The other comment covers how idiotic and wrong their conclusions are but this figure further shows they don't know what they are doing. they visually separate bright and less bright cells and then quantify how bright they are. this only proves their eyes work.
December 10, 2025 at 1:09 AM
The other comment covers how idiotic and wrong their conclusions are but this figure further shows they don't know what they are doing. they visually separate bright and less bright cells and then quantify how bright they are. this only proves their eyes work.
Back in March 15th, the current NIH director had a Canadian MD on his podcast and said she was the victim of '... legal action that threatens to bankrupt her'.
Guess what actually happened? 🤣
December 8, 2025 at 4:43 AM
Back in March 15th, the current NIH director had a Canadian MD on his podcast and said she was the victim of '... legal action that threatens to bankrupt her'.
Daniel seems to know what's in the book, but his word choices across the article give away his position. He describes RFK as warming to "spurned beliefs" like... chemtrails. Chemtrails!
December 5, 2025 at 1:44 AM
Daniel seems to know what's in the book, but his word choices across the article give away his position. He describes RFK as warming to "spurned beliefs" like... chemtrails. Chemtrails!
The methods are unchanged from the preprint version and they still haven’t figured out why they couldn’t find a study before 2020 when they searched “AND (Covid)”
December 4, 2025 at 7:18 AM
The methods are unchanged from the preprint version and they still haven’t figured out why they couldn’t find a study before 2020 when they searched “AND (Covid)”
It might seem like the Nvidia CEO is an expert on AI, but he has a fiduciary responsibility to his company which profits off AI and hype surrounding it. Is he going to call it a stochastic parrot or pretend it 'thinks' 'researches' and 'reflects' ?
December 4, 2025 at 1:41 AM
It might seem like the Nvidia CEO is an expert on AI, but he has a fiduciary responsibility to his company which profits off AI and hype surrounding it. Is he going to call it a stochastic parrot or pretend it 'thinks' 'researches' and 'reflects' ?
Knowing nothing about if the mutations are derived or ancestral, the only date I would have cared about is when they cracked open those samples in the lab for sequencing.
December 4, 2025 at 12:56 AM
Knowing nothing about if the mutations are derived or ancestral, the only date I would have cared about is when they cracked open those samples in the lab for sequencing.