Da gibt es einige: Pfannkuchen, Spritzkuchen, Churros, Quarkbällchen, Windbeutel, uvm.

Da brauch ich nicht Großmuttern fragen, das habe ich schon selbst ausprobiert:

Hohe Gefäße sind für soetwas häufig unpraktisch.
In größerem Maßstab sieht das Backgefäß übrigens so aus:
Auch längst kein Topf

Bildquelle: youtu.be/GqHMll81Kks?...

Wer Pfannkuchen im Topf frittiert kocht Nudeln auch auf dem Grill.

Das sind 7 Pfannkuchen, denn man backt sie in der Pfanne.

No, the proposal is standardisation to the medium gauge in use in Europe, as that's the by far most used gauge.
It's still expensive to keep a wider gauge than most trains use.

So you waste the entire capacity of the larger gauge.
That's hugely expensive to do so.

fiber-optic cables are the three things which move almost the entire GDP around. Small increases in their costs result in massive increases in GDP.

Dual gauge trains are inefficient and expensive on the wider gauge, though, as train gauges don't only standardise the distance between those two iron bars, but also platform positions and tunnel sizes.

Nobody said that a uniform railway standard was available for free, but railways, ships and

Which isn't all too big in comparison to all the "Cost. Cost. And more cost." of having different railway standards and therefore huge hurdles to trade within something that behaves as one country.

Why would it be a bad idea? Different railway standards in every EU country are a real burden to the EU.

Isn't there already an initiative in construction to get every EU-country on normal gauge?