Hypoautonomic, BS
banner
hypoautonomic.bsky.social
Hypoautonomic, BS
@hypoautonomic.bsky.social
Looking at misinformation, pseudoscience, and conspiracy theories. He/him.
*desperate cry for media to learn what science denial is*
December 10, 2025 at 4:58 AM
as it so often happens with the trumpy elon sychophantic chuds
December 10, 2025 at 4:14 AM
The other comment covers how idiotic and wrong their conclusions are but this figure further shows they don't know what they are doing. they visually separate bright and less bright cells and then quantify how bright they are. this only proves their eyes work.
December 10, 2025 at 1:09 AM
mr. Oz sir, it says "no diet"
December 8, 2025 at 10:18 PM
he always allies with these types, don't he
December 8, 2025 at 5:13 AM
Back in March 15th, the current NIH director had a Canadian MD on his podcast and said she was the victim of '... legal action that threatens to bankrupt her'.

Guess what actually happened? 🤣
December 8, 2025 at 4:43 AM
Here is the google-translated press release, where it says it's close to the 2007 reference strain. Well, I am sure we will hear more about this soon.

www-mapa-gob-es.translate.goog/es/prensa/ul...
December 6, 2025 at 8:12 PM
The "ministry" in Spain is saying that the swine fever outbreak virus is very similar to a 2007 strain.
December 6, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Theodosius Dobzhansky on lysenkoism
December 5, 2025 at 7:36 AM
Daniel Guérin
1938
December 5, 2025 at 6:50 AM
Quotes for times like these 🧵
December 5, 2025 at 6:46 AM
Daniel seems to know what's in the book, but his word choices across the article give away his position. He describes RFK as warming to "spurned beliefs" like... chemtrails. Chemtrails!
December 5, 2025 at 1:44 AM
This is the moment I realized it. The Real Anthony Fauci is a ludicrous book full of germ theory denial and AIDS denial.

Daniel's paragraph (plus my emotions as I read it):
December 5, 2025 at 1:44 AM
The methods are unchanged from the preprint version and they still haven’t figured out why they couldn’t find a study before 2020 when they searched “AND (Covid)”
December 4, 2025 at 7:18 AM
This is an example of a study they excluded with their curiously bad search method. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9869077/
December 4, 2025 at 2:59 AM
This is like pressing a finger on the scale of their analysis.
December 4, 2025 at 2:59 AM
Not only did they exclude pre-COVID mask studies, they included studies that only contained the word mask, but were not actually about masking.
December 4, 2025 at 2:59 AM
Searching AND COVID effectively means they excluded mask studies before COVID. Their title is already falsified. 🙃
December 4, 2025 at 2:59 AM
But what is immediately apparent from their methods is they actually searched for studies with the words mask/face cover AND COVID...
December 4, 2025 at 2:59 AM
Her and Vinay published a preprint ostensibly on studies "pertaining to masks" in the MMWR
December 4, 2025 at 2:59 AM
truf
December 4, 2025 at 1:52 AM
It might seem like the Nvidia CEO is an expert on AI, but he has a fiduciary responsibility to his company which profits off AI and hype surrounding it. Is he going to call it a stochastic parrot or pretend it 'thinks' 'researches' and 'reflects' ?
December 4, 2025 at 1:41 AM
Jesse has a serious talent for making things convoluted and contradictory
December 4, 2025 at 1:00 AM
Knowing nothing about if the mutations are derived or ancestral, the only date I would have cared about is when they cracked open those samples in the lab for sequencing.
December 4, 2025 at 12:56 AM
I have but one guess
December 3, 2025 at 11:54 PM