Great to hear that your first worry is a burning planet. Which is coincidentally a contributor to number 3.

I presume you were at www.nebriefing.org

Could you please get your boss to make that his number 1 priority? The UK being uninhabitable in the future should scare his socks off.

Here's an archaeological investigation of their abused bodies, in just one graveyard:

the-past.com/feature/tire...

The physics is simple.

Every bit of fossil fuels that we will burn pages us into a further changed climate, and increases the chances of pushing earth’s climate over OneI’ve the many tipping points.

Physics does not do pragmatism, and hence we cannot be pragmatic with climate change

Companies with that name seem to be going bust all the time. They should try a different name

That won’t help. Everybody needs a DNA test.

Maybe Palantir can help out?

Genius!

My beef is to invest 17 billion that we pay for into outdated fossil fuel technology.

We should be slowly deprecating most of the natural gas grid. Keeping a few bits for heavy industry, getting rid of all residential connections

And here we are: the UK government will invest almost twice as much money in the gas grid than in the electric grid.

Any idea as to why OFGEM thinks it’s a good idea to upgrade the gas network to the tune of 17 billion? Shouldn’t we spend more on electrification?

The government’s response is to spend 10 billion on upgrading the electric grid and 17 billion (!) on updating the gas grid.

Let’s sink more money and resources in fossil fuel.

Is was maddening to think that people want to use hydrogen for heating buildings; at least 6x less efficient than heatpumps.

Even more maddening given that green hydrogen is going to use our scarce water supply, and we should reserve it for those bits of industry that will rely on it

Never forget who the the Rothermeres chooses to side with.

Fixed it for you

Well played sir!

It’s lovely.

What comes close is a quote about the Judean People Front

Like with Truss the bond markets may dislike you.

Unlike with Truss this is for a good cause.

Hah! Good find!

Even if it freezes over, there’s still water flowing underneath the ice which one can cool down by 1C. The for must be the same, unless there’s a big lake forming somewhere.

Winter flow will be lower than spring flow but still vast

A mistake that has no practical difference

Check my maths, but water holds 4 J per gram per degree C; flow rate is between 500 and 2000 cubic metres pets second; that is between 2 and 8 GWatt per degree input. At 4x that is 8-32 GWatt output for 1 degree of cooling?