Here Hear
@herehear.bsky.social
Did Davey criticise the BBC for its proven widespread bias at the 2014 Scottish independence referendum?
Not a chance, all the Brit Nat parties lapped it up when the bias aligned with their own.
Treacherous clown
Not a chance, all the Brit Nat parties lapped it up when the bias aligned with their own.
Treacherous clown
November 10, 2025 at 4:32 PM
Did Davey criticise the BBC for its proven widespread bias at the 2014 Scottish independence referendum?
Not a chance, all the Brit Nat parties lapped it up when the bias aligned with their own.
Treacherous clown
Not a chance, all the Brit Nat parties lapped it up when the bias aligned with their own.
Treacherous clown
The Brits were happy with BBC bias, as long as it was their bias.
When the Beeb’s bias doesn’t align with theirs, the hand ringing kicks in.
When the Beeb’s bias doesn’t align with theirs, the hand ringing kicks in.
November 10, 2025 at 7:27 AM
The Brits were happy with BBC bias, as long as it was their bias.
When the Beeb’s bias doesn’t align with theirs, the hand ringing kicks in.
When the Beeb’s bias doesn’t align with theirs, the hand ringing kicks in.
Not one British nationalist politician raised their hand to say the BBC was scandalously bias at the 2014 Scottish independence referendum.
The British establishment including the BBC came together to overcome the threat.
The British establishment including the BBC came together to overcome the threat.
November 10, 2025 at 7:09 AM
Not one British nationalist politician raised their hand to say the BBC was scandalously bias at the 2014 Scottish independence referendum.
The British establishment including the BBC came together to overcome the threat.
The British establishment including the BBC came together to overcome the threat.
Pro-independence voters will see this as yet another power grab and who could argue.
November 9, 2025 at 11:10 PM
Pro-independence voters will see this as yet another power grab and who could argue.
Routes (2) between England and Scotland are already electrified.
This edict from the Westminster Transport Secretary will trample all over the Scottish Government and Transport Scotland’s transport policy and their legal obligations on decarbonisation.
This is turbo charging a reversal of devolution
This edict from the Westminster Transport Secretary will trample all over the Scottish Government and Transport Scotland’s transport policy and their legal obligations on decarbonisation.
This is turbo charging a reversal of devolution
November 9, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Routes (2) between England and Scotland are already electrified.
This edict from the Westminster Transport Secretary will trample all over the Scottish Government and Transport Scotland’s transport policy and their legal obligations on decarbonisation.
This is turbo charging a reversal of devolution
This edict from the Westminster Transport Secretary will trample all over the Scottish Government and Transport Scotland’s transport policy and their legal obligations on decarbonisation.
This is turbo charging a reversal of devolution
There was complete acceptance and agreement from all UK nationalist parties when the BBC was vociferously pro union at the Scottish independence referendum.
The BBC sold their soul, so there’s precious little sympathy here for the organisation or any London based party bleating at its plight now.
The BBC sold their soul, so there’s precious little sympathy here for the organisation or any London based party bleating at its plight now.
November 9, 2025 at 8:30 PM
There was complete acceptance and agreement from all UK nationalist parties when the BBC was vociferously pro union at the Scottish independence referendum.
The BBC sold their soul, so there’s precious little sympathy here for the organisation or any London based party bleating at its plight now.
The BBC sold their soul, so there’s precious little sympathy here for the organisation or any London based party bleating at its plight now.
Network Rail run the track in UK.
GBR will run Network Rail.
Westminster will run GBR.
If Scotland and Wales want to expand or complete electrification they need Westminster to pay for it (not an English subsidy, using Scottish & Welsh taxpayers money they rake in).
Will English MP’s vote for that?
GBR will run Network Rail.
Westminster will run GBR.
If Scotland and Wales want to expand or complete electrification they need Westminster to pay for it (not an English subsidy, using Scottish & Welsh taxpayers money they rake in).
Will English MP’s vote for that?
November 9, 2025 at 8:23 PM
Network Rail run the track in UK.
GBR will run Network Rail.
Westminster will run GBR.
If Scotland and Wales want to expand or complete electrification they need Westminster to pay for it (not an English subsidy, using Scottish & Welsh taxpayers money they rake in).
Will English MP’s vote for that?
GBR will run Network Rail.
Westminster will run GBR.
If Scotland and Wales want to expand or complete electrification they need Westminster to pay for it (not an English subsidy, using Scottish & Welsh taxpayers money they rake in).
Will English MP’s vote for that?
Correct me if I’m mistaken, but NR fund electrification in Scotland/Wales.
NR is run by Westminster.
If Westminster says no more electrification, where does that leave Scotland/Wales?
NR is run by Westminster.
If Westminster says no more electrification, where does that leave Scotland/Wales?
November 9, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Correct me if I’m mistaken, but NR fund electrification in Scotland/Wales.
