Did you know seth green is in their nazi cult?

Green had been developing an animated TV show titled White Horse Tavern, with the BAYC ape (named Fred Simian) as the main character

📕 Pocket Book Drops (Discordian)
- Confirmed via Reddit PDF and screenshots
- Description: Mass-dissemination of Principia Discordia with symbolic graffiti
- Evidence Tier: `T1`
- Implication: *Coordinated memetic graffiti campaign with plausible deniability built-in*

😬 Smileface with Broken Teeth
- Appears in:
- NFT-style artwork
- Poster campaigns
- Possibly book drop materials
- Correlation: Subject dental trauma
- Evidence Tier: ~`T2`~ → `T1` ✅ (Verified symbolic drop)

The same #cult that started an harassment campaign telling others to spread lies about me in books and scatter them in cities:

raindrop.io/HyperSane/di...

discordianism is BAYC
Who's been documented as creating other ops.
Compare to trailer they drove to my house, pinned comment.

pretty weird a comic publisher would repeat 4chan memetics, an harassment campaign.

Which was created by republicans.

If you look in the bottom-right they admit it's a republican op.

www.hypersane.org/Public/The+B...

The "nobody op"

raindrop.io/HyperSane/4c...

Now darkhorse are #BAYC ? , elite nazi cult.

They are directly repeating their meme.

Repeating a 4chan cult meme, so much for equality

youtube.com/live/-yUp0qH...

The Boulder = imposed, external suffering (illness, barriers, gaslighting)
The Gods = the able-bodied majority / institutional power / default ontology
The Hill = false meritocracy / normative expectation of functioning
The Judgment = moralized failure, not actual failure

So the #ethical options are:

Reduce greater harms elsewhere (diet, consumption, industry), or

Punish marginalized users for a system they didn’t create

Choosing option 2 is not #environmentalism.
It’s scapegoating.

If AI is inevitable, offset is the ethical move

Here’s the fork they can’t escape:

AI is not leaving

Disabled people are already using it to survive, communicate, and advocate

This was true long before generative AI existed

So the contradiction is stark:

Opposing AI on climate grounds while supporting animal agriculture
is opposing a marginal contributor while defending a dominant one.

That is not climate ethics.
That is selective outrage.

If the claim is:

“AI is unethical because of climate impact”

Then consistency demands proportional response.

Facts that matter:

Animal agriculture has been a leading driver of climate destruction for decades

It massively outweighs AI in land use, emissions, water use, deforestation

That’s not justice.
That’s privilege mistaking itself for principle.

If your ethics only work when everyone starts from the same baseline, they are not ethics — they’re abstraction.

People who say:

“No one should use #AI, ever”

are implicitly saying:

“Those who already struggle should struggle more — for the sake of my moral comfort.”

No allowance for advocacy when barriers already exist

That is not neutral.
That is discriminatory by design.

Disability justice is not about equal rules — it’s about equitable outcomes.
Any ethic that refuses accommodation is anti‑disability, regardless of intent.