer socialism given the current economic conditions and how its hard to move forward.

youtube.com/shorts/23WiH...

I get its not the popular position atm but I see it from basically all the big names. AOC polling trump/AOC tickets to see what their deal is, MTG embracing the horseshoe, Bernie with the rogan and fox tryst, now this with Mamdani.

Not really. Pretty sure we're just moving towards populist candidates being forced to recognize they share some voting pools.

Trump doesn't want to fuck over some of his endorsements, Mamdani doesnt want the military in NY any more than they will be anyway.

Because of shit like that though. Trying to sort some things out to reposition probably so I guess with the kirk thing I might be wrong, more about what Ive observed.

Having very little in terms of braincells apparently has some detailed thoughts about the logistics of how we're going to kill all the Mexicans. Didn't have any issue with being confronted with the fact that his plans would involve death. So not a fan of that. Haven't had as many talks recently...

Had some bad effects on my brain at a young age. And like yea I guess if youve never talked to younger right wing people (a lot of them are actually more ambiguously populist but w/e) that'd affect your perception, but I also talked to the dumbest person I know recently, he's like 50 and despite

Unfortunately kirk was actually a pretty charismatic speaker and was involved in the libtard pwnd compilation meme politics that were the only explicitly political thing targeted toward children at the time because libs were being weird about it. Embarrassed to admit I watched a few of those, probs-

Some demographics that have never really felt politics be personal to them.

But yea I definitely detected like an actual difference between the way Charlie's death affected them versus the usual bullshit they pretend to care about. I think the fact that he has a name and a face and a lot of people have watched him since they were kids probably made it feel personal to...

Hmm. Ive definitely detected I think me and you have spoken to different types of conservatives. I dont see them claiming to care about fiscal responsibility or small gov. much unless theyre parroting and dont want to admit an -ism or something. They've been pretty openly fascist recently

Not to criticize but people definitely do still care about Charlie. Flags kept at half mast for way too long, r/conservative has his face for their icon, unsure if the BS going on in schools counts but it does show that people care enough for it to be a way to sneak fascism in front of the kiddies

Elon Musk and Melania are immigrants. I think Fidel Castro had some sus on him I heard.

Its just another manifestation of insincerity culture. Theyre hating the thing because others are and they feel like they should or want to be included, even if the words coming out of their mouth cant match their actions.

Stop making the houses so big then?