NR is run by Westminster.
If Westminster says no more electrification, where does that leave Scotland/Wales?
NR is run by Westminster.
If Westminster says no more electrification, where does that leave Scotland/Wales?
Network Rail run the track in UK.
GBR will run Network Rail.
Westminster will run GBR.
If Scotland and Wales want to expand or complete electrification they need Westminster to pay for it (not an English subsidy, using Scottish & Welsh taxpayers money they rake in).
Will English MP’s vote for that?
GBR will run Network Rail.
Westminster will run GBR.
If Scotland and Wales want to expand or complete electrification they need Westminster to pay for it (not an English subsidy, using Scottish & Welsh taxpayers money they rake in).
Will English MP’s vote for that?
November 9, 2025 at 8:13 PM
Network Rail run the track in UK.
GBR will run Network Rail.
Westminster will run GBR.
If Scotland and Wales want to expand or complete electrification they need Westminster to pay for it (not an English subsidy, using Scottish & Welsh taxpayers money they rake in).
Will English MP’s vote for that?
GBR will run Network Rail.
Westminster will run GBR.
If Scotland and Wales want to expand or complete electrification they need Westminster to pay for it (not an English subsidy, using Scottish & Welsh taxpayers money they rake in).
Will English MP’s vote for that?
Sanctimonious push from the party of illegal wars, responsible for multiple dead UK soldiers, millions of dead Iraqi’s and 25 years of destabilising the Middle East.
Labour, the party of war criminals.
Labour, the party of war criminals.
November 5, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Sanctimonious push from the party of illegal wars, responsible for multiple dead UK soldiers, millions of dead Iraqi’s and 25 years of destabilising the Middle East.
Labour, the party of war criminals.
Labour, the party of war criminals.
I oppose nuclear weapons.
I’m waiting on the chap at the door Mr 5% Scottish ya wrong’n.
I’m waiting on the chap at the door Mr 5% Scottish ya wrong’n.
November 5, 2025 at 8:59 PM
I oppose nuclear weapons.
I’m waiting on the chap at the door Mr 5% Scottish ya wrong’n.
I’m waiting on the chap at the door Mr 5% Scottish ya wrong’n.
The Labour Party in particular should hang their collective heads in shame for burning the only imperfect attempt at challenging 100 years of sectarian bile without offering any alternative.
I wouldn’t expect anything else from the Tories.
Scotland and Scottish football are poorer for this betrayal.
I wouldn’t expect anything else from the Tories.
Scotland and Scottish football are poorer for this betrayal.
November 5, 2025 at 7:38 PM
The Labour Party in particular should hang their collective heads in shame for burning the only imperfect attempt at challenging 100 years of sectarian bile without offering any alternative.
I wouldn’t expect anything else from the Tories.
Scotland and Scottish football are poorer for this betrayal.
I wouldn’t expect anything else from the Tories.
Scotland and Scottish football are poorer for this betrayal.
The duopoly has been self defeating on the European stage.
When gate receipts were shared and central funds distributed more evenly Scottish clubs were winning European trophies.
Hogging the cash and weakening the opposition has diminished the ugly sisters.
When gate receipts were shared and central funds distributed more evenly Scottish clubs were winning European trophies.
Hogging the cash and weakening the opposition has diminished the ugly sisters.
November 5, 2025 at 7:33 PM
The duopoly has been self defeating on the European stage.
When gate receipts were shared and central funds distributed more evenly Scottish clubs were winning European trophies.
Hogging the cash and weakening the opposition has diminished the ugly sisters.
When gate receipts were shared and central funds distributed more evenly Scottish clubs were winning European trophies.
Hogging the cash and weakening the opposition has diminished the ugly sisters.
I agree that the Offensive Behaviour at Football Act was a poor bit of legislation, but it’s criminal that our lawmakers couldn’t come together to improve it, rather than playing part politics and ripping it down.
Let’s face it, nothing was done about rabid secularism before this act or after it.
Let’s face it, nothing was done about rabid secularism before this act or after it.
November 5, 2025 at 7:24 PM
I agree that the Offensive Behaviour at Football Act was a poor bit of legislation, but it’s criminal that our lawmakers couldn’t come together to improve it, rather than playing part politics and ripping it down.
Let’s face it, nothing was done about rabid secularism before this act or after it.
Let’s face it, nothing was done about rabid secularism before this act or after it.
You pay handsomely for your energy, but Westminster rakes in the taxes from Scotland’s energy bounty.
When we slip the tethers Westminster misses out on all that loot and it goes straight to Edinburgh.
The British nationalists like to say Scotland’s too wee and poor to be independent, crazy fools.
When we slip the tethers Westminster misses out on all that loot and it goes straight to Edinburgh.
The British nationalists like to say Scotland’s too wee and poor to be independent, crazy fools.
