Harm Schepel
banner
harmschepel.bsky.social
Harm Schepel
@harmschepel.bsky.social
Professor of Economic Law, University of Torino. Managing editor, European Law Open.
Reposted by Harm Schepel
Reposted by Harm Schepel
Political authority and direct rule in the activist EU: Floris de Witte on First View.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Rule in the New European Union | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
Rule in the New European Union
www.cambridge.org
December 30, 2025 at 7:16 AM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
We're trying very hard not to make a joke about Christmas King Carol. On First View, Cosmin Cercel on the construction of authoritarian rule in interwar Romania.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
The threshold of emergency: sovereign power, constitutional change and the spectre of Civil War in 1938 Romania | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
The threshold of emergency: sovereign power, constitutional change and the spectre of Civil War in 1938 Romania
www.cambridge.org
December 23, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
L'ora del potere esecutivo: Orlando Scarcello on the legal thought of Constantino Mortati in fascist Italy.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Italy’s authoritarian turn as executive dominance: Costantino Mortati’s early writings (1931–1944) | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
Italy’s authoritarian turn as executive dominance: Costantino Mortati’s early writings (1931–1944)
www.cambridge.org
December 19, 2025 at 8:35 AM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
This is how it is done: posit a problem, sketch out a theoretical framework, apply said framework to the analysis of the material. Excellent work by Tom Bouwman on First View.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Not all consumers are the same: how is the differentiation between consumers operationalised in EU consumer law? | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
Not all consumers are the same: how is the differentiation between consumers operationalised in EU consumer law?
www.cambridge.org
December 18, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
The revolution will not be televised. But it is available on FirstView: @martijnhesselink.bsky.social proposes to occupy the European Commission’s recent plans for a 28th legal regime.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Prefigurative EU law | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
Prefigurative EU law
www.cambridge.org
December 15, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
How European society produces 'a core where EU values are fully guaranteed, and a periphery where they disappear.' Toni Marzal has important things to say.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
EU values and the place of European society: an external-focused account | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
EU values and the place of European society: an external-focused account
www.cambridge.org
December 10, 2025 at 3:07 PM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
On First View, Loïc Azoulai on the naissances latentes of European society and its law.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
European society and its law: EU law in light of social theory | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
European society and its law: EU law in light of social theory
www.cambridge.org
December 9, 2025 at 4:48 PM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
On First View: @zacharymazur.bsky.social unravels a complicated story of interwar authoritarianism in Poland.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Who’s the sovereign? Legitimating constitutional authoritarianism in interwar Poland | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
Who’s the sovereign? Legitimating constitutional authoritarianism in interwar Poland
www.cambridge.org
December 5, 2025 at 9:54 AM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
Strengthening national military–industrial complexes rather than building a coordinated European defence framework? Marco Dani and Agustín Menéndez on keeping freedom free in the EU.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
The EU’s (not so) cheap talk on defence | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
The EU’s (not so) cheap talk on defence - Volume 4 Issue 3
www.cambridge.org
December 3, 2025 at 7:42 AM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
On FirstView- Mala Loth on the unlikeliest of legal entrepeneurs to write the history of European legal integration. Fascinating stuff.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Rethinking the Marshall-Cases ‘from below’: Helen Marshall as a legal entrepreneur in Southern England and Luxembourg, 1978–1993 | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
Rethinking the Marshall-Cases ‘from below’: Helen Marshall as a legal entrepreneur in Southern England and Luxembourg, 1978–1993
www.cambridge.org
November 19, 2025 at 8:09 AM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
The symposium is coming together nicely: Brigitte Leucht, Magnus Esmark and Mala Loth write the introduction cum manifest on bottom-up legal history. @koenvanzon.bsky.social @historikarin.bsky.social @whommes.bsky.social @lolaavril.bsky.social

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Rethinking European legal integration: legal text from a bottom-up perspective and the functioning of European law, 1957–2000 | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
Rethinking European legal integration: legal text from a bottom-up perspective and the functioning of European law, 1957–2000
www.cambridge.org
November 12, 2025 at 8:35 AM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
On FirstView: Chris Thornhill on violence as the not-so mystical foundation of constitutionalism.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Constitutional subjects: the formation and fracture of constitutional legitimacy. Towards a phenomenology of law and violence | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
Constitutional subjects: the formation and fracture of constitutional legitimacy. Towards a phenomenology of law and violence
www.cambridge.org
November 10, 2025 at 11:45 AM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
On FirstView: our own @lolaavril.bsky.social writes a history of the European legal profession. It started out so well: ‘the common market has nothing to do with lawyers’

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
‘A Community Frame to Habits and Traditions?’ – A socio-historical account of the attempt to build a European Legal Profession (1957–1977) | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
‘A Community Frame to Habits and Traditions?’ – A socio-historical account of the attempt to build a European Legal Profession (1957–1977)
www.cambridge.org
November 6, 2025 at 8:50 AM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
Another contribution on FirstView to our symposium on constitutional identity: Laurianne Allezard on concepts of identity.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Beyond constitutional identity: Thinking identity in constitutional law | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
Beyond constitutional identity: Thinking identity in constitutional law
www.cambridge.org
October 28, 2025 at 2:58 PM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
Down to be wrong. On FirstView, Magnus Esmark goes on a Bourdieusian walk through the Buy Danish saga

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
The 1989 buy-Danish clause: making sense of legal error through allodoxia | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
The 1989 buy-Danish clause: making sense of legal error through allodoxia
www.cambridge.org
October 23, 2025 at 9:09 AM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
How the ECtHR came to life through pressure groups and entrepeneurial academics. Wild stories beautifully told by Wiebe Hommes on FirstView.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
In search of an independent tribunal: activating the European Court of Human Rights, 1969–1974 | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
In search of an independent tribunal: activating the European Court of Human Rights, 1969–1974
www.cambridge.org
October 22, 2025 at 10:53 AM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
On First View: Ophelia Bentley and Kathleen McNamara on the turn in competition policy towards securitization. Hugely important stuff.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
The securitization of competition in the European Union | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
The securitization of competition in the European Union
www.cambridge.org
October 5, 2025 at 9:14 AM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
On First View: Pablo Ibáñez Colomo on the increasing deference the CJEU shows the Commission on legal issues in merger control.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Judicial review in EU merger control: towards deference on issues of law? | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
Judicial review in EU merger control: towards deference on issues of law?
www.cambridge.org
September 23, 2025 at 10:44 AM
Reposted by Harm Schepel
Reposted by Harm Schepel
Reposted by Harm Schepel
It's not just that Integration-Through-Law no longer holds: it never did. Robert Schütze goes to town.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
‘Integration-through-Law’: grand theory, revisionist history | European Law Open | Cambridge Core
‘Integration-through-Law’: grand theory, revisionist history - Volume 4 Issue 2
www.cambridge.org
August 27, 2025 at 8:30 AM