November 5, 2025 at 6:58 PM
You pay handsomely for your energy, but Westminster rakes in the taxes from Scotland’s energy bounty.
When we slip the tethers Westminster misses out on all that loot and it goes straight to Edinburgh.
The British nationalists like to say Scotland’s too wee and poor to be independent, crazy fools.
When we slip the tethers Westminster misses out on all that loot and it goes straight to Edinburgh.
The British nationalists like to say Scotland’s too wee and poor to be independent, crazy fools.
Except in Scotland.
Sleight of hand from Labour.
Sleight of hand from Labour.
November 5, 2025 at 11:05 AM
Except in Scotland.
Sleight of hand from Labour.
Sleight of hand from Labour.
What will they do when Scotland slips the tethers and they’ve no free access to our oil, gas and green electricity?
November 5, 2025 at 9:27 AM
What will they do when Scotland slips the tethers and they’ve no free access to our oil, gas and green electricity?
Your reasoning against an elected head of state being susceptible to populists causing untold damage, falls apart when you also say the heredity head of state is subservient to the government who might well be populist!
We might as well have someone we can replace a preset intervals.
We might as well have someone we can replace a preset intervals.
October 27, 2025 at 6:43 PM
Your reasoning against an elected head of state being susceptible to populists causing untold damage, falls apart when you also say the heredity head of state is subservient to the government who might well be populist!
We might as well have someone we can replace a preset intervals.
We might as well have someone we can replace a preset intervals.
Subservient to the government of the day?
So if we get a fascistic government next we’ll have a goose stepping king.
So if we get a fascistic government next we’ll have a goose stepping king.
October 27, 2025 at 6:40 PM
Subservient to the government of the day?
So if we get a fascistic government next we’ll have a goose stepping king.
So if we get a fascistic government next we’ll have a goose stepping king.
The monarchy is weak in the UK?
MP’s can’t mention the royal family in the chamber
How would we get rid of a deviant king or queen?
Monarchs can also manipulate the system and cause untold damage and it’s unclear how we’d get rid of them.
If a future monarch was a deviant could/would you block them?
MP’s can’t mention the royal family in the chamber
How would we get rid of a deviant king or queen?
Monarchs can also manipulate the system and cause untold damage and it’s unclear how we’d get rid of them.
If a future monarch was a deviant could/would you block them?
October 27, 2025 at 6:15 PM
The monarchy is weak in the UK?
MP’s can’t mention the royal family in the chamber
How would we get rid of a deviant king or queen?
Monarchs can also manipulate the system and cause untold damage and it’s unclear how we’d get rid of them.
If a future monarch was a deviant could/would you block them?
MP’s can’t mention the royal family in the chamber
How would we get rid of a deviant king or queen?
Monarchs can also manipulate the system and cause untold damage and it’s unclear how we’d get rid of them.
If a future monarch was a deviant could/would you block them?
However, isn’t this one of the strongest arguments against a hereditary monarchy?
What if Charles Windsor was the “wrong ‘un” how would we deal with that?
The head of state should be chosen by the nation and be answerable for their behaviour.
What if Charles Windsor was the “wrong ‘un” how would we deal with that?
The head of state should be chosen by the nation and be answerable for their behaviour.
October 27, 2025 at 5:43 PM
However, isn’t this one of the strongest arguments against a hereditary monarchy?
What if Charles Windsor was the “wrong ‘un” how would we deal with that?
The head of state should be chosen by the nation and be answerable for their behaviour.
What if Charles Windsor was the “wrong ‘un” how would we deal with that?
The head of state should be chosen by the nation and be answerable for their behaviour.
The Windsor’s aren’t the first family to have a “wrong ‘un” in their family.
Every “wrong ‘un” has a family that are mortified by their deviant pursuits.
So, a certain amount of understanding to the Windsor’s.
Every “wrong ‘un” has a family that are mortified by their deviant pursuits.
So, a certain amount of understanding to the Windsor’s.
October 27, 2025 at 5:43 PM
The Windsor’s aren’t the first family to have a “wrong ‘un” in their family.
Every “wrong ‘un” has a family that are mortified by their deviant pursuits.
So, a certain amount of understanding to the Windsor’s.
Every “wrong ‘un” has a family that are mortified by their deviant pursuits.
So, a certain amount of understanding to the Windsor’s.
Your team’s shite and their fans are entitled.
The world will still be turning tomorrow.
The world will still be turning tomorrow.
October 26, 2025 at 1:23 PM
Your team’s shite and their fans are entitled.
The world will still be turning tomorrow.
The world will still be turning tomorrow.
You spelled jailed wrong.
October 21, 2025 at 8:14 PM
You spelled jailed wrong.
It’s either Ange or Steve Clarke.
Get a tenner in each.
Get a tenner in each.
October 19, 2025 at 9:37 PM
It’s either Ange or Steve Clarke.
Get a tenner in each.
Get a tenner in each.